[Webhob] task types and outcomes

Dragomir, CalinX L calinx.l.dragomir at intel.com
Fri May 31 07:04:32 PDT 2013


What about "Checked" ?

Thanks,
Calin

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Eggleton [mailto:paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com] 
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 5:03 PM
To: webhob at yoctoproject.org
Cc: Otavio Salvador; Barros Pena, Belen; Dragomir, CalinX L; Zhang, Jessica
Subject: Re: [Webhob] task types and outcomes

On Friday 31 May 2013 10:53:43 Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Barros Pena, Belen <
> 
> belen.barros.pena at intel.com> wrote:
> > On 30/05/2013 15:21, "Richard Purdie" 
> > <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org>
> > 
> > wrote:
> > >> So for the 'all tasks' table, we could have a 'task type' column 
> > >> classifying tasks as 'executed' and 'not executed'.
> > >
> > >I'd prefer "Prebuilt" than "not executed" but yes.
> > 
> > Prebuilt sounds good to me, but it causes a bit of a naming issue. 
> > We have identified 3 possible 'Outcomes' for prebuilt tasks: sstate, 
> > skipped and previously built (tasks for which an stamp file exists). 
> > 'Prebuilt' and 'Previously built' are too similar, which is bound to cause confusion.
> > 
> > Does any of you have any ideas for a better name for the 'Previously 
> > built' outcome?
> 
> What about 'Cached'?

That clashes with the sstate "cache". Not that I have any better suggestion...

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre



More information about the toaster mailing list