[meta-xilinx] SPI problem
star at gmx.li
Thu May 11 05:31:25 PDT 2017
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Mai 2017 um 07:24 Uhr
> Von: "Mike Looijmans" <mike.looijmans at topic.nl>
> An: "Nathan Rossi" <nathan at nathanrossi.com>, "Arno Steffens" <star at gmx.li>
> Cc: meta-xilinx at yoctoproject.org
> Betreff: Re: [meta-xilinx] SPI problem
> On 10-05-17 15:23, Nathan Rossi wrote:
> > On 10 May 2017 at 17:18, Arno Steffens <star at gmx.li> wrote:
> >> Thanks Mike for the feedback.
> >> It is an OnSemi Phyton camera chip.
> >> Unfortunately FPGA is not suitable solution for me. The layout is already fixed and I am not an FPGA expert.
> >> Checking the SPI registers in Technical Manual: it seems that there is no separate setting for CPOL/CPH for MOSI and MISO.
> >> The only way I see is to send address, keep CS low, change SPI mode, read.
> >> But there is another limitation. In struct spi_ioc_transfer there is a setting: bits_per_word. I need 10 for doing that
> >> as described for the first part (9 bit adress + 1 r/w bit). This returns an error "could not transmit data". Any value expect 8 is returning an error.
> >> Is this a limitation by hardware or an issue in driver, which can be fixed?
> > For the Zynq PS SPI controllers there is a hard limit to 8-bit words
> > (kernel driver advertises this here:
> > http://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/spi/spi-cadence.c#L565).
> > If you need 10b words and you do not want to do it with an FPGA
> > device, you can always use the kernels spi-bitbang module. But this is
> > likely only good for low bandwidth control SPI, so if you are using
> > SPI to pull image data from the camera this is probably not what you
> > want. Also you could easily modify the spi-bitbang module to handle
> > this CPOL inversion, such that it always samples MISO on the falling
> > edge.
> Camera chips usually only use the SPI interface for configuration, so I'd go
> with Nathan's suggestion and use Linux' bit-bang SPI controller for setting
> camera parameters and such. Let the kernel pinmix the pins as GPIO and assign
> them via devicetree to the bitbang controller.
> Kind regards,
> Mike Looijmans
> System Expert
In fact it is just for configuration.
Thanks, so it is clear that I can't hope to solve it without changing the bitstream (although remapping is not a big deal). Do you have an idea what frequency can be achieved by this driver?
And I am a bit afraid of negative side-effect to more "realtime" related stuff on ARM.
More information about the meta-xilinx