[meta-ti] [yocto] build failure with xf86-video-omap
denys at ti.com
Wed Nov 21 15:39:54 PST 2012
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:26:12AM +0100, Nicolas Dechesne wrote:
> looping rob clark (upstream author)
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton at intel.com>wrote:
> > On 21 November 2012 22:52, Nicolas Dechesne <ndec13 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > since xf86-video-omap was recently merged in oe-core and poky, i am
> > trying
> > > to remove the recipes we had staged in meta-ti trees for some weeks
> > > (
> > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-ti/commit/?id=410dc026f2ee24a2346e7563a83f0181c79809cf
> > ).
> > > so i was trying to build poky/master with meta-ti/master, for
> > pandaboard,
> > > and I get build failures in xf86-video-omap  and .
> > >
> > > so  is actually trivial, as we are missing a DEPENDS in the recipe, i
> > can
> > > send a patch in oe-core for that.
> > Please do.
> sure, will do.
> > >  is a bit more cryptic to me.. so I quickly tried to build with danny
> > ( i
> > > just cherry picked the commit that introduced xf86-video-omap from
> > master)
> > > and this time it built fine.
> > >
> > > has anyone actually tested this recipe? if so I must be doing something
> > > wrong, any hint would be helpful.
> > This was discussed a few hours ago. It's caused by a) the
> > configure.ac being broken and b) the workaround for this being removed
> > by me in e828faf027540bc5def8b7371a959884caad9557 (which is in master
> > only). Presumably this code was test built before that patch landed.
> > As this is a genuine upstream bug (ARM-specific driver that doesn't
> > cross-compile?!) I've just filed fdo #57386.
> i suspect you opened a OE bug, since I can't find it in yocto BZ, however
> bugs.openembedded.org doesn't seem to answer at the moment..
AFAIK, OE bugzilla was deprecated some time ago. We were considering taking it
down, as a matter of fact. OE-Core issues are logged into Yocto bugzilla. Not
sure where Ross filed this one though.
> so, I checked our configure.ac , and clearly, that needs some love...
> Rob: any chance you can look into that? it's the xf86-video-omap
> configure.ac file that's wrong, we should mimic what's in the
> xf-video-intel one i guess.. otherwise i can try later this week.
More information about the meta-ti