[meta-ti] xf86-video-omap and libdrm for OMAP

Nicolas Dechesne ndec13 at gmail.com
Tue Nov 20 09:10:17 PST 2012

well.. obviously, with the libdrm update, and our .bbappend in meta-ti
things are even worse than I had thought... and the tree doesn't even build
anymore, at least for panda, as we have:

COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "omap4|omap5"

in the .bbappend

so now that brings another question... should we start a 'danny' branch on
meta-ti? if we remove the libdrm and xf86-video-omap recipes from
meta-ti/master, then we break meta-ti/master with poky/danny...

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Nicolas Dechesne <ndec13 at gmail.com> wrote:

> hi
> i just noticed that the recipe for xf86-video-omap was just merged into
> poky/master, and that libdrm was updated as well (and OMAP experimental
> support was enabled too):
> 0ed7c53 xf86-video-omap: add new recipe to follow the maintained repo
> cb758f9 libdrm: upgrade to 2.4.40
> from a quick review, i believe this should supersede the recipes from
> meta-ti that got merged recently:
> 410dc02 xf86-video-omap: add new recipe for OMAP4/5 X11 video driver
> cce5a7a libdrm: enable omap experimental api support
> i won't be able to get that tested in the next couple of days, very
> likely, so i wanted to know:
> - if anyone tested poky/master (or oe-core as this came from oe-core) on
> panda and/or beagle?
> - what is the policy in this situation? should we simply remove our
> recipes from meta-ti?
> cheers
> nicolas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-ti/attachments/20121120/f465ec0d/attachment.html>

More information about the meta-ti mailing list