[meta-freescale] is meta-fsl-ppc layer even used anymore?
otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br
Mon Jul 10 11:24:31 PDT 2017
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday at crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday at crashcourse.ca> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday at crashcourse.ca> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > i was having trouble building for t1042d4rdb with the
>> >> > meta-fsl-ppc layer until i noticed that the meta-freescale layer
>> >> > had a machine definition for the same target. does the
>> >> > meta-freescale layer obsolete meta-fsl-ppc?
>> >> Yes. meta-freescale provides it all.
>> > then it might be useful to remove links to superseded meta-fsl-*
>> > layers from
>> > https://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layers/
>> For meta-fsl-arm I added, long time ago, a note:
>> For morty and newer releases, use the meta-freescale layer instead.
>> Now to be even more clear, I setted it to inactive.
>> The meta-fsl-ppc, I don't have control on the metadata to update it.
>> I am adding Luo to look at it.
> so does that mean meta-fsl-ppc has also been folded into
> meta-freescale? or is it still meant to be used independently?
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
More information about the meta-freescale