[meta-freescale] [PATCH 08/24] linux-qoriq: unify recipe for QorIQ ARM and QorIQ PPC

Otavio Salvador otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br
Tue Sep 15 16:12:43 PDT 2015

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 7:56 PM, Bob Cochran <yocto at mindchasers.com> wrote:
> Thanks for all the info Otavio.  I'm assuming your attention to meta-fsl-arm
> is primarily for i.MX. Please let me know if you are also testing LS1 (e.g.,
> ls1021a-twr) now using meta-fsl-arm.

We have it building in our autobuilder but it is also failing.

> And I still need to figure out which repo(s) I should use to most
> effectively develop & test with the changes coming for Yocto 1.9.  I think I
> want to work with the github meta-freescale repo, especially since I need to
> build images for both ARM and Power.  Please let me know if you disagree and
> think I'm just asking for headaches due to a lack of stability.
> Asking another way, are people testing against the github meta-freescale
> repo / layer?

meta-freescale is the future, it seems. How far is it, this is the question.

Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750

More information about the meta-freescale mailing list