[meta-freescale] [PATCH 08/24] linux-qoriq: unify recipe for QorIQ ARM and QorIQ PPC
otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br
Tue Sep 15 16:12:43 PDT 2015
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 7:56 PM, Bob Cochran <yocto at mindchasers.com> wrote:
> Thanks for all the info Otavio. I'm assuming your attention to meta-fsl-arm
> is primarily for i.MX. Please let me know if you are also testing LS1 (e.g.,
> ls1021a-twr) now using meta-fsl-arm.
We have it building in our autobuilder but it is also failing.
> And I still need to figure out which repo(s) I should use to most
> effectively develop & test with the changes coming for Yocto 1.9. I think I
> want to work with the github meta-freescale repo, especially since I need to
> build images for both ARM and Power. Please let me know if you disagree and
> think I'm just asking for headaches due to a lack of stability.
> Asking another way, are people testing against the github meta-freescale
> repo / layer?
meta-freescale is the future, it seems. How far is it, this is the question.
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
More information about the meta-freescale