[meta-freescale] [PATCH v2 2/5] ls-debug: add recipe

Edward L Swarthout ed.swarthout at freescale.com
Wed Aug 19 13:57:07 PDT 2015

From: Luo Zhenhua
>> From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br]
>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Luo Zhenhua wrote:
>> >> From: Otavio Salvador [mailto:otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br]
>> >> I disagree. It should be ls1021a SoCs not the TWR board only.
>> > [Luo Zhenhua-B19537] ls1021a family only has one supported
>> board(ls1021atwr) currently, it is identical to use ls1021a SOCs and 
>> ls1021atwr at this time. We can change to ls1021a SOCs when multiple 
>> boards of ls1021a are supported by this package.
>> That is a very serious misconception on the BSP design. We do the 
>> layer development for custom board to be easier to be supported and 
>> Freescale having one board does not mean others cannot reuse the 
>> components for their boards development.  Every BSP component should 
>> be designed with reusability in mind and this is reduces the time to 
>> market development and speeds the development being critical for customers.
>I agree with your point on components reusability. 
> We can't guarantee that this package can work well on 3rd party's boards of same SOC,
> so it is better to add the new board in the COMPATIBLE_MACHINE after verification. 

How can a different board break this SOC kernel feature?
Why should I have to touch any recipe to enable the ls-debug feature on my ls1021aqds board?


More information about the meta-freescale mailing list