[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm] Build for SabreSD?

Gary Thomas gary at mlbassoc.com
Tue Apr 7 06:26:46 PDT 2015

On 2015-04-07 07:16, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello Gary,
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Gary Thomas <gary at mlbassoc.com> wrote:
>> I'm trying to build for SabreSD using the current master:
>>    MACHINE           = "imx6qsabresd"
>>    meta              = "master:9e4adec98db325112ca7a8b9dd95722d4d0ab642"
>>    meta-fsl-arm      = "master:bfe01a0ebde407086f4a7710ea165c6beff310d7"
>>    meta-fsl-arm-extra = "master:49843fbd4cdfcdd37ad191dbf4bdc63e06cf1e0e"
>> Out of the box, I get this error/warning:
>> ERROR: Multiple .bb files are due to be built which each provide
>> virtual/kernel
>> (/local/poky-master/meta-fsl-arm/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-imx-rt_3.10.31.bb
>> /local/poky-master/meta-fsl-arm/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc_3.19.bb).
>>   This usually means one provides something the other doesn't and should.
> I will check.
>> Which kernel should this board use?  Is it compatible with
>> the latest (3.10.53 based) graphics?
> The 3.10.53 kernel works fine with SabreSD.

Which one and how do I select it?

>> n.b. I'm chasing some i.MX6 HDMI video issues and trying to use
>> this board as a reference.
> Oh, those... Nitrogen has got 3.10.53 last days as well.

The main issue I want to work on is I have some i.MX6 boards that
do HDMI well (video at least), e.g. the SabreLite from Boundary Devices,
but other boards that don't (boards from a company I work with - the
video is overscanned and doesn't fit the monitor).  I'd like to
see how the SabreSD does on this so maybe we can figure out where
the differences are.

Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world

More information about the meta-freescale mailing list