[meta-freescale] [Documentation][PATCH 07/14] RN: machines-maintainers.rst: typo fixes
Mario Domenech Goulart
mario at ossystems.com.br
Wed Apr 30 05:56:42 PDT 2014
Signed-off-by: Mario Domenech Goulart <mario at ossystems.com.br>
release-notes/source/machines-maintainers.inc | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/release-notes/source/machines-maintainers.inc b/release-notes/source/machines-maintainers.inc
index 708f16a..91737d6 100644
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
-Since FSL Community BSP Release 1.6 (Daisy) the maintainer field in machine configuration file of
+Since FSL Community BSP Release 1.6 (Daisy), the maintainer field in machine configuration file of
meta-fsl-arm and meta-fsl-arm-extra machines is mandatory for any new board to be added.
So now on, every new board must have someone assigned as maintainer.
-This ensures, in long term, all board with a maintainer assigned.
+This ensures, in long term, all boards with a maintainer assigned.
Current orphan boards are not going to be removed unless it causes maintenance
-problem and the fix is not straighforward.
+problem and the fix is not straightforward.
The maintainer duties:
* The one with casting vote when a deadlock is faced.
@@ -17,9 +17,9 @@ The maintainer duties:
* Keep test cycle updated
* Keep the most usual images building and booting
-When a build error is faced, the maintainer will "fix" it. For those maintainers with kernel control (meta-fsl-arm-extra)
-is expected that they properly fix the kernel issue (when it´s a kernel issue). However anything out of community control
-should be workrounded anyway.
+When a build error is faced, the maintainer will "fix" it. For those maintainers with kernel control (meta-fsl-arm-extra),
+it is expected that they properly fix the kernel issue (when it's a kernel issue). However anything out of community control
+should be worked around anyway.
Machines with maintainers
More information about the meta-freescale