[meta-freescale] MT9T111/MT9T112 aptina camera driver in linux-imx
akcooper8 at gmail.com
Wed Mar 20 09:36:19 PDT 2013
ahhh...ok so I think I will have to port the mt9t112 driver to freescale's
way of doing things, namely in the drivers/media/video/mxc/capture since
freescale is not using soc_camera.
On a somewhat related question, what is this "imx-devel" branch about?:
I see all kinds of references to imx-devel and v3.x.y.imx-devel here. How
come this is all the way up to 3.8 while Freescale is still on 3.0.35.
Something doesn't seem right!
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Eric Bénard <eric at eukrea.com> wrote:
> Hi Ashwin,
> Le Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:53:41 -0400,
> Ashwin Kirpalani <akcooper8 at gmail.com> a écrit :
> > Browsing around freescale's linux-imx sources, I noticed that the correct
> > version of the driver that I want (mt9t112.c) is indeed in the linux-imx
> > sources from freescale. It is here:
> > https://github.com/Freescale/linux-imx/tree/master/drivers/media/video.
> > why is it not the same in yocto's linux-imx-3-0-35 version? Could someone
> > please explain how yocto's version diverges from freescale's kernel
> > and why? Thanks
> at least 2 reasons :
> - this tree is not an officiel Freescale one despite the Freescale name
> of the github account,
> - you are looking at the master branch which is mainline, when the
> patch collection branches for Freescale's kernels are in branch
> patches-imx-2.6.35_10.12.01 and patches-imx-2.6.35_11.09.01
> If you want the kernels from Freescale you can have a look here
> (especially the imx_ branches) :
> Best regards
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the meta-freescale