[meta-freescale] Please review the proposal of FSL Yocto layers reorg - updated version on 28-Feb
msm-oss at mcclintock.net
Fri Mar 1 08:19:47 PST 2013
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Wang Larry-B38019 <B38019 at freescale.com> wrote:
> Sorry for responding late for the previous version. We still need consider the concerns we have about meta-fsl-arm vs meta-fsl-imx/meta-fsl-vybrid. Freescale can make more ARM based processors. It will be hard to put all of them under one umbrella.
Core board support under one layer is not that hard. It should only be
adding a machine file, and maybe a new kernel / u-boot recipe (or
maybe just pointing at a different SHA/SRC_URI).
Most other stuff will live in a vybrid layer that adds all the
ancillary support recipes.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Luo Zhenhua-B19537
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 12:17 AM
> To: Otavio Salvador; Bob Cochran; McClintock Matthew-B29882
> Cc: Li Yi i.MX-R80015; Mahadevan Mahesh-R9AADQ; Weng White-B18292; Angolini Daiane-B19406; Wang Larry-B38019; Liu Ting-B28495; Schmitt Richard-B43082; Trefny Thomas-RAT188; meta-freescale at yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Please review the proposal of FSL Yocto layers reorg - updated version on 28-Feb
> Hello all,
> Thanks a lot for the comments.
> I did some update according to the feedback and removed some bits of internal activity. Please review and comment.
> Best Regards,
> meta-freescale mailing list
> meta-freescale at yoctoproject.org
More information about the meta-freescale