[meta-freescale] Fwd: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 1/3] u-boot: Rename recipe to u-boot-fsl
B29882 at freescale.com
Wed Dec 19 11:35:04 PST 2012
Can we differentiate from u-boot fsl arm and ppc? Different teams
produce the two versions.
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Otavio Salvador
<otavio at ossystems.com.br> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Daiane Angolini <daiane.list at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Otavio Salvador
>> <otavio at ossystems.com.br> wrote:
>>> So Andrei can reword the commit log (not suggesting BSP X or Y are
>>> right or wrong) but renaming for clearness. Can we go this route?
>> I´m happy you decided what was the main problem of this situation.
>> Now I need to know how to name "linux-mainline". I´ve been cooking 3.7
>> recipe and I will send a patch in a while. I want to know how to name
> I'd say for you to call it linux-fslc as proposed for u-boot as well.
> So we'll be consistent regarding the recipes that use github as
>> I still think it´s weird not having a "u-boot" and a "linux" recipe. I
>> was looking around other meta layers and everyone have it.
>> In the other hand, meta-fsl-arm does support 2 u-boots and 2 kernels
>> (mainline and FSL), so, maybe having a description name for both would
>> be better.
> Yes; that's my thought too. I like to be clear about where to source
> come from and generic names goes in opposed direction.
> Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
> E-mail: otavio at ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
> Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
> meta-freescale mailing list
> meta-freescale at yoctoproject.org
More information about the meta-freescale