[linux-yocto] [PATCH v2 0/4][3.10][meta] MinnowBoard and Wifi updates
dvhart at linux.intel.com
Tue Nov 12 13:27:50 PST 2013
On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 15:59 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 13-11-11 06:25 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> > The following changes since commit f1c9080cd27f99700fa59b5375d1ddd0afe625ad:
> > meta/common-pc: add missing dependencies for BRCMSMAC (2013-11-03 23:01:35 -0500)
> > are available in the git repository at:
> > git://git.yoctoproject.org/linux-yocto-contrib dvhart/3.10/meta
> > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/linux-yocto-contrib/log/?h=dvhart/3.10/meta
> > Darren Hart (4):
> > minnow: Remove eg20t
> > minnow-io: Add feature for MinnowBoard GPIO keys and LEDs
> > minnow: Remove old patches for Ethernet and GPIO
> To confirm. We still want standard/minnow to contain these changes ?
> That's what the meta data tells me, but I wanted to be sure.
No, the new BSP will use standard/base. There is no real need to have a
standard/minnow branch as far as I can see.
I suppose ultimately the BSP branches from standard/base and then
applies the minnow-io feature, but that is meant to be optional at the
BSP (recipe-space) level.
I'd like *ALL* Intel BSPs to ultimately build from standard/base.
So - is there any reason to have standard/minnow lying around? I've
removed it from my test builds.
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
More information about the linux-yocto