Date
1 - 6 of 6
Honister broken WiFi communication
JH
Hi,
Has anyone successfully built a Linux image by Honister to run WiFi driver, connman and wpa_supplicant for WiFi interface? I could build an image by Zeus to run WiFi driver, wpa_supplicant, connman and dbus well, but after upgrading to Honister, the Linux image building was fie, but the WiFi is now broken, the WiFi failed to respond DHCP the WiFi could not connect to Internet, something is broken between wpa_supplicant and connman which setting kernel WiFi driver, WiFi interface and connection. I don't see any issues in kernel WiFi driver, connman and wpa_supplicant, something missing in the Linux image failing to set up the WiF network interface. Appreciate your comments. Thank you. Kind regards, - jupiter
|
|
Hi JH, On Tue, Jan 18, 2022, 01:54 JH <jupiter.hce@...> wrote: Hi, Yes, I have, but with Network Manager instead of connman. WiFi works just fine.
There are a lot of pieces in the chain and it is not obvious from your description where it is broken. If you run ifconfig -a does your WiFi interface show up? If not there is an issue with the driver. Use dmesg and filter for the driver. Often a driver cannot load the firmware. What is your WiFi hardware? Did you install the regulatory database? What error messages are you seeing when attempting to connect to a WiFi network? Did you look at the connman logs?
|
|
JH
Hi Rudolf,
Thanks for your response and comments. If you run ifconfig -a does your WiFi interface show up? If not there is anNot that bad, the WiFi interfaces was fine, but it could not get dhcp response and IP address so an automatic private IP address 169.254 was assigned mlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr D4:CA:6E:A4:E8:B4 inet addr:169.254.193.101 Bcast:169.254.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:56 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:330 (330.0 B) TX bytes:16392 (16.0 KiB) I could see WiFi information well, it is not a major problem, but the subtle issues are connman and wpa_supplicant did not set up the WiFi driver correctly. Connected to 34:08:04:12:b1:a2 (on mlan0) SSID: JupiterIoT freq: 2437 RX: 660 bytes (4 packets) TX: 46622 bytes (129 packets) signal: -57 dBm rx bitrate: 1.0 MBit/s tx bitrate: 72.2 MBit/s MCS 7 short GI bss flags: short-slot-time dtim period: 1 beacon int: 100 Did you install the regulatory database?Did you mean to enable CONFIG_CFG80211_INTERNAL_REGDB? No, I did not install it in the Zeus version either so I don't see that could be an issue. What error messages are you seeing when attempting to connect to a WiFiNo error in connman, I don't think it is connman or wpa_supplicant issue, my suspicion is something missing in Honister built image to prevent connman and wpa_supplicant to set up the WiFi driver correctly. It is not the first time I have the WiFi setup trouble to get WiFi 169.254 address, when I upgraded from Thud to Zeus, I got the exactly the same problem that WiFi was assigned by a 169.254 address, no dhcp response, at time, I was totally convinced it was connman issue, I spend several months to debug connman and wpa_supplicant without any results, then after waiting several months to pull updated Zeus again, that problem was disappeared miraculous, that is why I suspect the same problem in oe-core and bitbake in Honister as well. Are there anyone in oe-core and bitbake tested connman, wpa_supplicant for the current Honister branch? I can help to test and to debug it if more advanced people in oe-core, bitbake, kernel, WiFi driver mwifiex can provide me more information. Thank you. Kind regards, - jupiter
|
|
tomzy
Hi JH, Are you using custom Linux kernel / custom device tree? Maybe there is
Kind regards,
|
|
JH
Hi Tomasz,
Thanks for your response. Are you using custom Linux kernel / custom device tree? Maybe there isYes, but the Zeus build image uses the same device tree that could run WiFi connection without any issues, I am comparing the same source and configuration between Zeus and Honister, the only difference is the two different OE Yocto versions. Thank you. Kind regards, - jh
|
|
Hi JH,
On 1/18/22 5:45 PM, Jupiter wrote: Hi Rudolf,This would typically mean that you are actually connected to a wifi network but the interface did not receive a DHCP lease for the IP address. the 169.254. is local IPv4 IP address which the interface would typically get if the DHCP client times out. I could see WiFi information well, it is not a major problem, but theI don't think that this is a wpa_supplicant issue. However, you can use connmanctl to manually connect to a wifi network: $ connmanctl connmanctl> enable wifi connmanctl> scan wifi San completed for wifi connmanctl> services [service list follows] connmanctl> agent on Agent registered connmanctl> connect wifi_xxxxxx Agent RequestInput wifi_xxxxx Passphrase = [ Type=psk, Requirement=mandatory ] Passphrase? ******** Connected wifi_xxxxxx conmanctl> quit If that works the wifi authentication is OK. Only a wag on my side. Should be ok since the wifi driver is working.Did you install the regulatory database?Did you mean to enable CONFIG_CFG80211_INTERNAL_REGDB? No, I did not Well, ok then it looks like a dhcp issue. Did you attempt to set a static IP to test connectivity?What error messages are you seeing when attempting to connect to a WiFiNo error in connman, I don't think it is connman or wpa_supplicant Eventually it could be a router issue. Maybe the router blocks unknown devices? Are there anyone in oe-core and bitbake tested connman, wpa_supplicantHonestly, I don't think the issue is related to connman or wpa_supplicant at all but on the dhcp level. Thank you.-- Rudolf J Streif CEO/CTO ibeeto +1.855.442.3386 x700
|
|