Date
1 - 5 of 5
Invalid checksums for SRC_URI ignored?
|
Michael Opdenacker
Greetings,
I reused a simple "hello" recipe and added a non-matching checksum to it: ... SRC_URI = "file://helloworld.c" SRC_URI[md5sum] = "34f0efd76b4f18888888888833cdd129" ... The rest of the recipe comes from https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta-skeleton/recipes-skeleton/hello-single. Why doesn't Bitbake stop, reporting that the checksum doesn't match the source file? Anyway, why does the recipe build without a checksum? Shouldn't checksums be mandatory? I'm using the "master" version of Poky. Thanks in advance Michael. -- Michael Opdenacker, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
|
|
|
|
Ross Burton <ross@...>
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 at 12:16, Michael Opdenacker
<michael.opdenacker@...> wrote: Checksums are for files that are fetched via http:// and friends, not local files. Ross
|
|
|
|
Peter Bergin
Hi,
On 2022-01-19 13:16, Michael Opdenacker wrote: Greetings,No they are not mandatory for all fetchers. They are only used for content downloaded from non-local archives. https://docs.yoctoproject.org/bitbake/bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manual-fetching.html#the-download-fetch https://github.com/openembedded/bitbake/blob/32180d5057c818a69987aada482e82acf3c72ef2/lib/bb/fetch2/__init__.py#L1268 ^^ here you can see the selection of URI's that automatically needs a checksum. Best regards, /Peter
|
|
|
|
Michael Opdenacker
Peter, Ross
On 1/19/22 1:56 PM, Peter Bergin wrote: Hi, Thanks for your replies. This all makes perfect sense then. Thanks again Michael. -- Michael Opdenacker, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
|
|
|
|
Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2022-01-19 at 14:59 +0100, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
Peter, RossPersonally, I think where the checksums are present, we should check them regardless of url type though. I think I have an open bug related to this and the uninative fetching. Cheers, Richard
|
|
|