Date
1 - 5 of 5
[OE-core][PATCH v2] kernel-dummy: fix executing unexpected tasks
Andrej Valek <andrej.valek@...>
- correctly save files into sstate
- fix: ERROR: Task linux-dummy.do_fetch attempted to execute unexpectedly Signed-off-by: Andrej Valek <andrej.valek@...> --- meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-dummy.bb | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-dummy.bb b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-dummy.bb index 62cf6f5ea6..1498da392c 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-dummy.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-dummy.bb @@ -5,10 +5,12 @@ where you wish to build the kernel externally from the build system." SECTION = "kernel" LICENSE = "GPLv2" -LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://${WORKDIR}/COPYING.GPL;md5=751419260aa954499f7abaabaa882bbe" +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING.GPL;md5=751419260aa954499f7abaabaa882bbe" PROVIDES += "virtual/kernel" +inherit deploy + PACKAGES_DYNAMIC += "^kernel-module-.*" PACKAGES_DYNAMIC += "^kernel-image-.*" PACKAGES_DYNAMIC += "^kernel-firmware-.*" @@ -60,6 +62,6 @@ do_deploy() { } addtask bundle_initramfs after do_install before do_deploy -addtask deploy after do_install +addtask deploy after do_populate_sysroot do_packagedata addtask shared_workdir after do_compile before do_install addtask compile_kernelmodules -- 2.11.0
|
|
Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2020-11-25 at 18:20 +0100, Andrej Valek wrote:
- correctly save files into sstateIs this a leftover from the previous version of the patch? We don't normally need those constraints? Cheers, Richard
|
|
Andrej Valek <andrej.valek@...>
Hello Richard,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
No it's not a leftover. I've just copied it from kernel.bbclass, where this task is written correctly. But you can change it to previous version I guess. Regards, Andrej
On Wed, 2020-11-25 at 18:20 +0100, Andrej Valek wrote:- correctly save files into sstateIs this a leftover from the previous version of the patch? We don't normally need those constraints?
|
|
Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2020-11-26 at 14:44 +0000, Valek, Andrej wrote:
No it's not a leftover. I've just copied it from kernel.bbclass,I'm trying to work out why we need the extra dependencies when the tasks are empty. I can see how adding the inherit would help, I'm less sure how adding the deploy task after the others does though. Cheers, Richard
|
|
Andrej Valek <andrej.valek@...>
No problem, you can keep the deploy task dependency, like it was.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Regards, Andrej
On Thu, 2020-11-26 at 14:44 +0000, Valek, Andrej wrote:No it's not a leftover. I've just copied it from kernel.bbclass, whereI'm trying to work out why we need the extra dependencies when the tasks are empty.
|
|