Hi,

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 01:37:19AM -0800, Armando Hernandez wrote:

Hello,

I have a recipe that builds a library. The recipe specifies an additional package "${PN}-systemd" along with other systemd related variables and finally it instructs that the package should be built with "-DWITH_SYSTEMD=ON" being passed to cmake. So far so good. But, I extended this recipe to nativesdk because I need this library on it. When trying to build the corresponding nativesdk package, the build fails at the configuration step (i.e. "do_configure") claiming it cannot find the package systemd.

Is there a way I can install the -already-generated libraries into my SDK (potentially via the corresponding nativesdk recipe) without having to rebuild the package? Or do I need to somehow include such systemd package in my sdk (which I don't think I need at all)?

Any hints and pointers as to were to look at are very well appreciated.
Thanks.

Make the systemd dependency for target only, e.g. DEPENDS_class-target += "systemd"
etc.

There may be relevant use cases to build some of systemd components or tools
to native or nativesdk targets too. In that case add BBCLASSEXTEND += "nativesdk" etc
in a bbappend to systemd.

Hope this helps,

-Mikko

Hi,

(lets keep this on the list too)

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 04:51:18PM +0100, Armando Hernandez wrote:

Hi Mikko,

Thanks for your reply. I checked your suggestion but does not work for me.
I did included a .bbappend file in which I:

- re-set EXTRA_OECMAKE to an empty string (i.e. ""). - my intention was
to pass no arguments when building the nativesdk. Now I know that this
accion overwrites the value of EXTRA_OECMAKE in the original .bb file
- added the line BBCLASSEXTEND = "nativesdk" to this new .bbappend file
- added the line DEPENDS_class-target += "systemd" to the original .bb
file

I found out that this configures both the target and the nativesdk
libraries without systemd - which later on causes a failure when bitbake
attempts to pull up everything to create the final image.

Basically, I'd like to find a way to unset or overwrite the following
variables when building the nativesdk package:

- SYSTEMD_PACKAGES
- SYSTEMD_SERVICE_${PN}
- SYSTEMD_AUTO_ENABLE_${PN}
- SYSTEMD_SERVICE_${PN}-systemd
- SYSTEMD_AUTO_ENABLE_${PN}-systemd
- EXTRA_OECMAKE

You can add _class-[target|native|nativesdk] to all variables
to override defaults.

Verify with "bitbake -e".

Hope this helps,

-Mikko

Is it possible to do so? Or do I come up with another recipe of the sama
package exclusively for the nativesdk?

Thanks again.

Armando Hernandez

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:44 AM <Mikko.Rapeli@bmw.de> wrote:

Hi,

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 01:37:19AM -0800, Armando Hernandez wrote:

Hello,

I have a recipe that builds a library. The recipe specifies an

additional package "${PN}-systemd" along with other systemd related
variables and finally it instructs that the package should be built with
"-DWITH_SYSTEMD=ON" being passed to cmake. So far so good. But, I extended
this recipe to nativesdk because I need this library on it. When trying to
build the corresponding nativesdk package, the build fails at the
configuration step (i.e. "do_configure") claiming it cannot find the
package systemd.

Is there a way I can install the -already-generated libraries into my

SDK (potentially via the corresponding nativesdk recipe) without having to
rebuild the package? Or do I need to somehow include such systemd package
in my sdk (which I don't think I need at all)?

Any hints and pointers as to were to look at are very well appreciated.
Thanks.

Make the systemd dependency for target only, e.g. DEPENDS_class-target +=
"systemd"
etc.

There may be relevant use cases to build some of systemd components or
tools
to native or nativesdk targets too. In that case add BBCLASSEXTEND +=
"nativesdk" etc
in a bbappend to systemd.

Hope this helps,

-Mikko

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:57:41PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:

DEPENDS_class-target += "systemd"

You surely meant
DEPENDS_append_class-target = " systemd"
here

Yes, quite likely. Tough reason why += doesn't work is a mystery to me :)

I hack things until "bitbake -e" shows the right things for the recipes.

-Mikko

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:48 PM Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@bmw.de> wrote:

Hi,

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 01:37:19AM -0800, Armando Hernandez wrote:

Hello,

I have a recipe that builds a library. The recipe specifies an

additional package "${PN}-systemd" along with other systemd related
variables and finally it instructs that the package should be built with
"-DWITH_SYSTEMD=ON" being passed to cmake. So far so good. But, I extended
this recipe to nativesdk because I need this library on it. When trying to
build the corresponding nativesdk package, the build fails at the
configuration step (i.e. "do_configure") claiming it cannot find the
package systemd.

Is there a way I can install the -already-generated libraries into my

SDK (potentially via the corresponding nativesdk recipe) without having to
rebuild the package? Or do I need to somehow include such systemd package
in my sdk (which I don't think I need at all)?

Any hints and pointers as to were to look at are very well appreciated.
Thanks.

Make the systemd dependency for target only, e.g. DEPENDS_class-target +=
"systemd"
etc.

There may be relevant use cases to build some of systemd components or
tools
to native or nativesdk targets too. In that case add BBCLASSEXTEND +=
"nativesdk" etc
in a bbappend to systemd.

Hope this helps,

-Mikko

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 08:14:04AM +0000, Mikko.Rapeli@bmw.de wrote:

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:57:41PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:

DEPENDS_class-target += "systemd"

You surely meant
DEPENDS_append_class-target = " systemd"
here

Yes, quite likely. Tough reason why += doesn't work is a mystery to me :)

I hack things until "bitbake -e" shows the right things for the recipes.

I agree it's a bit confusing at first (I was doing the same long time
ago, before bitbake -e was even showing the history of evaluation), but
everybody who uses bitbake often should learn this simple difference:

FOO_append_override = " bar"
is "conditional" append, so it will append "bar" only when "override" is
being used

FOO_override += "bar"
always appends to "FOO_override" and then it overrides whole "FOO" variable

There are other more subtle differences like "+=" adds leading space,
_append doesn't and _append is processed later (which is important when
appending to variable set with ?=), but the above difference is a must
to know.

Also
FOO_append += "bar"
is just silly way how to add leading space to the value, one should
always use
FOO_append = " bar"
when appending to space separated list (like DEPENDS).

Cheers,

-Mikko

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:48 PM Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@bmw.de> wrote:

Hi,

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 01:37:19AM -0800, Armando Hernandez wrote:

Hello,

I have a recipe that builds a library. The recipe specifies an

additional package "${PN}-systemd" along with other systemd related
variables and finally it instructs that the package should be built with
"-DWITH_SYSTEMD=ON" being passed to cmake. So far so good. But, I extended
this recipe to nativesdk because I need this library on it. When trying to
build the corresponding nativesdk package, the build fails at the
configuration step (i.e. "do_configure") claiming it cannot find the
package systemd.

Is there a way I can install the -already-generated libraries into my

SDK (potentially via the corresponding nativesdk recipe) without having to
rebuild the package? Or do I need to somehow include such systemd package
in my sdk (which I don't think I need at all)?

Any hints and pointers as to were to look at are very well appreciated.
Thanks.

Make the systemd dependency for target only, e.g. DEPENDS_class-target +=
"systemd"
etc.

There may be relevant use cases to build some of systemd components or
tools
to native or nativesdk targets too. In that case add BBCLASSEXTEND +=
"nativesdk" etc
in a bbappend to systemd.

Hope this helps,

-Mikko

Hi,

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 12:55:43PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 08:14:04AM +0000, Mikko.Rapeli@bmw.de wrote:

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:57:41PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:

DEPENDS_class-target += "systemd"

You surely meant
DEPENDS_append_class-target = " systemd"
here

Yes, quite likely. Tough reason why += doesn't work is a mystery to me :)

I hack things until "bitbake -e" shows the right things for the recipes.

I agree it's a bit confusing at first (I was doing the same long time
ago, before bitbake -e was even showing the history of evaluation), but
everybody who uses bitbake often should learn this simple difference:

FOO_append_override = " bar"
is "conditional" append, so it will append "bar" only when "override" is
being used

FOO_override += "bar"
always appends to "FOO_override" and then it overrides whole "FOO" variable

Thanks for this explanation!

There are other more subtle differences like "+=" adds leading space,
_append doesn't and _append is processed later (which is important when
appending to variable set with ?=), but the above difference is a must
to know.

Also
FOO_append += "bar"
is just silly way how to add leading space to the value, one should
always use
FOO_append = " bar"
when appending to space separated list (like DEPENDS).

Hmm. I would rather see FOO_append += "bar" being used every time when
spaces are expected. It's way too easy to forget the extra space which causes
annoying and hard to debug issues, and is often missed in reviews too.

Cheers,

-Mikko