Date
1 - 3 of 3
what's the state of building for a (OMAP4460) pandaboard ES?
Robert P. J. Day
i notice that the current meta-ti layer has a pandaboard.conf file
that refers specifically to the OMAP 4430 -- the original panda.
this weekend, i'd like to build, say, a core-image-minimal for my ES.
is there a writeup anywhere that documents what issues i might run
into regarding the panda versus the panda ES? thanks.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
that refers specifically to the OMAP 4430 -- the original panda.
this weekend, i'd like to build, say, a core-image-minimal for my ES.
is there a writeup anywhere that documents what issues i might run
into regarding the panda versus the panda ES? thanks.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
Paul Eggleton
On Tuesday 31 July 2012 06:43:17 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
meta-ti mailing list.
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
i notice that the current meta-ti layer has a pandaboard.conf fileI'm not sure but I think you probably need to direct this question to the
that refers specifically to the OMAP 4430 -- the original panda.
this weekend, i'd like to build, say, a core-image-minimal for my ES.
is there a writeup anywhere that documents what issues i might run
into regarding the panda versus the panda ES? thanks.
meta-ti mailing list.
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
William Mills <wmills@...>
On 07/31/2012 11:06 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
I hope to get panda on the list of platforms for nightly (or at least weekly) builds. That way the status will be visible.
On Tuesday 31 July 2012 06:43:17 Robert P. J. Day wrote:I did see this question, I just don't have an answer. We are seeing if we can get a part time maintainer for panda lined up. Right now it is just something a few volunteers did a few months ago. There are no product level plans for panda and Yocto.i notice that the current meta-ti layer has a pandaboard.conf fileI'm not sure but I think you probably need to direct this question to the
that refers specifically to the OMAP 4430 -- the original panda.
this weekend, i'd like to build, say, a core-image-minimal for my ES.
is there a writeup anywhere that documents what issues i might run
into regarding the panda versus the panda ES? thanks.
meta-ti mailing list.
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
I hope to get panda on the list of platforms for nightly (or at least weekly) builds. That way the status will be visible.