Date
1 - 8 of 8
runqemu qemux86
Jim Abernathy
when testing an image using runqemu qemux86, can you get networking to work?? mine comes up disabled. I want to test an application that requires Internet access.
Jim A |
|
Autif Khan <autif.mlist@...>
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:43 AM, jfabernathy <jfabernathy@...> wrote:
when testing an image using runqemu qemux86, can you get networking toYes, I am able to get networking to work out of the box (bitbake core-image-sato, etc.) Internetworking does not work out of the box. This is accomplished over tun/tap devices - I do not know much about these virtual networking devices - they have never failed for me :-) The IP address of the emulated machine is 192.168.7.2 - The IP address of host machine is 192.168.7.1 You can not (out of the box) communicate with machines other than the host machine - so that would included internet etc. So, if you have an ssh server or a web-server running on the host machine - you can ssh to the host machine or browse a webpage using the browser. Alternatively, you can run a proxy server on the build machine and use it to get to the internet. You can run ifconfig to see if the network is configured properly on the emulated machine in the terminal. It should show 192.168.7.2 - if you do not see this - you do not have networking working. |
|
Jim Abernathy
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Autif Khan <autif.mlist@...> wrote:
I can see the tap0 interface on my host at 192.168.7.1 by using ifconfig. I can also see the eth0 on the qemu machine at 192.168.7.2
However, my host has an ip of 10.0.1.54 with a AP gateway at 10.0.1.1.
Somehow I need to connect the networks and I'm not sure exactly how to do that so that DNS servers get used and the traffic all flows.
Jim A
|
|
Scott Garman <scott.a.garman@...>
On 05/22/2012 08:15 AM, James Abernathy wrote:
There is some sort of routing or IP forwarding bug in the sato images that is due to be fixed soon. One thing I've found is you can actually get out to the internet for about 30 seconds or so immediately after the image boots. My suspicion is that some conman script is killing the route after boot. core-image-minimal works consistently, and since minimal doesn't use conman, I'm guessing that is the culprit. https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2329 Scott -- Scott Garman Embedded Linux Engineer - Yocto Project Intel Open Source Technology Center |
|
Jim Abernathy
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Scott Garman <scott.a.garman@...> wrote:
So if I read this right, I don't need any route or bridge commands to make this work. If the bug gets fixed runqemu qemux86 should setup the environment correctly so the web-webkit should get out to the internet via the host machine connection?
JIm A
-- |
|
Scott Garman <scott.a.garman@...>
On 05/22/2012 10:26 AM, James Abernathy wrote:
Correct. I'm hesitant to say this, but I'm hoping to have the bug fixed and patch submitted by the end of this week. Hopefully I haven't just jinxed myself. :) Scott -- Scott Garman Embedded Linux Engineer - Yocto Project Intel Open Source Technology Center |
|
Jim Abernathy
On 05/22/2012 01:42 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
On 05/22/2012 10:26 AM, James Abernathy wrote:I did try it out on core-image-minimal and I can ping anything I have the IP for. Not sure how you get the DNS connections working in qeum.Correct. JIm A Scott |
|
Scott Garman <scott.a.garman@...>
On 05/22/2012 10:45 AM, jfabernathy wrote:
Since we use a static IP configuration for the QEMU sessions, /etc/resolv.conf isn't populated with a nameserver. If you enter one, it should work.I did try it out on core-image-minimal and I can ping anything I havehttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.__org/show_bug.cgi?id=2329Correct. I'm not sure if there is something we can/should use as a default DNS setup that would work for all our end users. OpenDNS? Google's nameservers? Scott -- Scott Garman Embedded Linux Engineer - Yocto Project Intel Open Source Technology Center |
|