Date
1 - 4 of 4
some observations about yocto wiki page, "from git checkout to meta-intel BSP"
Robert P. J. Day
yes, i know it's an editable wiki but i'd rather someone else make
the changes just in case i'm misreading something. it's early, and there's only decaf in the place. this is bad. anyway, using this page as grist for discussion: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Transcript:_from_git_checkout_to_meta-intel_BSP "To build and run a meta-intel BSP, you need to check out a local copy of the poky repo ..." i think that sentence demonstrates the yocto vs poky confusion koen was talking about -- a regular waffling between "yocto" sources and "poky" repos. below that, there are references to git://git.pokylinux.org/poky.git -- should those references be updated to refer to the git.yoctoproject.org repos? there's a reference to "poky-qemu qemux86" -- change to "runqemu qemux86"? or is that the correct name in the last released version? (i rarely look at released versions.) and i'm pretty sure that there's a missing reference to the meta-yocto layer here: BBLAYERS = " \ /usr/local/src/Yocto/meta \ /usr/local/src/Yocto/meta-intel/meta-fishriver \ " unless that's also correct for the last released version. further down, $ bitbake poky-image-sato-live there's no such bitbake target these days. anyway, that was about 60 seconds worth of perusing. if some meta-intel person wants to mess with that page, it's all yours. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday ======================================================================== |
|
David Stewart
Yeah, the example is pretty old, dating back to the 1.0 (bernard) release.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Tom - it might be time to retire it, you think? -----Original Message----- |
|
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...>
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 08:09 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
yes, i know it's an editable wiki but i'd rather someone else makeYeah, just because poky appears in the URL doesn't mean we need to reference it beyond that. below that, there are references toYeah, definitely, I need to update these pages for for edison, which I'll do now that I know somebody's actually making use of them. Thanks for your comments... Tom rday |
|
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...>
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 16:14 +0000, Stewart, David C wrote:
Yeah, the example is pretty old, dating back to the 1.0 (bernard) release.Apparently, they're still useful to people, so I think updating rather than retiring them makes more sense at this point (or they or something similar get merged into the Developer's guide? For now, it's a relatively small effort to update them, and we can decide whether to move them later, I'm thinking). Tom -----Original Message-----_______________________________________________ |
|