Date
1 - 8 of 8
why does quick start guide refer to non-provided "poky-image-sato"?
|
Robert P. J. Day
maybe i'm misreading something, but the yocto QS guide provides the
sample command: $ bitbake -k poky-image-sato however, nothing provides that target. i can see the git log entry: commit 1947b17478187bb623da74484747e470ce42d206 Author: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@...> Date: Tue May 10 12:50:36 2011 -0500 documentation/yocto-project-qs/yocto-project-qs.xml: changed build command The command used in the example to build an image was using 'bitbake core-image-sato', which is only available in master and not Bernard. So, I changed the command to be 'bitbake poky-image-sato' at Dave Stewart's request. He located and pointed out the error. (From yocto-docs rev: 3fa83550aaec5a3549825814a77fa7a823a2daea) Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@...> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...> but it seems that "core-image-sato" is perfectly valid, at least at the moment. clarification? rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday ======================================================================== |
|
|
|
Rifenbark, Scott M <scott.m.rifenbark@...>
Robert,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
My understanding was that the target for this sample command could not be 'core-image-sato' for the QS version on the website, which supports Bernard. Maybe someone out there has a bit more information on details to your question. ScottR -----Original Message-----
From: yocto-bounces@... [mailto:yocto-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Robert P. J. Day Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 2:32 PM To: Yocto discussion list Subject: [yocto] why does quick start guide refer to non-provided "poky-image-sato"? maybe i'm misreading something, but the yocto QS guide provides the sample command: $ bitbake -k poky-image-sato however, nothing provides that target. i can see the git log entry: commit 1947b17478187bb623da74484747e470ce42d206 Author: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@...> Date: Tue May 10 12:50:36 2011 -0500 documentation/yocto-project-qs/yocto-project-qs.xml: changed build command The command used in the example to build an image was using 'bitbake core-image-sato', which is only available in master and not Bernard. So, I changed the command to be 'bitbake poky-image-sato' at Dave Stewart's request. He located and pointed out the error. (From yocto-docs rev: 3fa83550aaec5a3549825814a77fa7a823a2daea) Signed-off-by: Scott Rifenbark <scott.m.rifenbark@...> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...> but it seems that "core-image-sato" is perfectly valid, at least at the moment. clarification? rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday ======================================================================== _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@... https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto |
|
|
|
Robert P. J. Day
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
Robert,currently, scripts/oe-setup-builddir lists one of the common targets as "core-image-sato", so certainly *something* is out of sync. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday ======================================================================== |
|
|
|
Rifenbark, Scott M <scott.m.rifenbark@...>
Robert,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
What release of Yocto Project are you using? Scott -----Original Message-----
From: Robert P. J. Day [mailto:rpjday@...] Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 3:01 PM To: Rifenbark, Scott M Cc: Yocto discussion list Subject: RE: [yocto] why does quick start guide refer to non-provided "poky-image-sato"? On Thu, 14 Jul 2011, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote: Robert,currently, scripts/oe-setup-builddir lists one of the common targets as "core-image-sato", so certainly *something* is out of sync. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday ======================================================================== |
|
|
|
Joshua Lock <josh@...>
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 18:01 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:As I understand it documentation repository updates are reflected on theRobert,currently, scripts/oe-setup-builddir lists one of the common targets website so the docs tend to reflect the released version. It would be nice to be able to provide development & release documentation but I can't see it happening any time soon. Joshua -- Joshua Lock Yocto Project "Johannes Factotum" Intel Open Source Technology Centre |
|
|
|
Robert P. J. Day
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011, Joshua Lock wrote:
As I understand it documentation repository updates are reflected onok, that explains it but it doesn't defend it. IMHO, any single versioned tarball or repository checkout should always be internally consistent, and that includes embedded documentation. when i do a "git pull" of any software, i expect the contents of any docs/ directory to reflect what's there. if you want to publicly publish the docs that reflect the last official release, then build those docs from the appropriate git tag. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday ======================================================================== |
|
|
|
Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 19:10 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011, Joshua Lock wrote:I agree that the docs in master should reflect the code in master andAs I understand it documentation repository updates are reflected onok, that explains it but it doesn't defend it. IMHO, any single that the docs on the bernard branch should be the ones which make the bernard references. Which or both can end up on the website as needed which is a separate issue. I thought this had been fixed and Scott had two branches so what's going wrong? :/ Cheers, Richard |
|
|
|
Rifenbark, Scott M <scott.m.rifenbark@...>
I do have two branches (master and Bernard) in my yocto-docs contrib area. The master branch is used for updates to the upcoming release and is in various states of correctness/completeness. I guess I will need to take the time to do a push for every change I make to my local copy of yocto-docs master.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
The docs that are on the website are Bernard only until we release. ScottR -----Original Message-----
From: yocto-bounces@... [mailto:yocto-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Richard Purdie Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 4:15 PM To: Robert P. J. Day Cc: yocto@... Subject: Re: [yocto] why does quick start guide refer to non-provided "poky-image-sato"? On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 19:10 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Thu, 14 Jul 2011, Joshua Lock wrote:I agree that the docs in master should reflect the code in master andAs I understand it documentation repository updates are reflected onok, that explains it but it doesn't defend it. IMHO, any single that the docs on the bernard branch should be the ones which make the bernard references. Which or both can end up on the website as needed which is a separate issue. I thought this had been fixed and Scott had two branches so what's going wrong? :/ Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@... https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto |
|
|