Date
1 - 3 of 3
[poky] [PATCH 0/3] kernel: rename supported kernel to linux-yocto
|
Bruce Ashfield
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Darren Hart <dvhart@...> wrote:
On 11/15/2010 08:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:Hmmm. I was largely thinking about another patch series. The commit messagesFrom what I can tell these changes are not "bisectable" - the build would for these are pretty small. I've squashed and updated my contrib branch. Cheers, Bruce
-- "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end" |
|
|
|
Bruce Ashfield
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Darren Hart <dvhart@...> wrote:
On 11/15/2010 08:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:Definitely. Not bisectable, but I wanted to keep the changes logicallyFrom what I can tell these changes are not "bisectable" - the build would separated, since it allowed a commit message that wasn't too long to read and be useful. Since there are several recipe categories, boards and layers involved, I made the choice to split things up. I typically insist on bisectable series as well, but have made exceptions :) I'm happy to squash things though, if Richard wants them squashed I'll resend .. or it might be quicker to rebase and squash on merge, either works for me. Bruce
-- "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end" |
|
|
|
Darren Hart <dvhart@...>
On 11/15/2010 08:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
This is the first of several staged changes to update theFrom what I can tell these changes are not "bisectable" - the build would fail if all three are not applied. If I'm not missing something, I'd prefer to see these squashed into a single commit. -- Darren Hart Embedded Linux Kernel |
|
|