|
Recipe to install third-party RPM
#bitbake
Hello David, There is nothing really special compared to "usual" recipes or whatever you use RPM or another packager. In short: 1) You should create (likely in a layer of yours) the recipe for your "t
Hello David, There is nothing really special compared to "usual" recipes or whatever you use RPM or another packager. In short: 1) You should create (likely in a layer of yours) the recipe for your "t
|
By
Federico Pellegrin
· #58769
·
|
|
open ssh dunfell unable to login
Hi Michael, Sorry for the maybe obvious remark (and cannot find the original post if maybe you gave more details) but: did you enable in openssh daemon configuration to allow for root login? By defaul
Hi Michael, Sorry for the maybe obvious remark (and cannot find the original post if maybe you gave more details) but: did you enable in openssh daemon configuration to allow for root login? By defaul
|
By
Federico Pellegrin
· #58760
·
|
|
source-less python
Hello Alex, Just to go with some concrete numbers from a Buildroot example I have under my hands, with just very basic Python 3.10 support (so no additional modules, just what gets in with only BR2_PA
Hello Alex, Just to go with some concrete numbers from a Buildroot example I have under my hands, with just very basic Python 3.10 support (so no additional modules, just what gets in with only BR2_PA
|
By
Federico Pellegrin
· #58553
·
|
|
source-less python
Hello, Just as a small reference since I raised some doubts and questions in Buildroot community on this: there has been also some troubles to understand the correctness or not there (as I found some
Hello, Just as a small reference since I raised some doubts and questions in Buildroot community on this: there has been also some troubles to understand the correctness or not there (as I found some
|
By
Federico Pellegrin
· #58549
·
|
|
Apply Rt-Patch in raspberry yocto image
#patch
#rpi
#yocto
#bitbake
#dunfell
Hi, After applying the patch to the source, I suppose you built the kernel (and is just missing in your email) ? If not that is a quite important step missing ;) Besides that: 1) preempt-rt patch is o
Hi, After applying the patch to the source, I suppose you built the kernel (and is just missing in your email) ? If not that is a quite important step missing ;) Besides that: 1) preempt-rt patch is o
|
By
Federico Pellegrin
· #58336
·
|
|
[poky][PATCH] signing-keys: add RDEPENDS to signing-keys from specific provider
Specific provider (ie. RPM or IPK) does "provide" just itself as a package to the system. This will cause the "-dev" package, which refers to the generic signing-keys and not the provider specific, to
Specific provider (ie. RPM or IPK) does "provide" just itself as a package to the system. This will cause the "-dev" package, which refers to the generic signing-keys and not the provider specific, to
|
By
Federico Pellegrin
· #57342
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH] Remove outdated meta-rust dependency text in README
Hi Armin, Sorry if it was unclear or if I misunderstood something. As far as I could see and tried as I had to build it yesterday, I can now build suricata without adding meta-rust as the rust support
Hi Armin, Sorry if it was unclear or if I misunderstood something. As far as I could see and tried as I had to build it yesterday, I can now build suricata without adding meta-rust as the rust support
|
By
Federico Pellegrin
· #57268
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH] Remove outdated meta-rust dependency text in README
Since ~16 months the base of meta-rust was merged into meta-oe, down to honister as far as I can see, and therefore the indications to use meta-rust are really not needed and may just create extra wor
Since ~16 months the base of meta-rust was merged into meta-oe, down to honister as far as I can see, and therefore the indications to use meta-rust are really not needed and may just create extra wor
|
By
Federico Pellegrin
· #57258
·
|
|
Fedora 36 / uninative GLIBCXX 3.4.30
Hello, Thanks for the feedback! Indeed the check is only on the "ldd --version" output which doesn't account for the libstdc++ and that explains it. As compared to Ubuntu 22.04, Fedora 36 actually has
Hello, Thanks for the feedback! Indeed the check is only on the "ldd --version" output which doesn't account for the libstdc++ and that explains it. As compared to Ubuntu 22.04, Fedora 36 actually has
|
By
Federico Pellegrin
· #56653
·
|
|
Fedora 36 / uninative GLIBCXX 3.4.30
Hello, I've been playing around building a Yocto imagine based on kirkstone/master on the just released Fedora 36 beta test image. (just to give a few bits more details: builds a MX8X image, works per
Hello, I've been playing around building a Yocto imagine based on kirkstone/master on the just released Fedora 36 beta test image. (just to give a few bits more details: builds a MX8X image, works per
|
By
Federico Pellegrin
· #56647
·
|
|
[OE-core] Which vendors maintain SDIO WiFi in mainline stable kernel
Hi Jupiter, I cannot help you on the specific chip you ask, but responding to the second part of your question I have quite good experience with Microchip WILC1000/3000 on SDIO which, after a part sep
Hi Jupiter, I cannot help you on the specific chip you ask, but responding to the second part of your question I have quite good experience with Microchip WILC1000/3000 on SDIO which, after a part sep
|
By
Federico Pellegrin
· #56575
·
|
|
The "/etc/resolv.conf" file becomes empty after each restart
#yocto
Hello, Some more details would be needed (ie. you have systemd?), but this could be a good point to start: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Systemd-resolved (ie. see a bit down, like: https://wiki.arc
Hello, Some more details would be needed (ie. you have systemd?), but this could be a good point to start: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Systemd-resolved (ie. see a bit down, like: https://wiki.arc
|
By
Federico Pellegrin
· #55833
·
|
|
util-linux and --enable-raw with recent kernels
Thanks Khem! Indeed I checked on master but got cheated by the web git interface and I was looking at an older commit :-/ Glad it is the right way to go and already solved on master! Cheers, Federico
Thanks Khem! Indeed I checked on master but got cheated by the web git interface and I was looking at an older commit :-/ Glad it is the right way to go and already solved on master! Cheers, Federico
|
By
Federico Pellegrin
· #55045
·
|
|
util-linux and --enable-raw with recent kernels
Hello, Running on a quite recent kernel (5.14.10 from Fedora 34) I've came across a problem when building util-linux (2.35.2) native, namely in the configure phase: configure: error: raw selected, but
Hello, Running on a quite recent kernel (5.14.10 from Fedora 34) I've came across a problem when building util-linux (2.35.2) native, namely in the configure phase: configure: error: raw selected, but
|
By
Federico Pellegrin
· #55041
·
|
|
[OE-core] How to trigger Yocto Linux /etc/profile or shell scripts in /etc/profile.d without shell logging in?
Hi Jupiter, To centralize, agreed that you are using systemd, one way I could see is setting the variables in systemd-system.conf using the DefaultEnvironment directive, see: https://freedesktop.org/s
Hi Jupiter, To centralize, agreed that you are using systemd, one way I could see is setting the variables in systemd-system.conf using the DefaultEnvironment directive, see: https://freedesktop.org/s
|
By
Federico Pellegrin
· #55025
·
|
|
[OE-core] How to trigger Yocto Linux /etc/profile or shell scripts in /etc/profile.d without shell logging in?
Hi Jupiter, /etc/profile and similar are interactive shell (/bash) concepts, not really system startup ones. So indeed: just on a login (be it local, ssh and so on) they are executed. If you want to e
Hi Jupiter, /etc/profile and similar are interactive shell (/bash) concepts, not really system startup ones. So indeed: just on a login (be it local, ssh and so on) they are executed. If you want to e
|
By
Federico Pellegrin
· #55013
·
|
|
googletest shared library
Hi, Regarding the INSANE_SKIP: as that files get packed in the "-dev" package, you should probably then accordingly have: INSANE_SKIP_${PN}-dev += "dev-elf" Cheers, Federico
Hi, Regarding the INSANE_SKIP: as that files get packed in the "-dev" package, you should probably then accordingly have: INSANE_SKIP_${PN}-dev += "dev-elf" Cheers, Federico
|
By
Federico Pellegrin
· #54828
·
|
|
googletest shared library
Hi, To skip the QA you can use: INSANE_SKIP_${PN} += "dev-elf" (or any QA part you'd like to skip, ie. dev-elf or dev-so ...) Cheers, Federico
Hi, To skip the QA you can use: INSANE_SKIP_${PN} += "dev-elf" (or any QA part you'd like to skip, ie. dev-elf or dev-so ...) Cheers, Federico
|
By
Federico Pellegrin
· #54809
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH] aircrack-ng: update to 1.6
Signed-off-by: Federico Pellegrin <fede@...> --- .../{aircrack-ng_1.3.bb => aircrack-ng_1.6.bb} | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) rename recipes-security/aircrack-n
Signed-off-by: Federico Pellegrin <fede@...> --- .../{aircrack-ng_1.3.bb => aircrack-ng_1.6.bb} | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) rename recipes-security/aircrack-n
|
By
Federico Pellegrin
· #53883
·
|
|
[meta-gplv2][PATCH] gnutls: add possibility to build with cryptodev support
Add possibility, via PACKAGECONFIG variable, to enable cryptodev (hardware crypto acceleration) for gnutls in a very similar way as it is already present for openssl. Signed-off-by: Federico Pellegrin
Add possibility, via PACKAGECONFIG variable, to enable cryptodev (hardware crypto acceleration) for gnutls in a very similar way as it is already present for openssl. Signed-off-by: Federico Pellegrin
|
By
Federico Pellegrin
· #53336
·
|