|
Install Yocto image and backup
You don't need a full download. In the past I've used binary diffs with great success. So if the update size is your biggest concern, the tradeoff of computing and applying the binary diff might be wo
You don't need a full download. In the past I've used binary diffs with great success. So if the update size is your biggest concern, the tradeoff of computing and applying the binary diff might be wo
|
By
Richard Weinberger
· #51250
·
|
|
Disabling sshd is harder than it should be
Thanks a lot for your suggestion! But doesn't this line imply that recipes which don't supply systemd servies files won't work since the init.d scipt fallback will be disabled?
Thanks a lot for your suggestion! But doesn't this line imply that recipes which don't supply systemd servies files won't work since the init.d scipt fallback will be disabled?
|
By
Richard Weinberger
· #44935
·
|
|
Disabling sshd is harder than it should be
My thud based system installs openssh-sshd but I want to have sshd disabled by default. So I checked the docs how to disabled a systemd service by default and found SYSTEMD_AUTO_ENABLE, perfect. After
My thud based system installs openssh-sshd but I want to have sshd disabled by default. So I checked the docs how to disabled a systemd service by default and found SYSTEMD_AUTO_ENABLE, perfect. After
|
By
Richard Weinberger
· #44921
·
|
|
x86_64 kernel with i586 userland plus SDK?
Bruce, <richard.weinberger@...> wrote: I think I found the source if my confusion, the i686-poky-linux compiler *is* a biarch gcc but defaults to -m32. When I pass -m64 to it, it actually genera
Bruce, <richard.weinberger@...> wrote: I think I found the source if my confusion, the i686-poky-linux compiler *is* a biarch gcc but defaults to -m32. When I pass -m64 to it, it actually genera
|
By
Richard Weinberger
· #43552
·
|
|
x86_64 kernel with i586 userland plus SDK?
Bruce, <bruce.ashfield@...> wrote: If I understand the problem correctly, the root of the problem is that yocto "degrades" to i686. When I set DEFAULTTUNE to i586 for a 64bit machine I'd exp
Bruce, <bruce.ashfield@...> wrote: If I understand the problem correctly, the root of the problem is that yocto "degrades" to i686. When I set DEFAULTTUNE to i586 for a 64bit machine I'd exp
|
By
Richard Weinberger
· #43547
·
|
|
x86_64 kernel with i586 userland plus SDK?
Bruce, <bruce.ashfield@...> wrote: This was my plan, but yocto always create a 32bit toolchain when it set DEFAULTTUNE to i586 for a 64bit machine. Yes, it builds with i686-poky-linux. :-(
Bruce, <bruce.ashfield@...> wrote: This was my plan, but yocto always create a 32bit toolchain when it set DEFAULTTUNE to i586 for a 64bit machine. Yes, it builds with i686-poky-linux. :-(
|
By
Richard Weinberger
· #43545
·
|
|
x86_64 kernel with i586 userland plus SDK?
[Resending with correct mail] Richard, This was my hope, and this is also what I get when doing such builds manually. Having a x86_64 gcc and building userspace with "-m32" appended. Yocto seems to tr
[Resending with correct mail] Richard, This was my hope, and this is also what I get when doing such builds manually. Having a x86_64 gcc and building userspace with "-m32" appended. Yocto seems to tr
|
By
Richard Weinberger
· #43542
·
|
|
x86_64 kernel with i586 userland plus SDK?
<richard.purdie@...> wrote: I went this approach for now. That way I get i586 userland and an SDK with both 32bit and 64bit toolchains. The SDK offers me multiple environment files to
<richard.purdie@...> wrote: I went this approach for now. That way I get i586 userland and an SDK with both 32bit and 64bit toolchains. The SDK offers me multiple environment files to
|
By
Richard Weinberger
· #43540
·
|
|
x86_64 kernel with i586 userland plus SDK?
<richard.weinberger@...> wrote: *kind ping*
<richard.weinberger@...> wrote: *kind ping*
|
By
Richard Weinberger
· #43413
·
|
|
x86_64 kernel with i586 userland plus SDK?
Richard, <richard.purdie@...> wrote: My idea was having a 32bit only SDK. In my case I really don't need 64bit userspace. On the other hand, having both 32bit and 64bit libs in the SDK
Richard, <richard.purdie@...> wrote: My idea was having a 32bit only SDK. In my case I really don't need 64bit userspace. On the other hand, having both 32bit and 64bit libs in the SDK
|
By
Richard Weinberger
· #43395
·
|
|
x86_64 kernel with i586 userland plus SDK?
Hi! I have a hard time understanding how to build a distro with x86_64 kernel, i586 userland and an SDK for that. In the beginning I assumed and have been told on IRC that multilib is the way to go. B
Hi! I have a hard time understanding how to build a distro with x86_64 kernel, i586 userland and an SDK for that. In the beginning I assumed and have been told on IRC that multilib is the way to go. B
|
By
Richard Weinberger
· #43369
·
|