I suspect that at this point in the parse, the mulitlib code hasn't swizzled the bits around so it still looks like the main lib rather than the mutlilib. Including a variable in a require like that i

I have been scratching my head over building openjdk-8 with multilib for an aarch64 system. Essentially, I want to use 32-bit OpenJDK on the 64-bit system. Theoretically adding to local.conf require c

All, YP M+ or high bugs which moved to a new milestone in WW04 are listed below: Priority Bug ID Short Description Changer Owner Was Became Medium+ 13888 Toaster is not starting for Django-3 randy.mac

All, The below were the owners of enhancements or bugs closed during the last week! Who Count anuj.mittal@... 2 akuster808@... 1 richard.purdie@... 1 david.reyna@windriver.

All, Below is the list as of top 50 bug owners as of the end of WW04 of who have open medium or higher bugs and enhancements against YP 3.3. There are 67 possible work days left until the final releas

Current Dev Position: YP 3.3 M3 development Next Deadline: 1st March 2021 YP 3.3 M3 build Next Team Meetings: Bug Triage meeting Thursday Jan. 28th at 7:30am PDT (https://zoom.us/j/454367603?pwd=ZGxoa

All, The triage team is starting to try and collect up and classify bugs which a newcomer to the project would be able to work on in a way which means people can find them. They're being listed on the

Splits out the three variants of the rock-pi-4 (A, B & C) into their own machines. Unfortunately, it is not possible to have a single machine that works for all three, as there isn't any known ways fo

Ya, we can keep the old machine around for the old kernels

Hi, Just a reminder about our upcoming OpenEmbedded Happy Hour on January 27 for Europe/US timezones @ 1700/5pm UTC (12pm ET): https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Calendar https://www.timeanddate.com/wo

Is there any way to make this work with both new (4.10, -dev, -tiny, -rt) and old (5.4) kernels? What if we left the old rock-pi-4 MACHINE for the 5.4 kernel and required one of the new ones for 5.10?

D'oh! Thanks.

Ya, I saw that. We should probably remove the .patch file also.

Thanks, I've already pushed a patch for this one.

Hi Marek, That's good to hear! I suspect it's not much work to merge the fixes and maintain the branch, but I'll leave it up to Hongxu. ../Randy

Hi Randy, <randy.macleod@...> wrote: I have done some small changes and now have tensorflow from master working on top of dunfell. Would you be interested in sharing changes back and integra

Hello folks, i am trying to compile my image but we could see that i am missing neon fpu in my image. I can't use this feature because i have a raspberry pi zero w and i have armv6 on this raspberrypi

#raspberrypi #neon #yocto #armv6

Hi, If I intentionally typo in the defconfig file: USB_NET_HUAWEI_CDC_NCM_cat=y USB_NET_DRIVERS=y USB_USBNET=y The bitbake -f linux command doesn't recognize the change. It means to me that any change

Hi, My comments are in-line I would consider it "best practice" to somewhat try to stay up to date with recent yocto versions and plan for this from the beginning of your project. What I mean is to ha

Hey, I figured to squeeze in a test and it seems that this is solved in Dunfell, at least I can’t trigger it even when trying and the folder structure used in the work directory has changed -> No issu