Sent: 31 January 2021 22:23 To: Aaron Cohen <aaron@...> Cc: Diego Santa Cruz <Diego.SantaCruz@...>; Paul Barker <pbarker@...>; Yocto-mailing-list <yocto@....

Sent: 24 January 2021 14:30 To: Jonas Vautherin <jonas.vautherin@...> Cc: Paul Barker <pbarker@...>; Yocto-mailing-list <yocto@...> Subject: Re: [yocto] Writing a BSP

Hi there,

#python

From: Philip Tricca <flihp@...> These have changed upstream. Signed-off-by: Philip Tricca <flihp@...> Signed-off-by: Diego Santa Cruz <Diego.SantaCruz@...> --- meta-tpm/recipes-

From: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@...> Newer kernels, in addition to the traditional /dev/tpmX device nodes, are now also creating /dev/tpmrmX device nodes. This causes this script to get confused

This ports patches from the meta-measured layer that fix tpm2-abrmd not starting up. The first patch is necessary on kernels 4.12 and later. The second patch is necessary after the update to 2.3.0. Ph

Dear all, I got the feedback below by private email (was meant to be sent to the m-l), so I think I’ll go with meta-tmp2 from meta-secure-core for now. But I may switch to meta-tpm from meta-security

Hello, I need to use a TPM2 software stack for my project (tpm2-tools, tpm2-abrmd, tpm2-tss, etc.), where I am already using Yocto, meta-intel, meta-oe, meta-networking, etc. I see there are at least

I'm using linux-intel. BTW, the existing documentation about nocfg under https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/mega-manual/mega-manual.html#kernel-types is not very clear and from what I got from t

Hi, I have not received any feedback on the below email and I am not sure I am doing the right thing. Can anyone provide some advice as to what would be the recommended way to apply kernel patches lis

Hello there, I am trying to add a few BSP specific kernel patches for my BSP and I wanted to pull them from the BSP definition scc file. However, I cannot get those patches applied (I am using thud).

Hi there, We are starting the development of a product based on TI DM814x SoC and considering using Yocto to base our development on. Unfortunately, TI does has only included support for this SoC on a