|
Layer index update for meta-linux-mainline
I've made the changes, please check. there is still some old data, hopefully it will be fixed when the index is updated.
I've made the changes, please check. there is still some old data, hopefully it will be fixed when the index is updated.
|
By
...
· #58923
·
|
|
Git send-email blocked by gmail security changes (and how to fix it)
You did the right thing. This is also how I use gmail with git-send-email. I don't remember if they disabled it for all gmail users, or only for users who enable 2FA.. but using apps specific token is
You did the right thing. This is also how I use gmail with git-send-email. I don't remember if they disabled it for all gmail users, or only for users who enable 2FA.. but using apps specific token is
|
By
...
· #58129
·
|
|
[meta-security][PATCH resend] Parsec-service: add parsec user to teeclnt group when optee is present
Subscription is not required, but then you end up in the moderation queue. I can see your message in the moderation queue, I will delete the original message.
Subscription is not required, but then you end up in the moderation queue. I can see your message in the moderation queue, I will delete the original message.
|
By
...
· #57935
·
|
|
what's the situation with yocto support for qualcomm qcs{410,610} eval boards?
hey, the underlying chipset , e.g. the Qualcomm QCS410 (or 610) is not supported upstream. So a 'regular' OE + meta-qcom is not going to be straightforward. meta-qcom typically supports 'machines' and
hey, the underlying chipset , e.g. the Qualcomm QCS410 (or 610) is not supported upstream. So a 'regular' OE + meta-qcom is not going to be straightforward. meta-qcom typically supports 'machines' and
|
By
...
· #57140
·
|
|
is there already online the YP summit "hands-on setup"?
No , we are using a different cloud provider / partner this time. That requires all the 'students' to have a valid account with our partner (Digital Ocean), and all the hands on will be done using DO
No , we are using a different cloud provider / partner this time. That requires all the 'students' to have a valid account with our partner (Digital Ocean), and all the hands on will be done using DO
|
By
...
· #57110
·
|
|
a waitlist for YP summit 2022.05?
The problem is fixed now. You should be able to register again! Sorry about that.
The problem is fixed now. You should be able to register again! Sorry about that.
|
By
...
· #57106
·
|
|
a waitlist for YP summit 2022.05?
hey Robert, It is odd. And it was not expected. We are aware of the issue, and have reached out to LF Events team and asked for help.
hey Robert, It is odd. And it was not expected. We are aware of the issue, and have reached out to LF Events team and asked for help.
|
By
...
· #57105
·
|
|
[docs] [PATCH] migration-guides: stop including documents with ".. include"
heh.. I don't mind either way.. I could have sent a proper patch too, i quickly sent it to share with everyone.. yeah, i read about that too.. and found https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/837
heh.. I don't mind either way.. I could have sent a proper patch too, i quickly sent it to share with everyone.. yeah, i read about that too.. and found https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/837
|
By
...
· #56918
·
|
|
[docs] [yocto] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Yocto Project 4.0 is Released
yes, that seems correct. I don't think we should continue to use the include directive here. Since you try to make one section (for 3.4 and 4.0) with the migration and the release notes, I think somet
yes, that seems correct. I don't think we should continue to use the include directive here. Since you try to make one section (for 3.4 and 4.0) with the migration and the release notes, I think somet
|
By
...
· #56913
·
|
|
[docs] [yocto] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Yocto Project 4.0 is Released
oh... It's because the file release-notes-4.0.rst is included with a ..include statement. The variable mapping is done with a custom Sphinx extension (yocto-vars.py) which is triggered for the 'source
oh... It's because the file release-notes-4.0.rst is included with a ..include statement. The variable mapping is done with a custom Sphinx extension (yocto-vars.py) which is triggered for the 'source
|
By
...
· #56912
·
|
|
[docs] [yocto] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Yocto Project 4.0 is Released
I can reproduce the issue when building locally. I am using Sphinx==4.4.0
I can reproduce the issue when building locally. I am using Sphinx==4.4.0
|
By
...
· #56911
·
|
|
How to contribute to Yocto core ?
hey Talel, Thanks for reaching out! You are welcome to attend any of the public Yocto developers meetings, if nothing else you will meet and hear directly from the core developers. However it's not st
hey Talel, Thanks for reaching out! You are welcome to attend any of the public Yocto developers meetings, if nothing else you will meet and hear directly from the core developers. However it's not st
|
By
...
· #56680
·
|
|
[docs] [PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper] scripts/run-docs-build: stop using the "transition" branch
docs.pythong.org is where we stole the idea of the switcher ;-) Would anyone be able to figure out if their 'publishing' script is available anywhere? if we could mimic that somehow that might be good
docs.pythong.org is where we stole the idea of the switcher ;-) Would anyone be able to figure out if their 'publishing' script is available anywhere? if we could mimic that somehow that might be good
|
By
...
· #55525
·
|
|
[docs] [PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper] scripts/run-docs-build: stop using the "transition" branch
Yes, this part is indeed poorly implemented. But I don't think we can remove the transition branch until we fix it, so I don't think we can take this patch now. perhaps we should maintain the overall
Yes, this part is indeed poorly implemented. But I don't think we can remove the transition branch until we fix it, so I don't think we can take this patch now. perhaps we should maintain the overall
|
By
...
· #55471
·
|
|
[docs] [PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper] scripts/run-docs-build: stop using the "transition" branch
I don't understand. With this change, we no longer build the pages we reference here: https://docs.yoctoproject.org/releases.html#outdated-release-manuals Or am I missing here?
I don't understand. With this change, we no longer build the pages we reference here: https://docs.yoctoproject.org/releases.html#outdated-release-manuals Or am I missing here?
|
By
...
· #55470
·
|
|
[docs] [PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper] scripts/run-docs-build: remove gatesgarth
I agree with Quentin here. Until we have a better mechanism (to rebuild only modified branches not all of them each time, ..) I think we should continue to build them all.
I agree with Quentin here. Until we have a better mechanism (to rebuild only modified branches not all of them each time, ..) I think we should continue to build them all.
|
By
...
· #55417
·
|
|
How to submit/create a new repository in http://git.yoctoproject.org/
hey, Not really. We definitely believe that the Yocto Project Compatible program is a valuable tool for our ecosystem. However, layers on git.yp.org are not required to be compatible. But that's a goo
hey, Not really. We definitely believe that the Yocto Project Compatible program is a valuable tool for our ecosystem. However, layers on git.yp.org are not required to be compatible. But that's a goo
|
By
...
· #54997
·
|
|
CFP is now open for the next Yocto Project Summit 2021.11
Dear all, The next Yocto Project (virtual) Summit will take place on Nov 30 - Dec 2, 2021. While we are finalizing the registration tools, we've already opened the CFP, and we are, as always, looking
Dear all, The next Yocto Project (virtual) Summit will take place on Nov 30 - Dec 2, 2021. While we are finalizing the registration tools, we've already opened the CFP, and we are, as always, looking
|
By
...
· #54912
·
|
|
Move of official IRC channels to libera.chat
Dear all, As some of you may have read over the past days, there has been an ownership dispute over the freenode.net network. The IRC network has been used by the Yocto Project and many other projects
Dear all, As some of you may have read over the past days, there has been an ownership dispute over the freenode.net network. The IRC network has been used by the Yocto Project and many other projects
|
By
...
· #53737
·
|
|
hostile freenode takeover
I think the question of setting up Matrix for our community is a valid question, though I think it's orthogonal to the current problem. If freenode goes away , we need an alternate plan to move *right
I think the question of setting up Matrix for our community is a valid question, though I think it's orthogonal to the current problem. If freenode goes away , we need an alternate plan to move *right
|
By
...
· #53596
·
|