Dear all, As some of you may have read over the past days, there has been an ownership dispute over the freenode.net network. The IRC network has been used by the Yocto Project and many other projects

I think the question of setting up Matrix for our community is a valid question, though I think it's orthogonal to the current problem. If freenode goes away , we need an alternate plan to move *right

Thanks for your email. We are aware, and have started to look into that. It looks like some open source communities have started to move to https://www.oftc.net/ or https://libera.chat/.. If anyone wa

I think we should indeed improve that a bit. As far as I know, the only place for the release notes is the 'email' sent to yocto-announce, which includes the content from this file:http://downloads.yo

Well, in fact no , we shouldn't, is a short answer ;) Here is the long answer.. For bitbake and YP, we currently publish: master, master-next and 'stable' branches (e.g. 1.46, 1.48, 1.50 for bitbake d

hey! Thanks for starting this! sort -V is even better since it does "natural sort of (version) numbers within text", let's get ready for 3.10 ;) And using -V, how about something along these lines: v_

Thanks for the patch. Reviewed-by: Nicolas Dechesne <nicolas.dechesne@...>

I think this is a really good discussion, but I wonder why you want to go back in time.. I expect users of dunfell branch (which is an LTS from YP perspectives) would be rather unhappy to see such a m

yes, I thought about that too.. I wanted to get a quick fix first to publish 3.1.6 and 3.2.2 which were missing.. on the other hand, we have a larger issue with this. The 'release' information is need

Fixes: #14308 Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dechesne <nicolas.dechesne@...> --- scripts/run-docs-build | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/scripts/run-docs-build b/script

Use for loop to avoid repeating the same pattern over and over. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dechesne <nicolas.dechesne@...> --- scripts/run-docs-build | 72 ++++++++++++++++--------------------------

It's not related to yp-docs at least. most likely some recipes that use docbook for their docs/man pages, no?

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 8:07 AM jchludzinski via lists.yoctoproject.org <jchludzinski=vivaldi.net@...> wrote: Short answer is yes. The whole Yocto Project / Open Embedded concept is

hey Zoran, Please be aware that this is a community mailing list for the Yocto Project, and we expect everyone to be as pleasant as possible. I don't think the tone of your last email is appropriate f

Good idea. I've done it now!

hi there, The Yocto Project is looking to hire a technical writer to develop and maintain the many documents the project supplies the greater community, including the official Yocto Project documentat

Dear all, We are very excited to be part of the Outreachy program again for the December round this year, let me congratulate Ida and Dorinda for being accepted as interns for the next three months. I

<charles.davies@...> wrote: This is correct. When at least one (binary) package is needed from a recipe, then the recipe is built, and all the resulting packages are built. So when you inclu

hi Vasyl, Ah, you're right. It was possible with the previous docs, but not anymore. With the Sphinx based docs the whole Yocto Project docs is just "one set", not a collection of 'manuals'. So curren

hey Vasyl, Can you please describe what you are doing in the webpage? It should still work. You need to select "All in one Mega manual" in the dropdown menu on the top left corner of the page. When yo