OFTC is very good, IMO. It's been reliable, well managed, provides a good selection of services, provides a web client for anyone not particularly familiar with IRC clients, and supports SSL + CertFP

Hi Purushottam, [Re: [yocto] [meta-selinux][PATCH] openssh: don't overwrite sshd_config unconditionally] On 21.03.12 (Fri 12:05) Purushottam choudhary wrote: Sorry about that, I haven't merged it for

[Re: [yocto] [meta-selinux][dunfell][gatesgarth][master][PATCH] libselinux-python: Fix build error due to missing target config] On 21.03.09 (Tue 14:53) Anatol Belski wrote: No problem! I assumed you

Hi Anatol, I will confirm this against the other branches (dunfell and gatesgarth) but your patch doesn't appear to be against the current master branch (and it's unlikely one patch will apply to all

[Re: [yocto] [meta-selinux][PATCH] layer.conf: add gatesgarth compatibility] On 20.10.27 (Tue 16:00) nefethael wrote: Yeah, I've had that older patch in my work-tree for a while now and haven't pushed

[Re: [yocto] [meta-selinux][PATCH 0/4] refpolicy: update to 20200229+git] On 20.07.17 (Fri 12:05) Scott Murray wrote: I tend to agree. My goal with the policy has always been to have a clean boot in a

Thanks for these, Jeremy, I'd just been prepping the same patches today, but since yours are on-list, I'm merging them. -J. [[yocto] [meta-selinux][PATCH 1/2] python: move appends to a dynamic-layer]

[Re: [meta-selinux][PATCH] audit: fix host contamination for swig] On 19.12.31 (Tue 14:20) Yi Zhao wrote: Heh, telling that 16.04 is a modern Ubuntu in this context. :-) Anyway, yeah, I don't even hav

Hi Yi, So, just to confirm, this is needed in your experience (I don't have any builders that are that old, so I haven't verified). I just ask because we only just dropped this patch to begin with: co

Hi Yi, I've merged the others in this series, can you elaborate a bit on how this ensures we don't have a problem coming back that 5fd3c5b71 was intended to address? Thanks, -J. [[meta-selinux][PATCH

Hi Yi, I've merged the rest of this series, but this one fails to apply. It looks like your tree didn't contain: commit 5fd3c5b71edb99659aeb5cb5903088d84517382e (relabel, master) Author: Christophe PR

Did Mark sign off on this as well? [[meta-selinux][PATCH] MAINTAINERS: update maintainer] On 19.12.18 (Wed 16:14) Yi Zhao wrote:

[Re: [yocto] [meta-selinux] Dependency loop help with selinux userspace/python3/util-linux] On 19.12.11 (Wed 09:21) Peter Morrow via Lists.Yoctoproject.Org wrote: No, no issue as far as I can tell, I'

Hi Vincent, [[yocto] [meta-selinux] Warrior branch glib/meson problem] On 19.10.17 (Thu 12:50) Vincent Prince wrote: Sorry, I've been away from meta-selinux the last couple of weeks, I'm addressing th

[Re: [meta-selinux][PATCH] conf/layer.conf: use BBFILES_DYNAMIC for dynamic layers] On 19.09.11 (Wed 09:22) Yi Zhao wrote: Okay, thanks. Funny that I randomly picked the package that was broken in mul

Hi Yi, [[meta-selinux][PATCH] conf/layer.conf: use BBFILES_DYNAMIC for dynamic layers] On 19.09.09 (Mon 14:01) Yi Zhao wrote: This seems like a big claim, I certainly haven't seen that on my setup: *

[Re: [meta-selinux][PATCH] selinux-autorelabel: disable enforcing mode before relabel] On 19.09.06 (Fri 11:31) Yi Zhao wrote: Okay, but our version of the script is much less complex than the Fedora o

[[meta-selinux][PATCH] selinux-autorelabel: disable enforcing mode before relabel] On 19.09.05 (Thu 16:57) Yi Zhao wrote: Did you try this with '/usr/sbin/setenforce 0' instead? The rationale makes se

[Re: [yocto] [meta-selinux][PATCH 3/3] util-linux: drop obsolete patch] On 19.08.29 (Thu 16:00) Yi Zhao wrote: Oh, yeah, sure. It got classified as spam. Since it was the end of a queue I just assumed

[Re: [yocto] [meta-selinux] [PATCH] python-scapy: upgrade 2.4.2 -> 2.4.3] On 19.08.29 (Thu 07:14) akuster808 wrote: There's no scapy in meta-selinux, AFAIK. So proably this was destined for meta-secur