|
[Yocto-Advocacy] Yocto Project Community Manager updates
Let me chime in. Nico, thank you so much for your leadership as the Yocto community manager and beyond. You certainly made sure that the community remained welcoming and supportive to new and current
Let me chime in. Nico, thank you so much for your leadership as the Yocto community manager and beyond. You certainly made sure that the community remained welcoming and supportive to new and current
|
By
Rudolf J Streif
· #59875
·
|
|
Network Isolation and CMake FetchContent
On 3/22/23 10:56, Jose Quaresma wrote: Thank you. That did the trick. I should have known that. It's one of these days...
On 3/22/23 10:56, Jose Quaresma wrote: Thank you. That did the trick. I should have known that. It's one of these days...
|
By
Rudolf J Streif
· #59494
·
|
|
Network Isolation and CMake FetchContent
I have a vendor project which uses CMake FetchContent. It's simple to override FETCHCONTENT_FULLY_DISCONNECTED=ON which is set in the cmake class. However, that does not fix the issue since network is
I have a vendor project which uses CMake FetchContent. It's simple to override FETCHCONTENT_FULLY_DISCONNECTED=ON which is set in the cmake class. However, that does not fix the issue since network is
|
By
Rudolf J Streif
· #59492
·
|
|
Setting recipe PACKAGECONFIG with in a Bash script?
Hello, PACKAGECONFIG is to enable/disable features for a particular software package on a per-recipe basis. Hence, by its nature, PACKAGECONFIG is a recipe local variable. If you want to set it in a g
Hello, PACKAGECONFIG is to enable/disable features for a particular software package on a per-recipe basis. Hence, by its nature, PACKAGECONFIG is a recipe local variable. If you want to set it in a g
|
By
Rudolf J Streif
· #59123
·
|
|
LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_ variable in the layer's recipe
Oh no, now the entire Yocto Project world knows about this hack. Now we need a sanity checker for this in the insane class. :)
Oh no, now the entire Yocto Project world knows about this hack. Now we need a sanity checker for this in the insane class. :)
|
By
Rudolf J Streif
· #58708
·
|
|
LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_ variable in the layer's recipe
To me this indicates that the maintainer of the layer has tested the compatibility of his layer with all of these releases of the Yocto Project. A maintainer of a layer should make a deliberate decisi
To me this indicates that the maintainer of the layer has tested the compatibility of his layer with all of these releases of the Yocto Project. A maintainer of a layer should make a deliberate decisi
|
By
Rudolf J Streif
· #58690
·
|
|
patching of device tree from layer
Ron, Welcome. When asking a question on a mailing list it is always advisable to put all relevant information pertaining to the question into the email and be specific about what you think the problem
Ron, Welcome. When asking a question on a mailing list it is always advisable to put all relevant information pertaining to the question into the email and be specific about what you think the problem
|
By
Rudolf J Streif
· #58427
·
|
|
do_kernel_configme - Could not generate configuration queue
I can confirm that updating kern-tools-native to 6a4752eb resolved the issue for me.
I can confirm that updating kern-tools-native to 6a4752eb resolved the issue for me.
|
By
Rudolf J Streif
· #58362
·
|
|
do_kernel_configme - Could not generate configuration queue
Thank you, Jose and Bruce. Much appreciated. Rudi
Thank you, Jose and Bruce. Much appreciated. Rudi
|
By
Rudolf J Streif
· #58340
·
|
|
do_kernel_configme - Could not generate configuration queue
I am running into a bizarre problem with kernel configuration. I have an existing build environment that builds for an i.MX6ul machine. That works fine and the linux-fslc kernel 5.18 builds without an
I am running into a bizarre problem with kernel configuration. I have an existing build environment that builds for an i.MX6ul machine. That works fine and the linux-fslc kernel 5.18 builds without an
|
By
Rudolf J Streif
· #58337
·
|
|
Dependency for binary package
Yes, I have. These are the libs: 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libQt5Quick.so.5] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libQt5Gui.so.5] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library:
Yes, I have. These are the libs: 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libQt5Quick.so.5] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libQt5Gui.so.5] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library:
|
By
Rudolf J Streif
· #57912
·
|
|
Dependency for binary package
Yes, but that does not satisfy the dependency: ERROR: virtuoso-0.1-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: /opt/virtuoso/virtuoso contained in package virtuoso requires libGLESv2.so()(64bit), but no providers fou
Yes, but that does not satisfy the dependency: ERROR: virtuoso-0.1-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: /opt/virtuoso/virtuoso contained in package virtuoso requires libGLESv2.so()(64bit), but no providers fou
|
By
Rudolf J Streif
· #57905
·
|
|
Dependency for binary package
Thanks, Khem. libGLESv2 in question on the target was built with YP: 0x000000000000000e (SONAME) Library soname: [libGLESv2.so.2] The SDK that builds the application was built with the same YP setup.
Thanks, Khem. libGLESv2 in question on the target was built with YP: 0x000000000000000e (SONAME) Library soname: [libGLESv2.so.2] The SDK that builds the application was built with the same YP setup.
|
By
Rudolf J Streif
· #57903
·
|
|
Dependency for binary package
Thank you, Quentin. Yes, that is exactly the issue: 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libQt5Quick.so.5] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libQt5Gui.so.5] 0x0000000000000001 (NEED
Thank you, Quentin. Yes, that is exactly the issue: 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libQt5Quick.so.5] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libQt5Gui.so.5] 0x0000000000000001 (NEED
|
By
Rudolf J Streif
· #57901
·
|
|
Dependency for binary package
I am packaging a binary package that has been built with the SDK created with the exact same configuration. During do_package I am getting an error that a dependency on libGLESv2.so()(64bit) cannot be
I am packaging a binary package that has been built with the SDK created with the exact same configuration. During do_package I am getting an error that a dependency on libGLESv2.so()(64bit) cannot be
|
By
Rudolf J Streif
· #57898
·
|
|
Force binary package install
It was definitely an architecture mismatch. I checked the architecture of the files with objdump. That is what threw me off in the first place. I simply checked the versions. They were off but I could
It was definitely an architecture mismatch. I checked the architecture of the files with objdump. That is what threw me off in the first place. I simply checked the versions. They were off but I could
|
By
Rudolf J Streif
· #57329
·
|
|
Force binary package install
Thanks, Richard. I was sidetracked by other stuff, hence the delay. Please see below. That's the objdump on libc.so.6 on the target (aarch64, Honister): Version definitions: 1 0x01 0x0865f4e6 libc.so.
Thanks, Richard. I was sidetracked by other stuff, hence the delay. Please see below. That's the objdump on libc.so.6 on the target (aarch64, Honister): Version definitions: 1 0x01 0x0865f4e6 libc.so.
|
By
Rudolf J Streif
· #57326
·
|
|
Force binary package install
It's Yocto that creates the spec file for rpm. Apparently, besides relying on what is declared in RDEPENDS, it actually iterates over the files and appends the dependencies (and their versions). It re
It's Yocto that creates the spec file for rpm. Apparently, besides relying on what is declared in RDEPENDS, it actually iterates over the files and appends the dependencies (and their versions). It re
|
By
Rudolf J Streif
· #57302
·
|
|
Force binary package install
Yes, thank you. ERROR: xxx-single-group-0.1-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: /opt/binstuf/linux-allwinneryocto-armle-opengles_2.0-obj/lib/libfbxsdk.so contained in package xxx-single-group requires libpthr
Yes, thank you. ERROR: xxx-single-group-0.1-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: /opt/binstuf/linux-allwinneryocto-armle-opengles_2.0-obj/lib/libfbxsdk.so contained in package xxx-single-group requires libpthr
|
By
Rudolf J Streif
· #57300
·
|
|
Force binary package install
Not exactly as is because of customer names, but below is a sanitized version: SUMMARY = "Binary Stuff" LICENSE = "CLOSED" SRC_URI = "file://binary_installer.tgz \ " do_install() { install -d -m 0755
Not exactly as is because of customer names, but below is a sanitized version: SUMMARY = "Binary Stuff" LICENSE = "CLOSED" SRC_URI = "file://binary_installer.tgz \ " do_install() { install -d -m 0755
|
By
Rudolf J Streif
· #57298
·
|