|
is there a recent explanation of tricks you can play with MACHINEOVERRIDES?
i did write that a while back while i was still figuring it out. :-) i agree that it would be inappropriate in the *regular* sections of the docs, but i'm convinced it would be worth explaining in som
i did write that a while back while i was still figuring it out. :-) i agree that it would be inappropriate in the *regular* sections of the docs, but i'm convinced it would be worth explaining in som
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
· #52781
·
|
|
does current bitbaking of core-image-minimal still need docbook stuff?
it appears (after a *very* cursory investigation) that shared-mime-info-native is included, which drags in xmlto-native, which then drags in docbook stuff. i'll confirm that later. rday
it appears (after a *very* cursory investigation) that shared-mime-info-native is included, which drags in xmlto-native, which then drags in docbook stuff. i'll confirm that later. rday
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
· #52777
·
|
|
does current bitbaking of core-image-minimal still need docbook stuff?
most likely, but as i'm explicitly not installing any documentation, i'm now poking around to see what insists on building that for no apparent reason. rday
most likely, but as i'm explicitly not installing any documentation, i'm now poking around to see what insists on building that for no apparent reason. rday
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
· #52775
·
|
|
is there a recent explanation of tricks you can play with MACHINEOVERRIDES?
years ago, i asked about how to support a small set of closely-related targets using MACHINEOVERRIDES to define how to apply patches in a (somewhat) hierarchical fashion: https://www.yoctoproject.org/
years ago, i asked about how to support a small set of closely-related targets using MACHINEOVERRIDES to define how to apply patches in a (somewhat) hierarchical fashion: https://www.yoctoproject.org/
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
· #52773
·
|
|
does current bitbaking of core-image-minimal still need docbook stuff?
testing building qemuarm64 core-image-minimal from scratch, and noticed it fetching for docbook-xml and docbook-xsl stuff ... is there something that still needs docbook support? i'm about to take a q
testing building qemuarm64 core-image-minimal from scratch, and noticed it fetching for docbook-xml and docbook-xsl stuff ... is there something that still needs docbook support? i'm about to take a q
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
· #52772
·
|
|
Recipes and meta-data directory tree
... snip ... you can't legitimately expect support for YP 2.0, which is six years old and has been EOLed for quite some time. rday
... snip ... you can't legitimately expect support for YP 2.0, which is six years old and has been EOLed for quite some time. rday
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
· #52749
·
|
|
Building test code?
in current OE, there is no "GPL-2.0" license file, there is "GPL-2.0-only" and "GPL-2.0-or-later" and a bunch of others, so i think you need to pick one of those. rday
in current OE, there is no "GPL-2.0" license file, there is "GPL-2.0-only" and "GPL-2.0-or-later" and a bunch of others, so i think you need to pick one of those. rday
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
· #52741
·
|
|
how often would one use "VAR_someoverride_append = ..."?
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021, Quentin Schulz wrote: ... snip ... > https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_5.10.bb#n12 > for example. > > This is an example o
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021, Quentin Schulz wrote: ... snip ... > https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_5.10.bb#n12 > for example. > > This is an example o
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
· #52660
·
|
|
how often would one use "VAR_someoverride_append = ..."?
can you point at an actual example of that? i took a look and all the yocto kernel recipes i see use the first form. am i just looking in the wrong place? rday
can you point at an actual example of that? i took a look and all the yocto kernel recipes i see use the first form. am i just looking in the wrong place? rday
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
· #52646
·
|
|
konrad has officially blessed his new meta-rubygems layer
inspired by my earlier plaintive mewling of "gosh, i wish YP had better ruby support," konrad weihmann put in a ridiculous amount of work and came up with: https://github.com/priv-kweihmann/meta-rubyg
inspired by my earlier plaintive mewling of "gosh, i wish YP had better ruby support," konrad weihmann put in a ridiculous amount of work and came up with: https://github.com/priv-kweihmann/meta-rubyg
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
· #52644
·
|
|
what version of YP will next wind river (LTS20) be based on?
i suspect i know the answer, just want to confirm ... friend tells me yesterday he's working with LTS20, i said, "uh, that's not even out yet," he assures he his company has an early release, but he c
i suspect i know the answer, just want to confirm ... friend tells me yesterday he's working with LTS20, i said, "uh, that's not even out yet," he assures he his company has an early release, but he c
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
· #52641
·
|
|
how often would one use "VAR_someoverride_append = ..."?
i remember testing this a few years back, and making sure i appreciated the subtleties. i might take a shot at rewriting that section, since i think it has potential for confusion. mostly, warning the
i remember testing this a few years back, and making sure i appreciated the subtleties. i might take a shot at rewriting that section, since i think it has potential for confusion. mostly, warning the
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
· #52625
·
|
|
how often would one use "VAR_someoverride_append = ..."?
bitbake manual, chapter 3, examples of conditional syntax: https://docs.yoctoproject.org/bitbake/bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manual-metadata.html#examples correctly distinguishes between A_foo_ap
bitbake manual, chapter 3, examples of conditional syntax: https://docs.yoctoproject.org/bitbake/bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manual-metadata.html#examples correctly distinguishes between A_foo_ap
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
· #52623
·
|
|
anyone bundled libbpf into a recipe?
colleague wants a recipe for libbpf: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf would anyone have done that already and is willing to let me steal it? rday
colleague wants a recipe for libbpf: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf would anyone have done that already and is willing to let me steal it? rday
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
· #52417
·
|
|
how to copy NTP parser files verbatim from 4.2.8p10 to 4.2.8p13?
here's hoping someone has gone through this and can summarize what i need to do; i'll try to keep it short. migrating all sorts of stuff from (effectively) morty project to (effectively) zeus, and cur
here's hoping someone has gone through this and can summarize what i need to do; i'll try to keep it short. migrating all sorts of stuff from (effectively) morty project to (effectively) zeus, and cur
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
· #52293
·
|
|
using SYSTEMD_SERVICE to disable a systemd service?
while the "standard" way to disable a systemd service from auto-booting is SYSTEMD_AUTO_ENABLE, i just ran across a number of examples in an existing project that do this: SYSTEMD_SERVICE_${PN} = "" o
while the "standard" way to disable a systemd service from auto-booting is SYSTEMD_AUTO_ENABLE, i just ran across a number of examples in an existing project that do this: SYSTEMD_SERVICE_${PN} = "" o
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
· #52183
·
|
|
oddity: file_5.37 printing unexpected "octet-stream" mime type for ISO
(i asked about this on the OE list a couple days ago, but i have more info and wanted to get a bit wider coverage as i really, really want to de-mystify this issue.) on current project, upgrading from
(i asked about this on the OE list a couple days ago, but i have more info and wanted to get a bit wider coverage as i really, really want to de-mystify this issue.) on current project, upgrading from
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
· #52166
·
|
|
any interest in an official "meta-rubygems" layer?
interesting idea, i hadn't considered that. in the meantime, i think we'll ponder what the structure of the new layer will look like, and put together a first pass. rday
interesting idea, i hadn't considered that. in the meantime, i think we'll ponder what the structure of the new layer will look like, and put together a first pass. rday
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
· #52132
·
|
|
any interest in an official "meta-rubygems" layer?
i personally am not, so i suspect github is the option. rday
i personally am not, so i suspect github is the option. rday
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
· #52125
·
|
|
any interest in an official "meta-rubygems" layer?
regarding the proposed "meta-rubygems" layer --- which sounds like it's going to take off as it can be initialized quite a lot just from konrad's existing meta-sca layer, what are the options for "off
regarding the proposed "meta-rubygems" layer --- which sounds like it's going to take off as it can be initialized quite a lot just from konrad's existing meta-sca layer, what are the options for "off
|
By
Robert P. J. Day
· #52123
·
|