Date   
should all "IMAGE_INSTALL +=" become "IMAGE_INSTALL_append"? By Robert P. J. Day · #48403 ·
should all "IMAGE_INSTALL +=" become "IMAGE_INSTALL_append"? By Robert P. J. Day · #48401 ·
should all "IMAGE_INSTALL +=" become "IMAGE_INSTALL_append"? By Robert P. J. Day · #48398 ·
[PATCH] dev-manual: layer priority takes precedence over PV By Robert P. J. Day · #48397 ·
dev-manual: differing versions of same recipe in different priority layers? By Robert P. J. Day · #48394 ·
dev-manual: differing versions of same recipe in different priority layers? By Robert P. J. Day · #48391 ·
[PATCH] dev-manual: chs 1,2; rewording, cleanup By Robert P. J. Day · #48390 ·
[PATCH] overview-manual: minor editing, rendering, wording changes By Robert P. J. Day · #48388 ·
reviving an old suggestion about YP docs markup By Robert P. J. Day · #48375 ·
[PATCH] overview-manual: chs 1-3, various minor tweaks/cleanups By Robert P. J. Day · #48361 ·
why is poky described as not something you can use "out of the box"? By Robert P. J. Day · #48355 ·
reviving an old suggestion about YP docs markup By Robert P. J. Day · #48353 ·
reviving an old suggestion about YP docs markup By Robert P. J. Day · #48351 ·
clarifying "PROVIDES =" versus "PROVIDES +=" (pedantic stuff) By Robert P. J. Day · #48350 ·
reviving an old suggestion about YP docs markup By Robert P. J. Day · #48347 ·
[PATCH] ref-manual: update PROVIDES entry, "+=" -> "=" By Robert P. J. Day · #48343 ·
clarifying "PROVIDES =" versus "PROVIDES +=" (pedantic stuff) By Robert P. J. Day · #48342 ·
more nitpicky pedantry: question about DEFAULT_PREFERENCE By Robert P. J. Day · #48337 ·
more nitpicky pedantry: question about DEFAULT_PREFERENCE By Robert P. J. Day · #48332 ·
wanting to clarify combination of overrides and appends By Robert P. J. Day · #48316 ·