|
nothing building under denzil-7.0.1
I can confirm I had no issues doing just what you did. tarball for denzil-7.0.1 and denzil clone for meta-intel and default core-image-sato for n450. Next, I cloned poky and checked out the tag denzil
I can confirm I had no issues doing just what you did. tarball for denzil-7.0.1 and denzil clone for meta-intel and default core-image-sato for n450. Next, I cloned poky and checked out the tag denzil
|
By
Jim Abernathy
· #8080
·
|
|
nothing building under denzil-7.0.1
Okay, I blew away my poky and build directories, but keep my download central directory. Here are the steps. git clone git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky cd poky git clone git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta
Okay, I blew away my poky and build directories, but keep my download central directory. Here are the steps. git clone git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky cd poky git clone git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta
|
By
Jim Abernathy
· #8076
·
|
|
nothing building under denzil-7.0.1
I don't have something right yet. on poky, I'm up to date on denzil branch. Also denzil branch on meta-intel. I'm getting a build failure on the yocto kernel. Log file below: DEBUG: Trying Upstream DE
I don't have something right yet. on poky, I'm up to date on denzil branch. Also denzil branch on meta-intel. I'm getting a build failure on the yocto kernel. Log file below: DEBUG: Trying Upstream DE
|
By
Jim Abernathy
· #8072
·
|
|
nothing building under denzil-7.0.1
I should know shortly. I patched the n450 like I did before. I forgot that BSP didn't get updated when denzil 7.0.1 came out. Duh! If you have it fixed in Denzil and master branch, I'll test that as w
I should know shortly. I patched the n450 like I did before. I forgot that BSP didn't get updated when denzil 7.0.1 came out. Duh! If you have it fixed in Denzil and master branch, I'll test that as w
|
By
Jim Abernathy
· #8067
·
|
|
nothing building under denzil-7.0.1
I think it maybe that old problem with the n450 SRCREC being blank in the linux-yocto bbappend file. Obviously that BSP didn't get fixed before 7.0.1 was deployed. I'll put in the ones I used to patch
I think it maybe that old problem with the n450 SRCREC being blank in the linux-yocto bbappend file. Obviously that BSP didn't get fixed before 7.0.1 was deployed. I'll put in the ones I used to patch
|
By
Jim Abernathy
· #8065
·
|
|
nothing building under denzil-7.0.1
There must be some basic thing I'm missing. Nothing that I used to build under denzil 7.0 will now build under denzil 7.0.1 or tracking the denzil branch. Are all the BSPs required to be updated to 7.
There must be some basic thing I'm missing. Nothing that I used to build under denzil 7.0 will now build under denzil 7.0.1 or tracking the denzil branch. Are all the BSPs required to be updated to 7.
|
By
Jim Abernathy
· #8063
·
|
|
build failures after recent pull
This does not happen on Denzil 7.0.1 tarball. Jim A
This does not happen on Denzil 7.0.1 tarball. Jim A
|
By
Jim Abernathy
· #8040
·
|
|
build failures after recent pull
I failed to mention this is on the denzil branch of both poky and meta-intel. JIm A
I failed to mention this is on the denzil branch of both poky and meta-intel. JIm A
|
By
Jim Abernathy
· #8039
·
|
|
build failures after recent pull
Something that got pushed recently has broken the tools. To keep the debug simple, I went back and tried to just build an old stable platform, the n450. Below is the error: NOTE: Unpacking home/jim/yo
Something that got pushed recently has broken the tools. To keep the debug simple, I went back and tried to just build an old stable platform, the n450. Below is the error: NOTE: Unpacking home/jim/yo
|
By
Jim Abernathy
· #8038
·
|
|
meta-baryon flexibility
So if I understand this, it would be better for one of the image.bb files that focused on media to include this particular RRECOMMENDS statement. That way others not interested in media and graphic co
So if I understand this, it would be better for one of the image.bb files that focused on media to include this particular RRECOMMENDS statement. That way others not interested in media and graphic co
|
By
Jim Abernathy
· #7978
·
|
|
meta-baryon flexibility
In an effort to explore how independent a layer could be to the underlying hardware, I took the meta-baryon NAS layer and got it built from master using the n450 BSP. With that working I decided to re
In an effort to explore how independent a layer could be to the underlying hardware, I took the meta-baryon NAS layer and got it built from master using the n450 BSP. With that working I decided to re
|
By
Jim Abernathy
· #7957
·
|
|
Is it just me? Can't get 'Atom-PC' to boot.
When I build for Atom PCs, I'm usually targeting a specific BSP like CrownBay, n450, Cedartrail. All of those require the meta-intel layer. So you need to edit the local.conf with a machine like n450,
When I build for Atom PCs, I'm usually targeting a specific BSP like CrownBay, n450, Cedartrail. All of those require the meta-intel layer. So you need to edit the local.conf with a machine like n450,
|
By
Jim Abernathy
· #7929
·
|
|
meta-baryon
Never mind. Because baryon is on master and poky is on edison, there are some issues like: 1. the baryon-image.bb uses CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL instead of what edison needed,which was POKY_EXTRA_INSTA
Never mind. Because baryon is on master and poky is on edison, there are some issues like: 1. the baryon-image.bb uses CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL instead of what edison needed,which was POKY_EXTRA_INSTA
|
By
Jim Abernathy
· #7833
·
|
|
meta-baryon
When you do have time, let me know if my assumptions above were correct. I must be missing something because I can't find any evidence of webmin in the file system. So while my board boots Yocto, I ca
When you do have time, let me know if my assumptions above were correct. I must be missing something because I can't find any evidence of webmin in the file system. So while my board boots Yocto, I ca
|
By
Jim Abernathy
· #7832
·
|
|
meta-baryon
This is an issues with Denzil. I went back and built it on edison branch and it built clean and boots on a D510MO board. Jim A
This is an issues with Denzil. I went back and built it on edison branch and it built clean and boots on a D510MO board. Jim A
|
By
Jim Abernathy
· #7830
·
|
|
switch between denzil and edison
I just build an Ubuntu 12.04 LTS development system and installed the required packages based on the current 1.2 QS Guide. On Denzil based BSP that works as expected. However, I needed to switch back
I just build an Ubuntu 12.04 LTS development system and installed the required packages based on the current 1.2 QS Guide. On Denzil based BSP that works as expected. However, I needed to switch back
|
By
Jim Abernathy
· #7827
·
|
|
meta-baryon
I took at look at the meta baryon NAS project and thought it was interesting and decided to build it on a n410 based miniITX motherboard. I think I guessed correctly on how to integrate it in. 1. make
I took at look at the meta baryon NAS project and thought it was interesting and decided to build it on a n410 based miniITX motherboard. I think I guessed correctly on how to integrate it in. 1. make
|
By
Jim Abernathy
· #7808
·
|
|
menuconfig vs. config fragments?
Adding the .cfg extension does indeed fix my problem. Thanks for the help. Jim A
Adding the .cfg extension does indeed fix my problem. Thanks for the help. Jim A
|
By
Jim Abernathy
· #7768
·
|
|
Documentation improvement
Scott, I found out over the weekend that the config fragment file needs to have the .cfg extension. This would agree with the example in the Developer Manual, but make the BSP Guide in error, as it us
Scott, I found out over the weekend that the config fragment file needs to have the .cfg extension. This would agree with the example in the Developer Manual, but make the BSP Guide in error, as it us
|
By
Jim Abernathy
· #7767
·
|
|
menuconfig vs. config fragments?
I'm testing it now, but it sound like the problem. So the Developer Manual uses the .cfg in the example, but the BSP Guide does not. That's an area to fix. Since this is critical,it needs to be pointe
I'm testing it now, but it sound like the problem. So the Developer Manual uses the .cfg in the example, but the BSP Guide does not. That's an area to fix. Since this is critical,it needs to be pointe
|
By
Jim Abernathy
· #7765
·
|