|
how to separate packages in downloads folder into those that run on target and those that do not run on target?
Dear Gangadhar, In message <CAKxnL=hSs5NNCQY9ZTZi0XWXGJOOn0i_0f-X7k7JksCZZrGo9w@...> you wrote: Do you think such a separation is possible at all? Depending on your target configuration, pa
Dear Gangadhar, In message <CAKxnL=hSs5NNCQY9ZTZi0XWXGJOOn0i_0f-X7k7JksCZZrGo9w@...> you wrote: Do you think such a separation is possible at all? Depending on your target configuration, pa
|
By
...
· #22332
·
|
|
Referencing sysroot libraries during build?
Hello, I have a build problem which is caused by libraries not being found. It's a recipe to build the U-Boot bot loader which includes running the "mkimage" tool generated during this build. This fai
Hello, I have a build problem which is caused by libraries not being found. It's a recipe to build the U-Boot bot loader which includes running the "mkimage" tool generated during this build. This fai
|
By
...
· #22213
·
|
|
[PATCH] Perl: fix PERL5LIB settings
The PERL5LIB settings in the perl wrapper script did not include the "site_perl" or "vendor_perl" directories, which caused some errors. See https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6890 Sign
The PERL5LIB settings in the perl wrapper script did not include the "site_perl" or "vendor_perl" directories, which caused some errors. See https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6890 Sign
|
By
...
· #22075
·
|
|
PERL5LIB not properly reflecting target_sdk_dir
Dear Joseph Andrew de la Peña, In message <CAJrRHk4Q_bnrv2g1Kup9BTJj9gVMufKmSLtmBx8K5hmp7mE+PQ@...> you wrote: I confirm the problem. To be more precise, PERL5LIB is not set in the environm
Dear Joseph Andrew de la Peña, In message <CAJrRHk4Q_bnrv2g1Kup9BTJj9gVMufKmSLtmBx8K5hmp7mE+PQ@...> you wrote: I confirm the problem. To be more precise, PERL5LIB is not set in the environm
|
By
...
· #21939
·
|
|
kernel-yocto.bbclass ignoring SRCREV?
Hi, is my understanding of kernel-yocto.bbclass correct that it effectively completely ignores any specific git commit ID that was gien in SRCREV, but instead always checks out and uses the HEAD of th
Hi, is my understanding of kernel-yocto.bbclass correct that it effectively completely ignores any specific git commit ID that was gien in SRCREV, but instead always checks out and uses the HEAD of th
|
By
...
· #19731
·
|
|
Known toolchain bug?
Dear Gary Thomas, In message <52FE2B80.9030907@...> you wrote: Sorry. Here it is... Best regards, Wolfgang Denk
Dear Gary Thomas, In message <52FE2B80.9030907@...> you wrote: Sorry. Here it is... Best regards, Wolfgang Denk
|
By
...
· #18135
·
|
|
Known toolchain bug?
Hello, in message [1] on the Linaro mailing list, Koen Kooi reported a toolchain problem. I can reproduce the same problem both in Yocto 1.5.1 and witht he current top-of-tree; for example, using the
Hello, in message [1] on the Linaro mailing list, Koen Kooi reported a toolchain problem. I can reproduce the same problem both in Yocto 1.5.1 and witht he current top-of-tree; for example, using the
|
By
...
· #18116
·
|
|
uimage instead of zImage
Dear Edward, In message <CANwz6nzQq8a1RnqL3Ety2tJ-CkTOnOObQtiEVXu6+TOhve5LAA@...> you wrote: No header gets modified. Instead, a new header gets prepended. Actually it's pretty stupid to us
Dear Edward, In message <CANwz6nzQq8a1RnqL3Ety2tJ-CkTOnOObQtiEVXu6+TOhve5LAA@...> you wrote: No header gets modified. Instead, a new header gets prepended. Actually it's pretty stupid to us
|
By
...
· #16719
·
|
|
Embedded Linux with Xenomai support
Dear Asier, In message <CAMZj-5MD+kLf3JVS7Mmyq-JfREKPdcoam0NFCTrqsFw4bnrx4A@...> you wrote: ELDK adds full Xenomai support starting with release v5.4 ; please see www.denx.de/wiki/view/ELDK
Dear Asier, In message <CAMZj-5MD+kLf3JVS7Mmyq-JfREKPdcoam0NFCTrqsFw4bnrx4A@...> you wrote: ELDK adds full Xenomai support starting with release v5.4 ; please see www.denx.de/wiki/view/ELDK
|
By
...
· #15781
·
|
|
Unhandled dependency checking
Hello, I'm looking ofr a good way to deal with some build breakages caused by missing dependency checking. The problem: some packages require certain capabilities, without checking for these, and actu
Hello, I'm looking ofr a good way to deal with some build breakages caused by missing dependency checking. The problem: some packages require certain capabilities, without checking for these, and actu
|
By
...
· #15323
·
|
|
[PATCH] Add sbindir_nativesdk to environment setup
When adding for example file system generating tools like "mkfs.cramfs" or "mkfs.ubifs" to the SDK, these will be installed into the "${prefix_nativesdk}/sbin" directory, but the generated environment
When adding for example file system generating tools like "mkfs.cramfs" or "mkfs.ubifs" to the SDK, these will be installed into the "${prefix_nativesdk}/sbin" directory, but the generated environment
|
By
...
· #11786
·
|
|
M2/M3.rc1 availability
Dear Saul Wold, In message <51007091.1030609@...> you wrote: I see two issues so far (all with a armv7a based configuration): 1) Building of core-image-lsb-dev and core-image-lsb-sdk fail
Dear Saul Wold, In message <51007091.1030609@...> you wrote: I see two issues so far (all with a armv7a based configuration): 1) Building of core-image-lsb-dev and core-image-lsb-sdk fail
|
By
...
· #11710
·
|
|
M2, M3, M4 milestones available?
Dear John, In message <CAGOhT_fp04iRBj2PqNJSZJJiOw5qzjyqcTZ0rXuDG_GjvhADoQ@...> you wrote: Thanks, understood now. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk
Dear John, In message <CAGOhT_fp04iRBj2PqNJSZJJiOw5qzjyqcTZ0rXuDG_GjvhADoQ@...> you wrote: Thanks, understood now. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk
|
By
...
· #11641
·
|
|
M2, M3, M4 milestones available?
Dear Elizabeth, In message <CAPhnLPCk8byBnRSEB2aMOBPEmZQRfWpNSJ+xj+uX4BVvHKMf=Q@...> you wrote: I see - thanks for the information. All this is pretty much frustrating. I mean, you cannot r
Dear Elizabeth, In message <CAPhnLPCk8byBnRSEB2aMOBPEmZQRfWpNSJ+xj+uX4BVvHKMf=Q@...> you wrote: I see - thanks for the information. All this is pretty much frustrating. I mean, you cannot r
|
By
...
· #11638
·
|
|
M2, M3, M4 milestones available?
Dear Cornel, In message <33115ABC4887814E8A92A08FBC93416B08DC598A@...> you wrote: OK, so we have not reached M3 yet. Thanks. Would it not make sense to regularly update the re
Dear Cornel, In message <33115ABC4887814E8A92A08FBC93416B08DC598A@...> you wrote: OK, so we have not reached M3 yet. Thanks. Would it not make sense to regularly update the re
|
By
...
· #11632
·
|
|
Installation of i686 SDK on a x86_64 machine?
Dear Laurentiu, In message <50FE5F87.4060300@...> you wrote: Done, with a patch included. Please see https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3770 Best regards, Wolfgang Denk
Dear Laurentiu, In message <50FE5F87.4060300@...> you wrote: Done, with a patch included. Please see https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3770 Best regards, Wolfgang Denk
|
By
...
· #11631
·
|
|
Installation of i686 SDK on a x86_64 machine?
Dear Laurentiu, In message <50FE4900.7020804@...> you wrote: ... Sorry, but this bug is about a different problem - the fix overshoots the mark. The following combinations of SDK_ARCH and INST_A
Dear Laurentiu, In message <50FE4900.7020804@...> you wrote: ... Sorry, but this bug is about a different problem - the fix overshoots the mark. The following combinations of SDK_ARCH and INST_A
|
By
...
· #11626
·
|
|
Installation of i686 SDK on a x86_64 machine?
Hi, in previous releases it ha always been possible to install a SDK configured for a i686 machine on both x86 and x86_64 systems. Since commit c04f5435 "populate_sdk_base.bbclass: use SDK_ARCH instea
Hi, in previous releases it ha always been possible to install a SDK configured for a i686 machine on both x86 and x86_64 systems. Since commit c04f5435 "populate_sdk_base.bbclass: use SDK_ARCH instea
|
By
...
· #11624
·
|
|
M2, M3, M4 milestones available?
Hello, I wonder if the M2, M3 and M4 milestones have been reached already? The release schedule [1] says they were due on Nov 26 2012, Dec 24 2012 and Jan 11 2013 respectively, and even lists bugs aga
Hello, I wonder if the M2, M3 and M4 milestones have been reached already? The release schedule [1] says they were due on Nov 26 2012, Dec 24 2012 and Jan 11 2013 respectively, and even lists bugs aga
|
By
...
· #11623
·
|
|
SDK environment LDFLAGS problem?
Dear Bruce, In message <50F59A91.5080806@...> you wrote: This is indeed a problem, and not only with the kernel, but also for example with U-Boot - fortunately there are not that many softwa
Dear Bruce, In message <50F59A91.5080806@...> you wrote: This is indeed a problem, and not only with the kernel, but also for example with U-Boot - fortunately there are not that many softwa
|
By
...
· #11556
·
|