|
Error do_compile libepoxy
thank you for checking :-) that suggests a missing #include <GL/gl.h>
thank you for checking :-) that suggests a missing #include <GL/gl.h>
|
By
Trevor Woerner
· #39602
·
|
|
Error do_compile libepoxy
The original error: ../libepoxy-1.4.3/test/egl_common.c:36:20: error: implicit declaration of function 'XOpenDisplay'; did you mean 'eglGetDisplay'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Display *dp
The original error: ../libepoxy-1.4.3/test/egl_common.c:36:20: error: implicit declaration of function 'XOpenDisplay'; did you mean 'eglGetDisplay'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Display *dp
|
By
Trevor Woerner
· #39595
·
|
|
[poky] Fwd: How to make the os-release package work with local walltime instead of GMT?
Brilliant! Why isn't this the default?
Brilliant! Why isn't this the default?
|
By
Trevor Woerner
· #39551
·
|
|
add kernel modules & dtbo's for Raspberry Pi3
You're missing a colon at the end of the path definition, and you should use the ':=' operator: FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "$(THISDIR)/files:" The path you're introducing is getting added to a bunch o
You're missing a colon at the end of the path definition, and you should use the ':=' operator: FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "$(THISDIR)/files:" The path you're introducing is getting added to a bunch o
|
By
Trevor Woerner
· #39283
·
|
|
[meta-rockchip] The various rockchip layers
Don't forget https://github.com/jackmitch/meta-tinker ;-) Romain started meta-rockchip initially, then I joined, then people from Rockchip joined later. The main goal Romain and I have is to have a me
Don't forget https://github.com/jackmitch/meta-tinker ;-) Romain started meta-rockchip initially, then I joined, then people from Rockchip joined later. The main goal Romain and I have is to have a me
|
By
Trevor Woerner
· #38257
·
|
|
[meta-raspberrypi][PATCH] Revert "qtbase: Enable EGLFS support"
<otavio.salvador@...> wrote: I've been trying (begging) since the start of August to get the above one added to OE-core https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11881
<otavio.salvador@...> wrote: I've been trying (begging) since the start of August to get the above one added to OE-core https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11881
|
By
Trevor Woerner
· #38088
·
|
|
Debugging Yocto Project build failures
Along with the log files, in the "temp" directory of each recipe's work dir (e.g. tmp-glibc/work/cortex7hf-neon-vfpv4-oe-linux-gnueabi/i2c-tools/3.1.2-r0/temp) are "run" scripts (i.e. run.do_compile)
Along with the log files, in the "temp" directory of each recipe's work dir (e.g. tmp-glibc/work/cortex7hf-neon-vfpv4-oe-linux-gnueabi/i2c-tools/3.1.2-r0/temp) are "run" scripts (i.e. run.do_compile)
|
By
Trevor Woerner
· #37424
·
|
|
bitbake memres usecase
Hi, I'm trying to understand if memres is right for me. Every night my machine, via jenkins, grinds away doing about a dozen builds. Each of these builds is for a separate MACHINE, in separate directo
Hi, I'm trying to understand if memres is right for me. Every night my machine, via jenkins, grinds away doing about a dozen builds. Each of these builds is for a separate MACHINE, in separate directo
|
By
Trevor Woerner
· #37259
·
|
|
[PATCH] u-boot-rockchip: update require path
Thanks! :-D
By
Trevor Woerner
· #37128
·
|
|
[PATCH] u-boot-rockchip: update require path
Hey Tom, Excellent question! I was just thinking the same thing myself as I was preparing this patch :-) This patch is a maintenance patch that will allow builds to succeed, but I admit it isn't ideal
Hey Tom, Excellent question! I was just thinking the same thing myself as I was preparing this patch :-) This patch is a maintenance patch that will allow builds to succeed, but I admit it isn't ideal
|
By
Trevor Woerner
· #37121
·
|
|
[PATCH] u-boot-rockchip: update require path
The oe-core recipe was updated (2017.05 -> 2017.07), this recipe needed to be updated to suit. However, this u-boot (from rockchip) is still at version 2017.05. Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner <twoerner
The oe-core recipe was updated (2017.05 -> 2017.07), this recipe needed to be updated to suit. However, this u-boot (from rockchip) is still at version 2017.05. Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner <twoerner
|
By
Trevor Woerner
· #37119
·
|
|
[meta-rockchip][PATCH] linux: 4.11 -> 4.12
Bump mainline kernel to latest release. Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@...> --- recipes-kernel/linux/{linux_4.11.bb => linux_4.12.bb} | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletio
Bump mainline kernel to latest release. Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@...> --- recipes-kernel/linux/{linux_4.11.bb => linux_4.12.bb} | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletio
|
By
Trevor Woerner
· #37020
·
|
|
[meta-rockchip][PATCH] rockchip-gpt-img: fix deprecated notation
The older "IMAGE_DEPENDS..." notation has been deprecated in favour of the newer "do_image_...[depends]" notation. Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@...> --- classes/rockchip-gpt-img.bbcla
The older "IMAGE_DEPENDS..." notation has been deprecated in favour of the newer "do_image_...[depends]" notation. Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@...> --- classes/rockchip-gpt-img.bbcla
|
By
Trevor Woerner
· #36844
·
|
|
Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting
In other words it's being pushed back a week for the US holiday?
In other words it's being pushed back a week for the US holiday?
|
By
Trevor Woerner
· #36840
·
|
|
[meta-chip][PATCH V2 0/3] Initial attempt at flashing instructions.
Andrei, Will you need Drew to submit this as a pull request via github? Best regards, Trevor
Andrei, Will you need Drew to submit this as a pull request via github? Best regards, Trevor
|
By
Trevor Woerner
· #36820
·
|
|
[meta-chip][PATCH V2 0/3] Initial attempt at flashing instructions.
Looks and works great! Thanks for investigating and getting this working :-) Tested-by: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@...>
Looks and works great! Thanks for investigating and getting this working :-) Tested-by: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@...>
|
By
Trevor Woerner
· #36819
·
|
|
[meta-chip] Jenkins, reviews and mailing list
That's all fine. As the maintainer (thank you!) you're welcome to use whatever workflow with which you're the happiest... as long as you update the "Contributing" section of the README :-)
That's all fine. As the maintainer (thank you!) you're welcome to use whatever workflow with which you're the happiest... as long as you update the "Contributing" section of the README :-)
|
By
Trevor Woerner
· #36786
·
|
|
Current state of linux-raspberrypi-rt?
<pderocco@...> wrote: I posted a v1, which worked great, and continues to work great. After posting the v1, lots of feedback was given. One of those pieces of feedback was that I shouldn't i
<pderocco@...> wrote: I posted a v1, which worked great, and continues to work great. After posting the v1, lots of feedback was given. One of those pieces of feedback was that I shouldn't i
|
By
Trevor Woerner
· #36776
·
|
|
using clang for one recipe
I'm investigating moving chromium to a newer version, specifically something much closer to the current Linux stable (59.0.3071.109). My understanding is the chromium developers use clang, which would
I'm investigating moving chromium to a newer version, specifically something much closer to the current Linux stable (59.0.3071.109). My understanding is the chromium developers use clang, which would
|
By
Trevor Woerner
· #36762
·
|
|
using clang for one recipe
I want to have one recipe build with clang instead of gcc (gcc is being used for the rest of the image). I thought this was as simple as adding the following line to the recipe: TOOLCHAIN = "clang" Ad
I want to have one recipe build with clang instead of gcc (gcc is being used for the rest of the image). I thought this was as simple as adding the following line to the recipe: TOOLCHAIN = "clang" Ad
|
By
Trevor Woerner
· #36758
·
|