As meta-intel is no longer a container layer, use meta-xilinx as an example instead. Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@...> --- diff --git a/documentation/bsp-guide/bsp.xml b/document

catching up with all the YP stuff i've missed over the last while and, in the BSP guide in the layers section: https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/bsp-guide/bsp-guide.html#bsp-layers one reads: "

On Thu, 25 Apr 2019, Richard Purdie wrote: ... big snip of warning me about what i'm trying to do ... > This is a bad idea and you're on a path to madness ;-) i already knew that ... i did admit i've

as i mentioned, i'm already living life on the edge doing all this on fedora 30 branched (the unofficial next release), so i'm quite prepared to trip over versioning issues, and testing all this again

that *sort of* sounds like what is happening, but to be pedantic, it's not that cmake can't find binaries in hosttools, it's that *other* packages can't locate cmake on the host even after setting ASS

(warning: i've been away from YP for well over a year and am now studiously trying to catch up, so i have some work to do.) currently trying to build a "core-image-minimal" for a zedboard on my wholly

ah, got it, thanks. rday

so, to confirm what i thought, this is a bug in gnulib which suggests i should dig through the build configuration to see where i can, say, set a PREFERRED_VERSION of a newer version of gnulib that no

trying ASSUME_PROVIDED didn't work all that well, either ... ... | autom4te: need GNU m4 1.4 or later: m4 | make[2]: *** [Makefile:641: autoconf.in] Error 1 ... that's just weird as my installed versi

a few months ago, i ran into (and asked about) a failure building m4-native that you can read here: https://yocto.yoctoproject.narkive.com/6KyM5UvS/m4-native-zedboard-please-port-gnulib-fseeko-c-to-yo

been away from YP for a few months, diving back in, want to build a core-image-minimal for my zedboard, and i will first admit that i'm using a non-approved distro (fully-updated fedora 29): "WARNING:

why are you using both a prepend and the "+=" operator on the same line? rday

i used something like this once upon a time, can't remember where i wrote it up, but i asked about it in some detail back here: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2016-March/028923.html pe

isn't this precisely what MACHINEOVERRIDES is for? rday

i know i've harped on this before, but can people please stop combining the constructs "_append" and "+=" in the same expression? rday

pretty sure you don't need both "_append" and "+=" in the same assignment. rday

for curiosity's sake, i spent a few minutes ignoring the apparent facebook fork and concentrated strictly on the top-level github/openbmc content, and it seems amazingly convoluted. starting here: htt

after just cursory examination of both repos, i have to say, neither of them looks particularly well-organized. or am i just being overly critical? rday

colleague just yesterday asked me a couple questions about openbmc, so i investigated the OE/YP layer, and i'm a bit confused ... the official OE layers page here: https://layers.openembedded.org/laye

topic came up today about docker/container-based solutions for embedded linux systems, and i already know some of that: * meta-virtualization layer has recipes-containers/ recipes * resinOS is tailore