Applied, thanks! :-) Anecdotally, having the bmap file available has the following effect on writing a core-image-base image to a µSD card: without: 33s with: 11s

The Yocto Project mailing lists migrated to a new system and email address a while back. Update the README with the up-to-date information. Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@...> --- READM

Personally, specifying wic should add wic.bmap implicitly. I can't imagine why anyone would want to generate a wic without the bmap to go with it. But my use-case is probably narrow.

Hi Yann, Sorry to nitpick… Could you please tighten up the commit message? For example, please set the subject to something like: "NanoPi-M4: add" or perhaps "NanoPi-M4: add machines" then in the body

<yann.dirson@...> wrote: Sure it would! But then you'd have to get all the BSP layer maintainers to agree on that format and use it… :-/

Hi Yann, Thanks for the patch updates. I'll look at them soon. I feel exactly the same way. By default all arm64 kernels are configured with the one, in-kernel, generic arm64 defconfig. That gives me

Hi Yann, Thanks for your contribution! :-) Traditionally in meta-rockchip this is done using two separate machine files with all the common things factored into a common include file. See tinker-board

Applied. Thank you! :-)

Yocto Technical Team Minutes, Engineering Sync, for March 16, 2021 archive: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ly8nyhO14kDNnFcW2QskANXW3ZT7QwKC5wWVDg9dDH4/edit == disclaimer == Best efforts are made

Yocto Technical Team Minutes, Engineering Sync, for Mar 9, 2021 archive: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ly8nyhO14kDNnFcW2QskANXW3ZT7QwKC5wWVDg9dDH4/edit == disclaimer == Best efforts are made to

Yocto Technical Team Minutes, Engineering Sync, for Mar 2, 2021 archive: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ly8nyhO14kDNnFcW2QskANXW3ZT7QwKC5wWVDg9dDH4/edit == disclaimer == Best efforts are made to

Create a common conf/machine/include/tinker.inc and re-spin - conf/machine/tinker-board.conf - conf/machine-tinker-board-s.conf to just contain the differences. Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner <twoerner

The COMPATIBLE_MACHINE strings were getting unwieldy, so switch to the MACHINEOVERRIDE notation so they're neater. Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@...> --- recipes-kernel/linux/linux-sta

Add support for Radxa's ROCK Pi E device https://wiki.radxa.com/RockpiE It's a great surprise to find upstream U-Boot and the Linux kernel already provide support for this board! On the kernel side th

Yocto Technical Team Minutes, Engineering Sync, for Feb 23, 2021 archive: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ly8nyhO14kDNnFcW2QskANXW3ZT7QwKC5wWVDg9dDH4/edit == disclaimer == Best efforts are made to

You're welcome :-) I take notes every week, but had stopped sending emails to the list at the end of each meeting. A couple people mentioned privately that they appreciate the notes being formatted fo

Yocto Technical Team Minutes, Engineering Sync, for Feb 16 2021 archive: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ly8nyhO14kDNnFcW2QskANXW3ZT7QwKC5wWVDg9dDH4/edit == disclaimer == Best efforts are made to

Yocto Technical Team Minutes, Engineering Sync, for June 9 2020 archive: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ly8nyhO14kDNnFcW2QskANXW3ZT7QwKC5wWVDg9dDH4/edit == disclaimer == Best efforts are made to

Applied, thanks!

Is there any way to make this work with both new (4.10, -dev, -tiny, -rt) and old (5.4) kernels? What if we left the old rock-pi-4 MACHINE for the 5.4 kernel and required one of the new ones for 5.10?