|
#yocto howto use deltask
#yocto
Hi, What about: pkg_postinst_ontarget_${PN}() { : } in your bbappend? This should effectively override the task from a bbappend (except if there are _append for the task). Can't comment on this being
Hi, What about: pkg_postinst_ontarget_${PN}() { : } in your bbappend? This should effectively override the task from a bbappend (except if there are _append for the task). Can't comment on this being
|
By
Quentin Schulz
· #49885
·
|
|
Building a clean image without using sstate-cache
Hi, IIUC, SSTATE_MIRRORS is just a way to prepopulate your local sstate-cache. So you'd need to have SSTATE_MIRRORS="" but also change SSTATE_DIR to some path where no sstate-cache is so that the loca
Hi, IIUC, SSTATE_MIRRORS is just a way to prepopulate your local sstate-cache. So you'd need to have SSTATE_MIRRORS="" but also change SSTATE_DIR to some path where no sstate-cache is so that the loca
|
By
Quentin Schulz
· #49882
·
|
|
Help creating zeek recipe
#yocto
Hi Gary, I'm not sure setup.py is supported for the project as it's empty? So distutils does not look correct to me. You have a makefile (inherit no classes, that;s the default) or Cmakelists (inherit
Hi Gary, I'm not sure setup.py is supported for the project as it's empty? So distutils does not look correct to me. You have a makefile (inherit no classes, that;s the default) or Cmakelists (inherit
|
By
Quentin Schulz
· #49881
·
|
|
The following packages have unmet dependencies: packagegroup-core-x11-base : Depends: packagegroup-core-x11-xserver but it is not going to be installed
#yocto
Hi Pankaj, packagegroup-core-x11-server is a recipe (well, both a recipe and a package) not a feature. If you want to add packagegroup-core-x11-server package to your image, you need to add it to IMAG
Hi Pankaj, packagegroup-core-x11-server is a recipe (well, both a recipe and a package) not a feature. If you want to add packagegroup-core-x11-server package to your image, you need to add it to IMAG
|
By
Quentin Schulz
· #49845
·
|
|
The following packages have unmet dependencies: packagegroup-core-x11-base : Depends: packagegroup-core-x11-xserver but it is not going to be installed
#yocto
Hi Pankaj, Missing x11 in DISTRO_FEATURES in your distro. http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta/recipes-graphics/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-x11-xserver.bb?h=master#n12 (I also
Hi Pankaj, Missing x11 in DISTRO_FEATURES in your distro. http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta/recipes-graphics/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-x11-xserver.bb?h=master#n12 (I also
|
By
Quentin Schulz
· #49829
·
|
|
#yocto
#yocto
Hi Pankaj,
By
Quentin Schulz
· #49823
·
|
|
How to install rrdtool-per package?
bitbake rrdtool -e and look for the line starting with PACKAGECONFIG. CHeck it's set to what you want, if not, look the lines above to understand why it's not set "correctly". Quentin
bitbake rrdtool -e and look for the line starting with PACKAGECONFIG. CHeck it's set to what you want, if not, look the lines above to understand why it's not set "correctly". Quentin
|
By
Quentin Schulz
· #49817
·
|
|
ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'core-image-sato'
#raspberrypi
#yocto
Hi, You have probably added core-image-sato to DEPENDS which is incorrect. You can't add an image recipe as a dependency. Quentin
Hi, You have probably added core-image-sato to DEPENDS which is incorrect. You can't add an image recipe as a dependency. Quentin
|
By
Quentin Schulz
· #49815
·
|
|
Need help understanding #devtool flow to library
#devtool
Hi Stephan, Libraries and binaries are stripped of the debug symbols before adding them to the "normal" package. The version with the debug symbols are usually in the -dbg package of your recipe. You
Hi Stephan, Libraries and binaries are stripped of the debug symbols before adding them to the "normal" package. The version with the debug symbols are usually in the -dbg package of your recipe. You
|
By
Quentin Schulz
· #49786
·
|
|
MACHINE and inc files
Hi Tomek, Because there is a misunderstanding on how _<override> works :) KERNEL_MODULE_AUTOLOAD_velismate += "A" KERNEL_MODULE_AUTOLOAD += "B" does not mean that you add A in case of velismate machin
Hi Tomek, Because there is a misunderstanding on how _<override> works :) KERNEL_MODULE_AUTOLOAD_velismate += "A" KERNEL_MODULE_AUTOLOAD += "B" does not mean that you add A in case of velismate machin
|
By
Quentin Schulz
· #49711
·
|
|
#yocto
#yocto
Hi, _append in most cases require a leading space, i.e. you want: DISTRO_FEATURES_append = " pam" Let us know if that fixes it. Quentin
Hi, _append in most cases require a leading space, i.e. you want: DISTRO_FEATURES_append = " pam" Let us know if that fixes it. Quentin
|
By
Quentin Schulz
· #49570
·
|
|
find utility alternative
Hi Damien, It is? https://git.busybox.net/busybox/tree/findutils/find.c#n206 You need to enable it in busybox config (you can use config fragments IIRC). layers.openembedded.org is your friend. For ex
Hi Damien, It is? https://git.busybox.net/busybox/tree/findutils/find.c#n206 You need to enable it in busybox config (you can use config fragments IIRC). layers.openembedded.org is your friend. For ex
|
By
Quentin Schulz
· #49558
·
|
|
Overwrite a bblcass globally
Hi Ayoub, BBPATH[1] is what's used to locate bbclasses. It's defined in your conf/layer.conf. You can either make sure your layer is parsed before the one having the original systemd.bbclass (in BBLAY
Hi Ayoub, BBPATH[1] is what's used to locate bbclasses. It's defined in your conf/layer.conf. You can either make sure your layer is parsed before the one having the original systemd.bbclass (in BBLAY
|
By
Quentin Schulz
· #49486
·
|
|
overwrite LAYERSERIES_COMPAT_ for different layer
FWIW, you could make the parsing order not matter (at least in thud, from a quick look, master as well). LAYERSERIES_COMPAT is resolved after all layer.conf have been parsed[1]. I do not know if it's
FWIW, you could make the parsing order not matter (at least in thud, from a quick look, master as well). LAYERSERIES_COMPAT is resolved after all layer.conf have been parsed[1]. I do not know if it's
|
By
Quentin Schulz
· #49470
·
|
|
PREFERRED_VERSION
Hi Damienm Conceptually, no. An image recipe is a recipe. Global data is global and local data is local. A recipe (image or package) set local data only. Correct way is different distro or machine. Ob
Hi Damienm Conceptually, no. An image recipe is a recipe. Global data is global and local data is local. A recipe (image or package) set local data only. Correct way is different distro or machine. Ob
|
By
Quentin Schulz
· #49409
·
|
|
what is the proper treatment of the "Unlicense" license?
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 09:53:12AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: [...] > > it gets weirder ... the project i'm working with is based on morty > so that variable *would* still be relevant, but even ad
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 09:53:12AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: [...] > > it gets weirder ... the project i'm working with is based on morty > so that variable *would* still be relevant, but even ad
|
By
Quentin Schulz
· #49399
·
|
|
what is the proper treatment of the "Unlicense" license?
That'll teach me to check in master instead of my release of Yocto :) Quentin
That'll teach me to check in master instead of my release of Yocto :) Quentin
|
By
Quentin Schulz
· #49397
·
|
|
what is the proper treatment of the "Unlicense" license?
Hi Robert, I'm not sure, but there might be a need to add it to SRC_DISTRIBUTE_LICENSES in openembedded-core/meta/conf/licenses.conf. Quentin
Hi Robert, I'm not sure, but there might be a need to add it to SRC_DISTRIBUTE_LICENSES in openembedded-core/meta/conf/licenses.conf. Quentin
|
By
Quentin Schulz
· #49395
·
|
|
what is the proper treatment of the "Unlicense" license?
Hi Robert, You can add a license to your layer by doing the following in conf/layer.conf: LICENSE_PATH += "${LAYERDIR}/licenses" and in there you put the Unlicense file named exactly the same with the
Hi Robert, You can add a license to your layer by doing the following in conf/layer.conf: LICENSE_PATH += "${LAYERDIR}/licenses" and in there you put the Unlicense file named exactly the same with the
|
By
Quentin Schulz
· #49391
·
|
|
[oe][yocto][bitbake] Fetching source using different protocols
Hi Mohamed, Why? What's the exact use case? Maybe you could play with PREMIRROS? (I've never explicitly used that variable though): https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/mega-manual/mega-manual.htm
Hi Mohamed, Why? What's the exact use case? Maybe you could play with PREMIRROS? (I've never explicitly used that variable though): https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/mega-manual/mega-manual.htm
|
By
Quentin Schulz
· #49366
·
|