|
[OE-core] DNS when using Static IP
When using DHCP, busybox's udhcpc script will write the DNS entries that the server returned into the resolv.conf file. In this case, I think you'll have to "provide" resolv.conf in some other way, th
When using DHCP, busybox's udhcpc script will write the DNS entries that the server returned into the resolv.conf file. In this case, I think you'll have to "provide" resolv.conf in some other way, th
|
By
Mike Looijmans
· #19329
·
|
|
[OE-core] RFC: Improving the developer workflow
On 08/07/2014 11:10 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: ... > * Provide tools to allow modifying software for which a recipe already exists. > If the user has an external source tree we use that, otherwise we ca
On 08/07/2014 11:10 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: ... > * Provide tools to allow modifying software for which a recipe already exists. > If the user has an external source tree we use that, otherwise we ca
|
By
Mike Looijmans
· #21006
·
|
|
Sato image runs, but doesn't start its GUI
I finally got around to trying to use our custom board's BSP with Yocto images. Since the board has a touchscreen (well, actually it has two) I built the core-image-sato. I had to tweak the startup a
I finally got around to trying to use our custom board's BSP with Yocto images. Since the board has a touchscreen (well, actually it has two) I built the core-image-sato. I had to tweak the startup a
|
By
Mike Looijmans
· #22179
·
|
|
Sato image runs, but doesn't start its GUI
On 11/13/2014 02:07 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: Ah, thanks, found it. It's set to run at runlevel 5 and somehow my inittab has "3" as its level. Setting it to 5 displays the desktop. Next challenge is to
On 11/13/2014 02:07 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: Ah, thanks, found it. It's set to run at runlevel 5 and somehow my inittab has "3" as its level. Setting it to 5 displays the desktop. Next challenge is to
|
By
Mike Looijmans
· #22183
·
|
|
Sato image touchscreen calibration is borked
On 11/13/2014 02:10 PM, Mike Looijmans wrote: Hmm. That's a big disappointment. I've been using "ts_calibrate" in the past, and that worked just fine on this board. Sato uses an X application for this
On 11/13/2014 02:10 PM, Mike Looijmans wrote: Hmm. That's a big disappointment. I've been using "ts_calibrate" in the past, and that worked just fine on this board. Sato uses an X application for this
|
By
Mike Looijmans
· #22185
·
|
|
Sato image touchscreen calibration is borked
On 11/13/2014 02:28 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: Maybe, but it demonstrates that the hardware and drivers are working just fine. Tried, but that did not help, same problem. I have one of those attached to
On 11/13/2014 02:28 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: Maybe, but it demonstrates that the hardware and drivers are working just fine. Tried, but that did not help, same problem. I have one of those attached to
|
By
Mike Looijmans
· #22187
·
|
|
Sato image touchscreen calibration is borked
On 11/13/2014 02:54 PM, Mike Looijmans wrote: That one works, root@topic-miami-florida-med-xc7z015:~# DISPLAY=0:0 xinput_calibrator -v --devic e event1 DEBUG: XInputExtension version is 2.3 DEBUG: Ski
On 11/13/2014 02:54 PM, Mike Looijmans wrote: That one works, root@topic-miami-florida-med-xc7z015:~# DISPLAY=0:0 xinput_calibrator -v --devic e event1 DEBUG: XInputExtension version is 2.3 DEBUG: Ski
|
By
Mike Looijmans
· #22188
·
|
|
Sato image touchscreen calibration is borked
On 11/13/2014 06:58 PM, Michael Gloff wrote: Interesting option, can you elaborate on that (in particular, in combination with Yocto builds)? Met vriendelijke groet / kind regards, Mike Looijmans Syst
On 11/13/2014 06:58 PM, Michael Gloff wrote: Interesting option, can you elaborate on that (in particular, in combination with Yocto builds)? Met vriendelijke groet / kind regards, Mike Looijmans Syst
|
By
Mike Looijmans
· #22234
·
|
|
sharing directories between users on same machine
For the "download" directory, just set the permissions for the group to allow writing. I've used this with an NFS share that holds all downloads. The machien also runs apache and shares this directory
For the "download" directory, just set the permissions for the group to allow writing. I've used this with an NFS share that holds all downloads. The machien also runs apache and shares this directory
|
By
Mike Looijmans
· #22271
·
|
|
Support for writable files with a read-only root file system
The one-size-fits-all solution is to use an unionfs, and a writable part in RAM or mounted elsewhere, e.g. in flash (typically a tiny jffs2 partition). It requires quite some scripting to get right, y
The one-size-fits-all solution is to use an unionfs, and a writable part in RAM or mounted elsewhere, e.g. in flash (typically a tiny jffs2 partition). It requires quite some scripting to get right, y
|
By
Mike Looijmans
· #22336
·
|
|
parallel build of multiple machine/os?
On 12/10/2014 08:00 PM, Khem Raj wrote: A more convincing use-case for multi-machine building is the emerging of "hybrids". The little/big architecture that puts different versions of ARM CPUs into a
On 12/10/2014 08:00 PM, Khem Raj wrote: A more convincing use-case for multi-machine building is the emerging of "hybrids". The little/big architecture that puts different versions of ARM CPUs into a
|
By
Mike Looijmans
· #22585
·
|
|
External Linux Kernel Module
On 12/10/2014 06:42 AM, Moore, Thomas (FtWorth) wrote: I think that comment is outdated or something that someone wanted to implement some day or so. I've always just named my kernel module recipes "k
On 12/10/2014 06:42 AM, Moore, Thomas (FtWorth) wrote: I think that comment is outdated or something that someone wanted to implement some day or so. I've always just named my kernel module recipes "k
|
By
Mike Looijmans
· #22586
·
|
|
parallel build of multiple machine/os?
On 12/11/2014 08:42 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: The OMAP PRU and DSP each run their own bootloader/kernels (the PRU is just bare metal code), and do not share code with the ARM that runs the rest. From the
On 12/11/2014 08:42 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: The OMAP PRU and DSP each run their own bootloader/kernels (the PRU is just bare metal code), and do not share code with the ARM that runs the rest. From the
|
By
Mike Looijmans
· #22608
·
|
|
addiding external driver to minimal image
Create your own image recipe (hint: "require" another image, or just copy it), that reduces the parse time. Creating the image usually takes less than a minute. You can also just build the new package
Create your own image recipe (hint: "require" another image, or just copy it), that reduces the parse time. Creating the image usually takes less than a minute. You can also just build the new package
|
By
Mike Looijmans
· #22690
·
|
|
[meta-raspberrypi] Why not enable hard floating point?
On 15-01-15 01:11, J. Tang wrote: If the CPU has actual hard-float support, then enabling it should increase floating point performance by an order of magnitude (e.g. 100x faster or so). If you don't
On 15-01-15 01:11, J. Tang wrote: If the CPU has actual hard-float support, then enabling it should increase floating point performance by an order of magnitude (e.g. 100x faster or so). If you don't
|
By
Mike Looijmans
· #23007
·
|
|
Yocto Kernel Module Workflow Question
On 15-01-15 22:51, Glenn Schmottlach wrote: Obvious alternative is to fork the kernel and manage it in your own repo. Using git "rebase" you can keep your changes on top, and git format-patch can gene
On 15-01-15 22:51, Glenn Schmottlach wrote: Obvious alternative is to fork the kernel and manage it in your own repo. Using git "rebase" you can keep your changes on top, and git format-patch can gene
|
By
Mike Looijmans
· #23019
·
|
|
Sharing sstate
On 26-03-15 14:44, Gary Thomas wrote: The hosts need to be similar for the build tools to be recycled. If they have different OS versions, or even different CFLAGS you'll see a rebuild of "native" pac
On 26-03-15 14:44, Gary Thomas wrote: The hosts need to be similar for the build tools to be recycled. If they have different OS versions, or even different CFLAGS you'll see a rebuild of "native" pac
|
By
Mike Looijmans
· #24180
·
|
|
Yocto Header files?
On 16-04-15 13:00, testlaster wrote: Short answer: Put "inherit module" in your recipe to build the module. Example Makefile: https://github.com/topic-embedded-products/kernel-module-vdmafb/blob/maste
On 16-04-15 13:00, testlaster wrote: Short answer: Put "inherit module" in your recipe to build the module. Example Makefile: https://github.com/topic-embedded-products/kernel-module-vdmafb/blob/maste
|
By
Mike Looijmans
· #24483
·
|
|
creating images which include actively developed applications
On 22-04-15 19:58, Paul Eggleton wrote: Man, I've been working with OE for years, and this is the first time I ever saw this. You should create a link to this page using ten feet neon tubes. Seriously
On 22-04-15 19:58, Paul Eggleton wrote: Man, I've been working with OE for years, and this is the first time I ever saw this. You should create a link to this page using ten feet neon tubes. Seriously
|
By
Mike Looijmans
· #24557
·
|
|
armv7 firmware recipe in armv8 distro
Yocto/OE doesn't support multiple "machines" in a single build. You'll have to create a separate yocto build (can use the same environment though) by setting MACHINE to your armv7 firmware system and
Yocto/OE doesn't support multiple "machines" in a single build. You'll have to create a separate yocto build (can use the same environment though) by setting MACHINE to your armv7 firmware system and
|
By
Mike Looijmans
· #24981
·
|