Is there a way to retreive the OE-Build Configuration blob after it rolls off the screen? Or should I just rerun and capture it then?

at the end of the build of core-image-sato-sdk I got the following error. I'm using the edison branch with the latest changes and also building the meta-cedartrail. I had previously built core-image-s

Just an observation. the FAQ link that Autif did looks like a How Do I, which is the section in the Wiki right after the FAQ. Does that matter to anyone? Jim A

I never got a complete good build after I updated some unknown items in Ubuntu 11.10 dev system and did a recent git pull until I did a completely new bitbake core-image-sato to a new build directory.

I regularly do Ubuntu update, I guess I should make sure that is really necessary. I know a few updates came in last week before the latest pull. Not sure what they updated. Live and learn :-) It seem

After I fixed mesa-dri and started bitbake core-image-sato, it ran for a long time and had a build failure similar to the first one on kexec-tools. I did the bitbake -c cleansstate kexec-tools trick a

No to question on rm_work in local.conf This work without errors. I'm now doing bitbake core-image-sato to see if it completes. So if I do a git pull and want to retest with new stuff, just bitbake co

I had a preview successful build and just reran that after bitbake -c cleanall core-image-sato JIm A

Building on latest release Ubuntu 11.10 (Linux ubuntu-x64 3.0.0-16-generic #29-Ubuntu SMP) gcc is 4.6.1 Jim A

Just did a git pull today on poky and meta-intel. I tried to rebuild meta-sugarbay again and got a build error. Not sure why yet. Not critical, just a spot check of things. ------------------ NOTE: pa

I can see how 'git checkout 1.2_M3' can set you up on the branch 1.2_M3 and you will get all new changes applied to that branch each time you do 'git pull' right?? However, does 'git checkout 1.2_M3.f

Dumb question Alert! So if I want to test with 1.2_M3.final, what is the correct way using git? I periodically 'git pull' in poky and meta-intel directories while master is checked out. From doing tha

Duh! That was too easy. Not sure why it was not obvious to me. Thanks, So I put all my videos into a directory called myvideos-1.0 and tar gz'ed the whole directory. now the following works: DESCRIPTI

So what I can get to work is the following recipe, but what I want is not o have to specify the file extension: DESCRIPTION = "my video test files" SECTION = "examples" LICENSE = "CLOSED" MY_DESTINATI

Thanks, I know I can change S, but I need to change where do_unpack puts the files. with them in WORKDIR, I can't just say WORKDIR/* because there are a lot of other files and directories at that leve

I was doing a "bitbake -c cleanall myvideos" before each run of bitbake myvideos, but I just now tried bitbake myvideos -c cleansstate with no change in behavior. It seems clear to me that do_unpack u

that didn't solve the problem. I still get file not found errors. The videos are unpack to WORKDIR, but the do_install is looking for them in S. install -d /build/sugarbay-master/tmp/work/x86_64-poky-

I have some issues that seem to be related to where everything gets unpacked and where it thinks it needs to install from. Below is my recipe file name "myvideos_1.0.bb" DESCRIPTION = "my video test f

Suppose I want to build the meta-intel/meta-sugarbay image and also include some video and audio files into the /home/root directory to facilitate testing of the video and audio players. Can I include

Another thought. I hope the glossary in Poky Reference Manual will get changed to reflect this?? It isn't right now, but 1.2_M3 may not be done yet.