|
should all "IMAGE_INSTALL +=" become "IMAGE_INSTALL_append"?
You are referring to section 5.2.1 if I am not correct, not 3.2.1? The context is important here. 5.2.1 is discussing using the variable as part of your local.conf. Which is a different animal then ad
You are referring to section 5.2.1 if I am not correct, not 3.2.1? The context is important here. 5.2.1 is discussing using the variable as part of your local.conf. Which is a different animal then ad
|
By
Jeremy Puhlman
· #48399
·
|
|
[meta-selinux][PATCH 2/2] findutils: make append generic
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Puhlman <jpuhlman@...> --- .../findutils/{findutils_4.6.%.bbappend =3D> findutils_%.bbappend} | 0 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) rename recipes-extended/f
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Puhlman <jpuhlman@...> --- .../findutils/{findutils_4.6.%.bbappend =3D> findutils_%.bbappend} | 0 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) rename recipes-extended/f
|
By
Jeremy Puhlman
· #48219
·
|
|
[meta-selinux][PATCH 1/2] python: move appends to a dynamic-layer
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Puhlman <jpuhlman@...> --- conf/layer.conf | 2 ++ .../recipes-devtools}/python/files/sitecustomize.py | 0 .../python2-layer/recipes-devtools}/python/python_%.bbappend | 0
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Puhlman <jpuhlman@...> --- conf/layer.conf | 2 ++ .../recipes-devtools}/python/files/sitecustomize.py | 0 .../python2-layer/recipes-devtools}/python/python_%.bbappend | 0
|
By
Jeremy Puhlman
· #48218
·
|
|
[meta-selinux][PATCH] e2fsprogs: Update patch for current master
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Puhlman <jpuhlman@...> --- .../files/misc_create_inode.c-label_rootfs.patch | 20 ++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/recipes
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Puhlman <jpuhlman@...> --- .../files/misc_create_inode.c-label_rootfs.patch | 20 ++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/recipes
|
By
Jeremy Puhlman
· #41770
·
|
|
Hook for layer-only actions?
It is. You more or less just need to figure out which layer the recipe comes from. Then you can build functions on top of that. https://github.com/MontaVista-OpenSourceTechnology/meta-montavista-cgx/b
It is. You more or less just need to figure out which layer the recipe comes from. Then you can build functions on top of that. https://github.com/MontaVista-OpenSourceTechnology/meta-montavista-cgx/b
|
By
Jeremy Puhlman
· #41744
·
|
|
[meta-cgl][PATCH] Add LAYERSERIES_COMPAT
From: "Jeremy A. Puhlman" <jpuhlman@...> --- meta-cgl-common/conf/layer.conf | 2 +- meta-cgl-fsl-ppc/conf/layer.conf | 1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta-cgl-
From: "Jeremy A. Puhlman" <jpuhlman@...> --- meta-cgl-common/conf/layer.conf | 2 +- meta-cgl-fsl-ppc/conf/layer.conf | 1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta-cgl-
|
By
Jeremy Puhlman
· #41203
·
|
|
executable depends on the library that is built in the same recipe
Given it is looking for libMyTool.so and not a versioned library, my guess is that the shared library is not setting a proper soname when being built. All libraries should be built with a soname, and
Given it is looking for libMyTool.so and not a versioned library, my guess is that the shared library is not setting a proper soname when being built. All libraries should be built with a soname, and
|
By
Jeremy Puhlman
· #39121
·
|
|
Release directory layout 2.3.2
Was the change to the directory structure release for 2.3.2 intentional. All the other releases are under: http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/yocto/yocto-<release version> where as 2.3.2 is ht
Was the change to the directory structure release for 2.3.2 intentional. All the other releases are under: http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/yocto/yocto-<release version> where as 2.3.2 is ht
|
By
Jeremy Puhlman
· #38028
·
|
|
BBMASK not working for me?
This basically concatenates qemu to what ever is already in BBMASK. It is a regex expression so you want to treat it as such. You want to likely do something like: BBMASK .= "|(qemu)" OTOH, qemu match
This basically concatenates qemu to what ever is already in BBMASK. It is a regex expression so you want to treat it as such. You want to likely do something like: BBMASK .= "|(qemu)" OTOH, qemu match
|
By
Jeremy Puhlman
· #34786
·
|
|
Best practice for building a large amount of source files
Not necessarily best practice, but it is something that bitbake has supported. If you create a directory under myapplication_1.0 that is unique and not an override, you can specify the directory name
Not necessarily best practice, but it is something that bitbake has supported. If you create a directory under myapplication_1.0 that is unique and not an override, you can specify the directory name
|
By
Jeremy Puhlman
· #27680
·
|
|
Packaging an externally built library?
Because the package list has PN at the end by default: PACKAGES="${@bb.utils.contains('PTEST_ENABLED', '1', '${PN}-ptest', '', d)} ${PN}-dbg ${PN}-staticdev ${PN}-dev ${PN}-doc ${PN}-locale ${PACKAGE_
Because the package list has PN at the end by default: PACKAGES="${@bb.utils.contains('PTEST_ENABLED', '1', '${PN}-ptest', '', d)} ${PN}-dbg ${PN}-staticdev ${PN}-dev ${PN}-doc ${PN}-locale ${PACKAGE_
|
By
Jeremy Puhlman
· #26983
·
|
|
In consistancy in the defition of BBFILE_COLLECTIONS in layer.conf
I was working with some layerinfo code, and I noticed that the value of BBFILE_COLLECTIONS in layer.conf in the meta-intel repo are kind of all over the map: for each in */conf/layer.conf; do cat $eac
I was working with some layerinfo code, and I noticed that the value of BBFILE_COLLECTIONS in layer.conf in the meta-intel repo are kind of all over the map: for each in */conf/layer.conf; do cat $eac
|
By
Jeremy Puhlman
· #1457
·
|