|
pseudo interaction issue
BitBake always runs with pseudo loaded but disabled. When we fork a child, we decide whether to enable it or not and setup the environment to either bring pseudo to life, or unload it from memory enti
BitBake always runs with pseudo loaded but disabled. When we fork a child, we decide whether to enable it or not and setup the environment to either bring pseudo to life, or unload it from memory enti
|
By
Richard Purdie
· #5521
·
|
|
pseudo interaction issue
This is pretty much what we do at the moment, it gets unset after we load. Pseudo is of course disabled at this point. I guess we just got lucky to this point and avoided "Bad Things"? Cheers, Richard
This is pretty much what we do at the moment, it gets unset after we load. Pseudo is of course disabled at this point. I guess we just got lucky to this point and avoided "Bad Things"? Cheers, Richard
|
By
Richard Purdie
· #5536
·
|
|
pseudo interaction issue
This is why I'm not saying lets just set PSEUDO_PREFIX. Its bothering me too. Obviously :). Except the code does this and I've watched it happen. I'm not claiming to understand it... When we poke new
This is why I'm not saying lets just set PSEUDO_PREFIX. Its bothering me too. Obviously :). Except the code does this and I've watched it happen. I'm not claiming to understand it... When we poke new
|
By
Richard Purdie
· #5548
·
|
|
tentative list of vars to be dropped from variable glossary
BBMASK removes recipes from being parsed. It does not remove them from images although that would I guess be an indirect result since you could no longer build them. Its designed so that if you for ex
BBMASK removes recipes from being parsed. It does not remove them from images although that would I guess be an indirect result since you could no longer build them. Its designed so that if you for ex
|
By
Richard Purdie
· #5566
·
|
|
tentative list of vars to be dropped from variable glossary
I hadn't realised Scott had added this to the customising images section of the manual. This is not what its designed for and we need to move this to somewhere less confusing. Scott: This is going to
I hadn't realised Scott had added this to the customising images section of the manual. This is not what its designed for and we need to move this to somewhere less confusing. Scott: This is going to
|
By
Richard Purdie
· #5607
·
|
|
Moving angstrom under the yocto banner
In the interests of clarity, as Tracey will tell you there is no "Yocto" (which is an SI prefix), only the "Yocto Project" :). I know some of us have bad habits but since we're trying to ensure we're
In the interests of clarity, as Tracey will tell you there is no "Yocto" (which is an SI prefix), only the "Yocto Project" :). I know some of us have bad habits but since we're trying to ensure we're
|
By
Richard Purdie
· #5692
·
|
|
Moving angstrom under the yocto banner
I was surprised to hear that but its easy enough to test: diff -ur bitbake/ ../bitbake/ Only in bitbake//bin: bitbake-runtask Only in ../bitbake/: classes Only in ../bitbake/: conf Only in ../bitbake/
I was surprised to hear that but its easy enough to test: diff -ur bitbake/ ../bitbake/ Only in bitbake//bin: bitbake-runtask Only in ../bitbake/: classes Only in ../bitbake/: conf Only in ../bitbake/
|
By
Richard Purdie
· #5719
·
|
|
[PATCH 1/1] linux-yocto-tiny: Prefer 3.2
Merged to master, thanks. Richard
Merged to master, thanks. Richard
|
By
Richard Purdie
· #5737
·
|
|
Moving angstrom under the yocto banner
I don't think there is common ground in this area to work with. There is a certain class of users who really need a single repo with all the pieces in to get started with. Poky and some of the solutio
I don't think there is common ground in this area to work with. There is a certain class of users who really need a single repo with all the pieces in to get started with. Poky and some of the solutio
|
By
Richard Purdie
· #5744
·
|
|
[PATCH 1/1] meta-yocto/local.conf.sample: change = to ?= for BB_NUMBER_THREADS and PARALLEL_MAKE
If the user has used "=" in their configuration files, hob needs to deal with this. It is not acceptable to patch the world to revolve around hob. So, no, I'm not going to take this patch, sorry. Chee
If the user has used "=" in their configuration files, hob needs to deal with this. It is not acceptable to patch the world to revolve around hob. So, no, I'm not going to take this patch, sorry. Chee
|
By
Richard Purdie
· #5745
·
|
|
Installation order question with RPM backend
Let me jump in here since I've looked at the rpm code paths in question before. RPM basically works its way through the install manifest so if you have for example: base-passwd shadow dbus-1 libc then
Let me jump in here since I've looked at the rpm code paths in question before. RPM basically works its way through the install manifest so if you have for example: base-passwd shadow dbus-1 libc then
|
By
Richard Purdie
· #6013
·
|
|
Build time data
Note the key here is that for a system with large amounts of memory, you can effectively keep the build in memory due to the long commit time. All the tests I've done show we are not IO bound anyway.
Note the key here is that for a system with large amounts of memory, you can effectively keep the build in memory due to the long commit time. All the tests I've done show we are not IO bound anyway.
|
By
Richard Purdie
· #6065
·
|
|
[PATCH 0/4] yocto-bsp fixes
Merged to master, thanks. Richard
Merged to master, thanks. Richard
|
By
Richard Purdie
· #6086
·
|
|
native recipe and sysroot-destdir troubles
So just to follow up here too for the list archives: This “craziness” does have a rational explanation. “native” targets are meant to run on the system they’re built on and run in the location they’re
So just to follow up here too for the list archives: This “craziness” does have a rational explanation. “native” targets are meant to run on the system they’re built on and run in the location they’re
|
By
Richard Purdie
· #6088
·
|
|
bitbake gets confused with ~/user-config.jam
This sounds like a host contamination issue, we shoudn't be looking at files like that during the build. We probably need to stop the system looking at those files but I'm not familiar with boost to k
This sounds like a host contamination issue, we shoudn't be looking at files like that during the build. We probably need to stop the system looking at those files but I'm not familiar with boost to k
|
By
Richard Purdie
· #6089
·
|
|
[PATCH 0/1] [1.2] poky-tiny: Separate the libc features required for meta-toolchain
I had a thought about this: diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/default-distrovars.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/default-distrovars.inc index 16b3108..f770919 100644 --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/
I had a thought about this: diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/default-distrovars.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/default-distrovars.inc index 16b3108..f770919 100644 --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/
|
By
Richard Purdie
· #6124
·
|
|
[PATCH 0/3] kernel26 cleanup
I've merged these, thanks. and I've passed this on to Scott to handle. Cheers, Richard
I've merged these, thanks. and I've passed this on to Scott to handle. Cheers, Richard
|
By
Richard Purdie
· #6126
·
|
|
Writing do_install_append for target and virtclass-native in a bbappend
_append variables stack so if you do: A_append = "x" A_append = "y" A_append = "z" You'll end up with A = "xyz". You can do something a little more ugly to work around it like: do_install_append () {
_append variables stack so if you do: A_append = "x" A_append = "y" A_append = "z" You'll end up with A = "xyz". You can do something a little more ugly to work around it like: do_install_append () {
|
By
Richard Purdie
· #6127
·
|
|
Writing do_install_append for target and virtclass-native in a bbappend
We're going to need to get out of this habit since it breaks for multilibs :( Cheers, Richard
We're going to need to get out of this habit since it breaks for multilibs :( Cheers, Richard
|
By
Richard Purdie
· #6128
·
|
|
[PATCH 0/1] [1.2] poky-tiny: Separate the libc features required for meta-toolchain
I screwed up and accidentally merged the above in another commit. Thankfully the code actually works and I'm therefore not going to revert it and it will go into the release. I tried a quick build wit
I screwed up and accidentally merged the above in another commit. Thankfully the code actually works and I'm therefore not going to revert it and it will go into the release. I tried a quick build wit
|
By
Richard Purdie
· #6145
·
|