All – I’m prepping to give a talk at LinuxCon next week on an update to the Yocto Project, and I would like to create a slide which shows a bunch of devices which are based on YP. Can you please send

Seth – it sounds like you need something different than an overview class. I think you might want to have one of the consultants who are familiar with building projects using the Yocto Project work fo

Tim - great to hear! Saul/Michael - thanks for your help.

Hey Matthew - This comes down to a resource trade-off, which is why I'm replying. :-) As an open source project and not a product, we have to set some boundaries on how long we will put effort on a gi

Whether it is reasonable or not, if it's possible for people to shoot themselves in the foot, they will. Even with safety guards on a circular saw, I have seen people routinely disable them, so there

Nice update! I particularly like the availability of the sources and source manifest. Not sure how we will be able to do the “test” feature on page 28 across the web. Dave

Guys - I'm really struggling with this overall concept of concurrency. It implies that if Paul and I are sharing the same project and I make a change to a .bb file to experiment with something (assumi

Gang – I was talking with Jessica today about the WebHob design and how we want to prioritize some of the feature development. (And I want to say here, I really appreciate the clarity and thought proc

Guys - thanks for the update, this explains things better for me. Questions: 1. So you will be communicating with the bitbake server using SOAP rather than REST? Can we just call it SOAP (the specific

Gang - there are a couple of ideas for Web Hob that we have talked about. I don't remember seeing them in the various movies and documents. So I'm going to throw them out there to get your feedback an

I just delete the tmp directory and that seems to get the result I want - remove all the binaries but doesn't delete the sources.

Thanks for adding the annotation to the WDD chart on how you compute it. :-)

You are not missing a thing, because I don't think you are the target user for the Build Appliance. :-) What I did find is that there are a number of *very* smart people who were failing at doing a bu

Yes indeed, we should have consistent naming for this feature. The problem is, neither name is very good. "build-appliance" = an implication that the thing "just works" like an appliance should just w

Is anybody using devshell actively who can recreate this section of bitbake.conf?

I thought we had some Sandy Bridge BSP already?

Friends - it looks very good. A couple of comments... * This could be a great way for an organization to implement a workflow process using YP, rather than try to invent one themselves. We have gotten

By the way, if there is no theme set, will the app use a reasonable default?

This should actually read as optional for compliance with the BSP Guide. I've already asked Scott to work on an explicit list of "required" vs "optional" items to conform with the guide to make this c