Hello, Can someone point to a 'life cycle statement' for Yocto versions, one that discusses limited bug fixing peroid and ultimate EOL of a version. I am having trouble find it. Regards, Armin

On 4/16/14, 1:21 PM, Stewart, David C wrote: Thanks Stewart. That is what I was looking for. regards, Armin > I found the following comments at > https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/FAQ#What_is_the_rel

Hello, I am trying to build meta-selinux and ran into some build issues. I started by cloning poky and meta-selinux. I am using master on both. When I run "bitbake core-image-selinux", I get the follo

There are two versions of gnupg so limit the wildcard to the 2.x series Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster@...> --- recipes-support/gnupg/{gnupg_2.0.22.bbappend => gnupg_2.%.bbappend} | 0 1 f

There was a patch posted on April 7th ( sorry don't have original email) From: "Alexandru.Vaduva" <Alexandru.Vaduva at enea.com> The problem is well known for 64 bits architectures and the solution is

Hello, Is there a maintainer for meta-secruity? There is no one listed in the README nor where to submitted patches. Can someone shed some light on this ? regards, Armin

Add Maintainers statement to README and add self to list. Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster@...> --- README | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/README b/README in

Updated to later version on nmap. remove patch which is included in update Added ndiff package Include zenmap build changes but commented out for now and untested Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster@

Updated to later version on nmap. remove patch which is included in update Added ndiff package Include zenmap build changes but commented out for now and untested Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster@

This fixes; ERROR: QA Issue: pinentry: The compile log indicates that host include and/or library paths were used. Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster@...> --- recipes-security/pinentry/pinent

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster@...> --- recipes-security/checksec/checksec_1.5.bb | 16 + recipes-security/checksec/files/checksec.sh | 882 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 89

To aid in testing I have create an image and packagegroups. By setting "DISTRO=poky-security" in the local.conf, the security_flag.inc will be included. This was varified by checksec utility. Armin Ku

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster@...> --- .../packagegroup/packagegroup-core-security.bb | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+) create mode 100644 recipes-security/pac

this will aid in testing Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster@...> --- recipes-security/images/core-image-security.bb | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) create mode 10064

This allows us to include security_flags.inc Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster@...> --- conf/distro/poky-security.conf | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) create mode 100644 conf/distro

will fix in V2 . thanks, Armin

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster@...> --- recipes-security/packagegroup/packagegroup-core-security.bb | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/recipes-security/packagegroup/packag

oops. ignore this. - Armin

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster@...> --- .../packagegroup/packagegroup-core-security.bb | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+) create mode 100644 recipes-security/pac

Paul, Sure the distro config patch can be dropped. Thanks for the feedback. regards, Armin