Date   
[dunfell][PATCH 1/2] bitbake: git.py: Use the correct branch to check if the repository has LFS objects. By Mikko Rapeli · #52144 ·
Re: git lfs not working in dunfell By Richard Purdie · #52143 ·
[meta-mingw] [PATCH 2/2] README: Add instructions for configuring git repo for sending patches By Richard Purdie · #52142 ·
[meta-mingw] [PATCH 1/2] libiconv: Update to work with autoconf 2.70 By Richard Purdie · #52141 ·
[meta-gplv2] [PATCH 3/3] grep: Update to work with autoconf 2.70 By Richard Purdie · #52140 ·
[meta-gplv2] [PATCH 2/3] diffutils: Update to work with autoconf 2.70 By Richard Purdie · #52139 ·
[meta-gplv2] [PATCH 1/3] bash: Update to work with autoconf 2.70 By Richard Purdie · #52138 ·
Re: Kernel Initramfs Problems By Martin Townsend <mtownsend1973@...> · #52137 ·
Re: Task only for target recipe By Richard Purdie · #52136 ·
Task only for target recipe By Ayoub Zaki · #52135 ·
git lfs not working in dunfell By Marek Belisko · #52134 ·
[meta-selinux][PATCH] policycoreutils: Improve reproducibility By Oleksiy Obitotskyy · #52133 ·
Re: any interest in an official "meta-rubygems" layer? By Robert P. J. Day · #52132 ·
Re: any interest in an official "meta-rubygems" layer? By VIVAVIS AG · #52131 ·
Re: [meta-zephyr] bitbake zephyr-helloworld configure failure By Tim Orling · #52130 ·
Re: Including binary application as part of the image output By Richard Purdie · #52129 ·
Re: Including binary application as part of the image output By chuck kamas · #52128 ·
Re: any interest in an official "meta-rubygems" layer? By Armin Kuster · #52127 ·
Re: Including binary application as part of the image output By chuck kamas · #52126 ·
Re: any interest in an official "meta-rubygems" layer? By Robert P. J. Day · #52125 ·
2161 - 2180 of 54277