[meta-security][PATCH] suricata: fix compile issue
make[2]: *** No rule to make target '../rust/target/arm-poky-linux-gnueabi/release/libsuricata.a', needed by 'suricata'
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808@...> --- recipes-ids/suricata/suricata_6.0.6.bb | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/recipes-ids/suricata/suricata_6.0.6.bb b/recipes-ids/suricata/suricata_6.0.6.bb index 35054ef..efa4bdd 100644 --- a/recipes-ids/suricata/suricata_6.0.6.bb +++ b/recipes-ids/suricata/suricata_6.0.6.bb @@ -145,6 +145,8 @@ export logdir = "${localstatedir}/log" CACHED_CONFIGUREVARS = "ac_cv_func_malloc_0_nonnull=yes ac_cv_func_realloc_0_nonnull=yes" do_configure:prepend () { + # use host for RUST_SURICATA_LIB_XC_DIR + sed -i -e 's:host_alias:host:' ${S}/configure.ac oe_runconf } -- 2.25.1 |
|
Re: question about PREFERRED_RPROVIDER
Richard Purdie
On Sat, 2022-08-13 at 17:57 +0800, John Wang wrote:
Hi,"virtual" entries only work in PROVIDES and PREFERRED_PROVIDER, not in the runtime version of the variable. Cheers, Richard |
|
question about PREFERRED_RPROVIDER
John Wang
Hi,
There is a package with two versions, private and public. But when I use the PREFERRED_RPROVIDER to select the public version, bitbake still tries fetch the private one, and then bitabke terminates because do_fetch fails (no permission) What I expect is that when I select the public repository version, it should not fetch the private repository, am I right? Or, should I not use the PREFERRED_RPROVIDER to select a public/private repo ? Could someone guide me :) feature-public.bb ``` SRC_URI = "git://public" RPROVIDES:${PN} += " \ virtual-feature \ " ``` feature-private.bb ``` SRC_URI= "git://private" RPROVIDES:${PN} += " \ virtual-feature \ " ``` machine.conf ``` PREFERRED_RPROVIDER_virtual-feature = "feature-public" ``` |
|
Re: A bitbake error caused by "Variable BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE"
#bitbake
Alexander Kanavin
Hello,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
you probably need to exit the shell and then restart it and re-initialize your environment (with oe-init-build-env), as it contains the obsolete variable. Alex On Sat, 13 Aug 2022 at 05:13, <lucky33newman@...> wrote:
|
|
A bitbake error caused by "Variable BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE"
#bitbake
Yan Xinkuan
Hellow everyone, this is Yan. I am new to Yocto Project, still, I am learning.
There is a question, when I bitbaked my image I found this ERROR: yanxk@yanxk-Ubuntu:~/Yocto/poky/build$ bitbake core-image-sato
ERROR: Variable BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE has been renamed to BB_ENV_PASSTHROUGH_ADDITIONS
ERROR: Variable BB_ENV_EXTRAWHITE from the shell environment has been renamed to BB_ENV_PASSTHROUGH_ADDITIONS
ERROR: Exiting to allow enviroment variables to be corrected
How can I do a quick fix, and why is it working wrong? By the way, I check the link https://git.openembedded.org/bitbake/commit/?id=87104b6a167188921da157c7dba45938849fb22a , which most likely the main cause. Waiting for a help. |
|
Re: [meta-security][PATCH] samhain-standalone: fix buildpaths issue
merged
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 8/11/22 02:40, Yu, Mingli wrote:
From: Mingli Yu <mingli.yu@...> |
|
Re: [meta-security][PATCH V2] meta-security: Add recipe for Glome
merged
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 8/8/22 11:40, John Broadbent via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
From: John Edward Broadbent <jebr@...> |
|
Re: [meta-cgl][PATCH] resource-agents: Bug fix.
Merged.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 8/7/2022 7:22 PM, leimaohui wrote:
Fix error as the fowllowing: |
|
Unable to add .bb in a layer - newcomer to Yocto
#yocto
shauli.arazi@...
Hi all,
I have taken on myself a task to write a custom Yocto-based image for Nvidia Xavier which poses somewhat of a difficult task. After few videos on Youtube and some documentation, I started writing a new layer on-top of the tegra and poky layer as follows - meta                 /home/shauli/Git/poky/meta               5 meta-poky            /home/shauli/Git/poky/meta-poky          5 meta-yocto-bsp       /home/shauli/Git/poky/meta-yocto-bsp     5 meta-tegra           /home/shauli/Git/poky/meta-tegra         5 meta-xtra            /home/shauli/Git/poky/meta-xtra          6 meta-xtra is the new layer I wrote that has a .bb file which is supposed to edit the Nvidia logo screen to a custom logo I made. Should be fairly simple. I copied the logo .bb file from the meta-tegra to my own layer under its own folder. meta-xtra/ ├── conf │  └── layer.conf ├── COPYING.MIT ├── README ├── recipes-core │  └── images │      └── xtra-l4t.bb └── recipes-logo    ├── xtra-bootlogo    │  ├── bootlogo.inc    │  ├── files    │  │  └── xtra_logo.tar.gz    │  └── xtra-bootlogo.bb As can be seen above, I created a new image named xtra-l4t, a logo .bb file which, and the a regular layer.conf file which includes all the .bb files in the subfolders (same as the example). The problem I am facing is that while building either the core-image-base or the xtra-l4t image, the .bb simply doesn't do anything. I had syntax errors in the do_compile () function which I noticed only after compiling the .bb file directly using $ bitbake xtra-bootlogo. The $ bitbake xtra-l4t has no affect whatsoever from the .bb file.  I tried adding IMAGE_INSTALL:append = " xtra-bootlogo" to the xtra-l4t.bb file which lead to the following error. ERROR: Task do_populate_sdk in /home/shauli/Git/poky/meta-xtra/recipes-core/images/xtra-l4t.bb rdepends upon non-existent task do_package_write_deb in /home/shauli/Git/poky/meta-xtra/recipes-logo/xtra-bootlogo/xtra-bootlogo.bb I think there is something fundamental about how Yocto works which I fail to understand. This is the logo .bb file - do_compile() {    LIST=""    if [ "${@bb.utils.contains("PACKAGECONFIG", "raw", "1", "0", d)}" = "1" ]; then        if [ ! -s "${S}/${RAW_GRAPHIC_FILE}" ]; then            bbfatal "RAW_GRAPHIC_FILE must exist"        fi        cook_bitmaps "${S}/${RAW_GRAPHIC_FILE}"    else        if [ ! -s "${S}/${COOKED_CONFIG_FILE}" ]; then            bbfatal "COOKED_CONFIG_FILE must exist"        fi        while read _line        do            _line="${S}/${_line}"            LIST="${LIST}${_line};"        done < ${S}/${COOKED_CONFIG_FILE}    fi    # NB that '%?' gets rid of the trailing ';' because BMP_generator blows up    LIST="${LIST%?}"    rm -f ${B}/bmp.blob    rm -f ${B}/bmp-compressed.blob    OUT=${B} ${STAGING_BINDIR_NATIVE}/${FLASHTOOLS_DIR}/BMP_generator_L4T.py -t bmp -e "${LIST}" -v 0    if [ ! -s ${B}/bmp.blob ]; then        bbfatal "BMP_generator_L4T.py failed to create bmp.blob"    fi    compress_blob "${B}/bmp.blob" "${B}/bmp-compressed.blob"    if [ ! -s ${B}/bmp-compressed.blob ]; then        bbfatal "failed to create compressed bmp-compressed.blob"    fi } do_deploy() {    install -d ${DEPLOYDIR}    install -m 0644 ${B}/bmp-compressed.blob ${DEPLOYDIR}/${BMP_BLOB}    # Should overwrite Nvidia's symlink    ln -sf ${BMP_BLOB} ${DEPLOYDIR}/${BMP_SYMLINK} } PACKAGE_ARCH = "${MACHINE_ARCH}" do_install[noexec] = "1" addtask deploy before do_build after do_install Any help would be very much appreciated. Thanks, Shauli |
|
[meta-mingw][PATCH] Switch to HOSTTOOLS_NONFATAL
Joshua Watt
The changes to split classes into global vs. image specific contexts
has broken the inclusion of `wine` and `wineserver` host tools for testing MinGW SDKs. This is because testsdk is an image specific class and therefore it's inclusion is not detected globally and the wine host tools are not present so the SDK tests fail. Resolve this by using HOSTTOOLS_NONFATAL which will include the tools if they exist, but won't fail if they are not present. This does mean that users will now not know they need wine "up front" when doing a build, but it will instead fail later when they actually try to test the SDK, but there isn't really a better way to fix this. Signed-off-by: Joshua Watt <JPEWhacker@...> --- conf/machine-sdk/include/mingw32-common.inc | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/conf/machine-sdk/include/mingw32-common.inc b/conf/machine-sdk/include/mingw32-common.inc index 966c63b..07b5b8f 100644 --- a/conf/machine-sdk/include/mingw32-common.inc +++ b/conf/machine-sdk/include/mingw32-common.inc @@ -50,5 +50,4 @@ DISABLE_STATIC:mingw32 = "" GCCPIE:mingw32 = "" # wine and wineserver are required to test MinGW SDKs -HOSTTOOLS += "${@'wine wineserver' if (bb.utils.contains_any('IMAGE_CLASSES', 'testsdk', True, False, d) or any(x in (d.getVar("BBINCLUDED") or "") for x in ["testsdk.bbclass"])) else ''}" - +HOSTTOOLS_NONFATAL += "wine wineserver" -- 2.33.0 |
|
Re: Remvove unwanted Udev rules
it is part of systemd recipe if your distro is based on systemd. In
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
that case, you can write a bbappend where you define do_install:append() and delete it from staging area before it gets packaged On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 10:59 PM Nikhil Patil <nvpatil2736@...> wrote:
|
|
Minutes: Yocto Project Weekly Triage Meeting 8/4/2022
sakib.sajal@...
Wiki: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Bug_Triage Attendees: Steve Sakoman, Joshua Watt, Randy Macleod,
Richard Purdie, Aryaman, Bruce Ashfield, Michael Opdenacker,
Alexandre Belloni, Pavel Zhukov, Alexandre Belloni, Alejandro
Hernandez, Paulo Neves, Satthishkumar Duraisamy ARs: Notes:
N/A
Medium+ 4.1 Unassigned Enhancements/Bugs: 78 (Last week
78) AB Bugs: 54
(Last week 50)
|
|
meta-security build failure: suricata
Hello,
I am aware of a new build failure with suricata. I think it related to the glibc update. https://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Build/150774/ I will have limited time to look into this in the next few weeks. - armin |
|
[meta-security][PATCH] samhain-standalone: fix buildpaths issue
Yu, Mingli
From: Mingli Yu <mingli.yu@...>
Fixes: WARNING: samhain-standalone-4.4.9-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: File /usr/share/doc/samhain-standalone/scripts/samhain.ebuild-light in package samhain-standalone-doc contains reference to TMPDIR File /usr/share/doc/samhain-standalone/scripts/samhain.ebuild in package samhain-standalone-doc contains reference to TMPDIR [buildpaths] Signed-off-by: Mingli Yu <mingli.yu@...> --- .../0001-Don-t-expose-configure-args.patch | 44 +++++++++++++++++++ recipes-ids/samhain/samhain-standalone.bb | 1 + 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+) create mode 100644 recipes-ids/samhain/files/0001-Don-t-expose-configure-args.patch diff --git a/recipes-ids/samhain/files/0001-Don-t-expose-configure-args.patch b/recipes-ids/samhain/files/0001-Don-t-expose-configure-args.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000..fedbe5b --- /dev/null +++ b/recipes-ids/samhain/files/0001-Don-t-expose-configure-args.patch @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +From 111b1e8f35e989513d8961a45a806767109f6e1e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Mingli Yu <mingli.yu@...> +Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:15:30 +0800 +Subject: [PATCH] Don't expose configure args + +Don't expost configure args to fix buildpath issue. + +Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [oe specific] + +Signed-off-by: Mingli Yu <mingli.yu@...> +--- + scripts/samhain.ebuild-light.in | 2 +- + scripts/samhain.ebuild.in | 2 +- + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/scripts/samhain.ebuild-light.in b/scripts/samhain.ebuild-light.in +index 2b09cdb..b7f7062 100644 +--- a/scripts/samhain.ebuild-light.in ++++ b/scripts/samhain.ebuild-light.in +@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ src_compile() { + # --with-state-dir=/var/lib/${PN} \ + # --with-log-file=/var/log/${PN}.log \ + +- ./configure ${myconf} @mydefargs@ || die ++ ./configure ${myconf} mydefargs || die + emake || die + + echo '#!/bin/sh' > ./sstrip +diff --git a/scripts/samhain.ebuild.in b/scripts/samhain.ebuild.in +index 635a746..b9a42e7 100644 +--- a/scripts/samhain.ebuild.in ++++ b/scripts/samhain.ebuild.in +@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ src_compile() { + # --with-state-dir=/var/lib/${PN} \ + # --with-log-file=/var/log/${PN}.log \ + +- ./configure ${myconf} @mydefargs@ || die ++ ./configure ${myconf} mydefargs || die + emake || die + + echo '#!/bin/sh' > ./sstrip +-- +2.25.1 + diff --git a/recipes-ids/samhain/samhain-standalone.bb b/recipes-ids/samhain/samhain-standalone.bb index 445cb99..b832dc8 100644 --- a/recipes-ids/samhain/samhain-standalone.bb +++ b/recipes-ids/samhain/samhain-standalone.bb @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ require samhain.inc SRC_URI += "file://samhain-not-run-ptest-on-host.patch \ + file://0001-Don-t-expose-configure-args.patch \ file://run-ptest \ " -- 2.25.1 |
|
Re: [qa-build-notification] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-4.0.3.rc1)
Teoh, Jay Shen
Hello all,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Intel and WR YP QA is planning for QA execution for YP build yocto-4.0.3.rc1. We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle: OEQA-manual tests for following module: 1. OE-Core 2. BSP-hw Runtime auto test for following platforms: 1. MinnowTurbot 32-bit 2. NUC 7 3. NUC 6 4. Edgerouter 5. Beaglebone ETA for completion next Tuesday, August 16. Thanks, Jay -----Original Message----- |
|
QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-4.0.3.rc1)
Pokybuild User <pokybuild@...>
A build flagged for QA (yocto-4.0.3.rc1) was completed on the autobuilder and is available at:
https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-4.0.3.rc1 Build hash information: bitbake: b8fd6f5d9959d27176ea016c249cf6d35ac8ba03 meta-agl: 3ff972228b08c37adf41b760c2bbc5313b90715f meta-arm: cf9365fcec2e741c56ad88db7f3838f636e29cae meta-aws: 4ffc63cf28ff925bb67477cbaf7e390e968b1f8e meta-gplv2: d2f8b5cdb285b72a4ed93450f6703ca27aa42e8a meta-intel: ef3aa3064b9bbfa19f600eafb1e7d3473f62af74 meta-mingw: a90614a6498c3345704e9611f2842eb933dc51c1 meta-openembedded: 8f2dc1023482863e2630d1b94052c41ce748b38f meta-virtualization: 26a361a39ff5ab6fae22efbdc582f84d13330ba2 oecore: 2cafa6ed5f0aa9df5a120b6353755d56c7c7800d poky: 387ab5f18b17c3af3e9e30dc58584641a70f359f This is an automated message from the Yocto Project Autobuilder Git: git://git.yoctoproject.org/yocto-autobuilder2 Email: richard.purdie@... |
|
Kirkstone Upgrade now gives RDEPENDS error with /usr/bin/python
#python
#kirkstone
bgctkd@...
Good Afternoon,  |
|
Mini-Summit in Dublin: Hands on with the Yocto Project
Josef Holzmayr
Howdy there! We're happy to finally announce the Yocto Project Mini-Summit taking place the day before ELC-E in Dublin! Monday, September 12th, 2022 | 2:00 – 5:30 PM Location: Convention Centre Dublin Registration Cost: $25 Bring your boards, your questions, your problems, and your solutions to an interactive hands-on session with fellow Yocto Project experts and colleagues. We will be talking and coding hot topics like BSPs, layers, release migrations, security, and much more. Space is limited; snacks and beverages will be served. How to Register: Pre-registration is required. To register for Hands-On with Yocto Project, add it to your Open Source Summit Europe registration. See for more details and link to registration: https://events.linuxfoundation.org/open-source-summit-europe/features/co-located-events/#hands-on-with-yocto-project See you there! Josef on behalf of the YP Advocacy group |
|
Re: Recipe with kernel configuration fragment
Quentin Schulz
Hi Maik,
On 8/10/22 17:19, Maik Vermeulen wrote: Hi,This is not possible because recipe data is local to the recipe, you cannot impact a recipe from another one. The only way to have 2+ recipes doing some things in sync is by having a variable set in a global scope. Such is the case for configuration files (distro and machine). Since the selection of nftables or not is not related to HW but policy, it should be in a distro configruation file. You could add a custom DISTRO_FEATURES to your own distro and check the presence of this feature in your kernel recipe and apply the config fragment with required changes. And you can make the nftables package or whatever require this feature with REQUIRED_DISTRO_FEATURES. Cheers, Quentin |
|
Recipe with kernel configuration fragment
Maik Vermeulen
Hi,
For a firewall recipe using nftables we need to make some kernel configuration changes. At first we added the needed CONFIG_ lines to a bbappend in the recipes-kernel directory of our own layer, but I think it would be neater to include the CONFIG_ changes in the recipe that needs them, if possible. So I tried: SRC_URI = " \   file://nftables.service \   file://nftables.conf \ " RDEPENDS_${PN} += " \   nftables \ " inherit systemd SYSTEMD_AUTO_ENABLE = "enable" SYSTEMD_SERVICE_${PN} = "nftables.service" do_install_append() {  install -d ${D}/${systemd_unitdir}/system  install -m 0644 ${WORKDIR}/nftables.service ${D}/${systemd_unitdir}/system  install -d ${D}/${sysconfdir}/nftables  install -m 0644 ${WORKDIR}/nftables.conf ${D}/${sysconfdir}/nftables } FILES_${PN} += "${systemd_unitdir}/system/nftables.service" FILES_${PN} += "${sysconfdir}/nftables/nftables.conf" # Make the required changes to the kernel configuration FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-${PV}:" SRC_URI += " \  file://nftables-kernel.cfg \ " But unfortunately, the CONFIG_ changes in the nftables-kernel.cfg are not being applied.. Any hints? Thanks! Kind regards, Maik Vermeulen Embedded Software Engineer — Lightyear +31 6 16 82 73 79 ![]() Automotive Campus 70 —5708 JZ Helmond, the Netherlands This email may contain information which is privileged and/or confidential. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the email without copying or disclosing its contents to any other person. Lightyear is a trade name of Atlas Technologies B.V. and is registered at the Dutch Chamber of Commerce under number 67264298. |
|