Look into chromium recipe

Branch master has been renamed to buster. Also setting protocol to
https as GitHub is migrating away from unencrypted git protocol

Signed-off-by: Devendra Tewari <devendra.tewari@...>
---
.../linux-firmware-rpidistro/linux-firmware-rpidistro_git.bb | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux-firmware-rpidistro/linux-firmware-rpidistro_git.bb b/recipes-kernel/linux-firmware-rpidistro/linux-firmware-rpidistro_git.bb
index a091585..874e444 100644
--- a/recipes-kernel/linux-firmware-rpidistro/linux-firmware-rpidistro_git.bb
+++ b/recipes-kernel/linux-firmware-rpidistro/linux-firmware-rpidistro_git.bb
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "\
NO_GENERIC_LICENSE[Firmware-broadcom_bcm43xx-rpidistro] = "LICENCE.broadcom_bcm43xx"
NO_GENERIC_LICENSE[WHENCE] = "WHENCE"

-SRC_URI = "git://github.com/RPi-Distro/firmware-nonfree"
+SRC_URI = "git://github.com/RPi-Distro/firmware-nonfree;protocol=https;branch=buster"

SRCREV = "83938f78ca2d5a0ffe0c223bb96d72ccc7b71ca5"
PV = "20190114-1+rpt11"
--
2.33.1

N/A

Hi all,

Intel and WR YP QA is planning for QA execution for YP build yocto-3.1.12.rc1. We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle:

OEQA-manual tests for following module:
1. OE-Core
2. BSP-hw

Runtime auto test for following platforms:
1. MinnowTurbot 32-bit
2. Coffee Lake
3. NUC 7
4. NUC 6
5. Edgerouter
6. Beaglebone

ETA for completion next Tuesday, Nov 23.

Thanks,
Jay

hi sir,

i am working on yocto ,i created one core-image-base inside that image i want to set logo on u-boot and kernel side ,i added psplash also in local.conf (IMAGE_FEATURES = "psplash")  .
but default logo even not coming please tell how set splash screen logo in yocto side, bellow error i got it will be helpfull for u.

thanks in advance

Hi Khem,

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 10:50:13AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 10:03 AM Quentin Schulz <foss@...> wrote:

On November 16, 2021 6:45:05 PM GMT+01:00, Khem Raj <raj.khem@...> wrote:

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 9:12 AM Quentin Schulz <
quentin.schulz@...> wrote:

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 09:08:41AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 9:04 AM Quentin Schulz
<quentin.schulz@...> wrote:

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 09:00:42AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 7:52 AM Quentin Schulz
<quentin.schulz@...> wrote:

From Linux kernel v5.14 to v5.14.11 (both included), the Ethernet

MAC

controller found on RK3399 is not working.

A fix is available in v5.14.12 and later (available also in v5.15)
which is provided here and applied to linux-yocto source tree if
linux-yocto version is of the impacted ones.

The conditional patching is unfortunately required because

Honister 3.4

has linux-yocto v5.14.9 and Honister 3.4.1 will have at least
linux-yocto v5.14.14.

Patching piece below looks quite a bit.
lets just fix v5.14.14 and dont worry about 3.4

v5.14.14 is already fixed. The only release currently is 3.4 and I hit
that issue, hence the patch.
I assume not everybody is updating to 3.4.1 when it's out, I've seen
people running behind dot releases.
What's bothering you?

once dot release is out then thats whats maintained not the original
release since they are incremental.
the anon python to apply a patch. Can you explain why we want to patch
applied this way ?

I could define a python function and use it like this:
SRC_URI:append:rk3399 = "${@rk3399_fix_mac(d)}"

Would that work better for you?

I am not yet convinced why should we have such version specific patch

If you could explain what's *really* bothering you, I could try to find a proper explanation or agree with you but it's a bit too vague to me right now. Anyway, I'll do some guesses in the next paragraphs.

Because Ethernet does not work for all RK3399-based boards in the latest and only release of Honister?

meta-rockchip does not have honister branch for now. So it expects
master to keep working with honister for now. kernel upgrades are
already committed into honister branch on meta-yocto-bsps so fix it
already available in latest honister
branch and will be in imminent point release soon as well.

meta-rockchip does not have a honister branch for now because it is
still working with master branch from OE-Core. This patch does not break
this behaviour.

meta-rockchip is the BSP layer for Rockchip based devices, if not there, where should I put this patch?

Or are we just going to say "Ethernet does not work, we know" to people asking instead of having this patch in? Obviously you could tell them to upgrade their oe-core/poky git repo to rolling honister or 3.4.1 once it's out but having this patch in avoid those questions.

I would say yes, document it as that of a known issue and possible fix

Do I add a "known issues" to the README then? Or where am I supposed to
add this piece of information were this patch not merged?

if someone is using exact point release. They might have snapshotted
meta-rockpi too and in that case it will be easy for them to carry a
local patch if needed.
vesion specific patching would also be setting a not so desired
patching practice, so I am trying to avoid it if we can.

I think we both understand each other's stance and I've no additional
arguments to give, so it'll be up to the maintainer(s) which is
officially Trevor, but maybe I am not aware of other unofficial
maintainers :)

In any case, I can have this patch in my own vendor BSP but since it
applies to all RK3399-based devices, I thought it'd be nicer to have it
in upstream meta-rockchip than in a vendor BSP unrelated to the boards
one's using.

@Trevor/maintainers, let us know what's your opinion on this so I know
if I should send a v2 using inline python function for SRC_URI instead
of using the anonymous python function.

Cheers,
Quentin

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 09:08:41AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 9:04 AM Quentin Schulz
<quentin.schulz@...> wrote:

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 09:00:42AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 7:52 AM Quentin Schulz
<quentin.schulz@...> wrote:

From Linux kernel v5.14 to v5.14.11 (both included), the Ethernet MAC
controller found on RK3399 is not working.

A fix is available in v5.14.12 and later (available also in v5.15)
which is provided here and applied to linux-yocto source tree if
linux-yocto version is of the impacted ones.

The conditional patching is unfortunately required because Honister 3.4
has linux-yocto v5.14.9 and Honister 3.4.1 will have at least
linux-yocto v5.14.14.

Patching piece below looks quite a bit.
lets just fix v5.14.14 and dont worry about 3.4

v5.14.14 is already fixed. The only release currently is 3.4 and I hit
that issue, hence the patch.
I assume not everybody is updating to 3.4.1 when it's out, I've seen
people running behind dot releases.
What's bothering you?

once dot release is out then thats whats maintained not the original
release since they are incremental.
the anon python to apply a patch. Can you explain why we want to patch
applied this way ?

I could define a python function and use it like this:
SRC_URI:append:rk3399 = "${@rk3399_fix_mac(d)}"

Would that work better for you?

Cheers,
Quentin

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 09:00:42AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 7:52 AM Quentin Schulz
<quentin.schulz@...> wrote:

From Linux kernel v5.14 to v5.14.11 (both included), the Ethernet MAC
controller found on RK3399 is not working.

A fix is available in v5.14.12 and later (available also in v5.15)
which is provided here and applied to linux-yocto source tree if
linux-yocto version is of the impacted ones.

The conditional patching is unfortunately required because Honister 3.4
has linux-yocto v5.14.9 and Honister 3.4.1 will have at least
linux-yocto v5.14.14.

Patching piece below looks quite a bit.
lets just fix v5.14.14 and dont worry about 3.4

v5.14.14 is already fixed. The only release currently is 3.4 and I hit
that issue, hence the patch.
I assume not everybody is updating to 3.4.1 when it's out, I've seen
people running behind dot releases.
What's bothering you?

Cheers,
Quentin

A build flagged for QA (yocto-3.1.12.rc1) was completed on the autobuilder and
is available at:


https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-3.1.12.rc1


Build hash information:

bitbake: c0348de8121c3a842bf44906f7e2f79e93f7275b
meta-agl: 0406cbb235fb08ce9e6f9d07e64e0932b20050a9
meta-arm: ce535dfb96de4d2529f091d7d85a7172c626001c
meta-aws: 2f72301f5a73279c4d2f12fc6218876629666e06
meta-gplv2: 60b251c25ba87e946a0ca4cdc8d17b1cb09292ac
meta-intel: 625da85e7b01b71cc310267b0ba7119eb139e9f7
meta-mingw: 524de686205b5d6736661d4532f5f98fee8589b7
meta-openembedded: 7889158dcd187546fc5e99fd81d0779cad3e8d17
oecore: 44b1970c40e9d73f6e63fb10cdc55837a26f5921
poky: 0839888394a6e42e96f9f0d201376eb38bc79b24



This is an automated message from the Yocto Project Autobuilder
Git: git://git.yoctoproject.org/yocto-autobuilder2
Email: richard.purdie@...

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 10:03 AM Quentin Schulz <foss@...> wrote:

On November 16, 2021 6:45:05 PM GMT+01:00, Khem Raj <raj.khem@...> wrote:

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 9:12 AM Quentin Schulz <
quentin.schulz@...> wrote:

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 09:08:41AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 9:04 AM Quentin Schulz
<quentin.schulz@...> wrote:

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 09:00:42AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 7:52 AM Quentin Schulz
<quentin.schulz@...> wrote:

From Linux kernel v5.14 to v5.14.11 (both included), the Ethernet

MAC

controller found on RK3399 is not working.

A fix is available in v5.14.12 and later (available also in v5.15)
which is provided here and applied to linux-yocto source tree if
linux-yocto version is of the impacted ones.

The conditional patching is unfortunately required because

Honister 3.4

has linux-yocto v5.14.9 and Honister 3.4.1 will have at least
linux-yocto v5.14.14.

Patching piece below looks quite a bit.
lets just fix v5.14.14 and dont worry about 3.4

v5.14.14 is already fixed. The only release currently is 3.4 and I hit
that issue, hence the patch.
I assume not everybody is updating to 3.4.1 when it's out, I've seen
people running behind dot releases.
What's bothering you?

once dot release is out then thats whats maintained not the original
release since they are incremental.
the anon python to apply a patch. Can you explain why we want to patch
applied this way ?

I could define a python function and use it like this:
SRC_URI:append:rk3399 = "${@rk3399_fix_mac(d)}"

Would that work better for you?

I am not yet convinced why should we have such version specific patch

If you could explain what's *really* bothering you, I could try to find a proper explanation or agree with you but it's a bit too vague to me right now. Anyway, I'll do some guesses in the next paragraphs.

Because Ethernet does not work for all RK3399-based boards in the latest and only release of Honister?

meta-rockchip does not have honister branch for now. So it expects
master to keep working with honister for now. kernel upgrades are
already committed into honister branch on meta-yocto-bsps so fix it
already available in latest honister
branch and will be in imminent point release soon as well.

meta-rockchip is the BSP layer for Rockchip based devices, if not there, where should I put this patch?

Or are we just going to say "Ethernet does not work, we know" to people asking instead of having this patch in? Obviously you could tell them to upgrade their oe-core/poky git repo to rolling honister or 3.4.1 once it's out but having this patch in avoid those questions.

I would say yes, document it as that of a known issue and possible fix
if someone is using exact point release. They might have snapshotted
meta-rockpi too and in that case it will be easy for them to carry a
local patch if needed.
vesion specific patching would also be setting a not so desired
patching practice, so I am trying to avoid it if we can.

I understand we're talking about policy here. I am not fond of this patch either but Ethernet is quite critical on boards which don't have WiFi for example. I don't have anything better to suggest to fix this in the *latest* release.

Update to latest honister branch or wait for 3.4.1, would be my suggestion.

Cheers
Quentin

Cheers,
Quentin

Hi Stephen

Thanks for the report! Sorry, I couldn't attend the meeting.

On 11/16/21 4:47 PM, Stephen Jolley wrote:

* A request was made to continue hardknott support in the community
and this was agreed until Feb/March next year but will not overlap
the LTS.

Could I update this on https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Releases?
Cheers
Michael.
--

Michael Opdenacker, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

On November 16, 2021 6:45:05 PM GMT+01:00, Khem Raj <raj.khem@...> wrote:

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 9:12 AM Quentin Schulz <
quentin.schulz@...> wrote:

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 09:08:41AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 9:04 AM Quentin Schulz
<quentin.schulz@...> wrote:

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 09:00:42AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 7:52 AM Quentin Schulz
<quentin.schulz@...> wrote:

From Linux kernel v5.14 to v5.14.11 (both included), the Ethernet

MAC

controller found on RK3399 is not working.

A fix is available in v5.14.12 and later (available also in v5.15)
which is provided here and applied to linux-yocto source tree if
linux-yocto version is of the impacted ones.

The conditional patching is unfortunately required because

Honister 3.4

has linux-yocto v5.14.9 and Honister 3.4.1 will have at least
linux-yocto v5.14.14.

Patching piece below looks quite a bit.
lets just fix v5.14.14 and dont worry about 3.4

v5.14.14 is already fixed. The only release currently is 3.4 and I hit
that issue, hence the patch.
I assume not everybody is updating to 3.4.1 when it's out, I've seen
people running behind dot releases.
What's bothering you?

once dot release is out then thats whats maintained not the original
release since they are incremental.
the anon python to apply a patch. Can you explain why we want to patch
applied this way ?

I could define a python function and use it like this:
SRC_URI:append:rk3399 = "${@rk3399_fix_mac(d)}"

Would that work better for you?

I am not yet convinced why should we have such version specific patch

If you could explain what's *really* bothering you, I could try to find a proper explanation or agree with you but it's a bit too vague to me right now. Anyway, I'll do some guesses in the next paragraphs.

Because Ethernet does not work for all RK3399-based boards in the latest and only release of Honister?

meta-rockchip is the BSP layer for Rockchip based devices, if not there, where should I put this patch?

Or are we just going to say "Ethernet does not work, we know" to people asking instead of having this patch in? Obviously you could tell them to upgrade their oe-core/poky git repo to rolling honister or 3.4.1 once it's out but having this patch in avoid those questions.

I understand we're talking about policy here. I am not fond of this patch either but Ethernet is quite critical on boards which don't have WiFi for example. I don't have anything better to suggest to fix this in the *latest* release.

Cheers
Quentin

Cheers,
Quentin

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 9:04 AM Quentin Schulz
<quentin.schulz@...> wrote:

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 09:00:42AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 7:52 AM Quentin Schulz
<quentin.schulz@...> wrote:

From Linux kernel v5.14 to v5.14.11 (both included), the Ethernet MAC
controller found on RK3399 is not working.

A fix is available in v5.14.12 and later (available also in v5.15)
which is provided here and applied to linux-yocto source tree if
linux-yocto version is of the impacted ones.

The conditional patching is unfortunately required because Honister 3.4
has linux-yocto v5.14.9 and Honister 3.4.1 will have at least
linux-yocto v5.14.14.

Patching piece below looks quite a bit.
lets just fix v5.14.14 and dont worry about 3.4

v5.14.14 is already fixed. The only release currently is 3.4 and I hit
that issue, hence the patch.
I assume not everybody is updating to 3.4.1 when it's out, I've seen
people running behind dot releases.
What's bothering you?

once dot release is out then thats whats maintained not the original
release since they are incremental.
the anon python to apply a patch. Can you explain why we want to patch
applied this way ?

Cheers,
Quentin

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 7:52 AM Quentin Schulz
<quentin.schulz@...> wrote:

From Linux kernel v5.14 to v5.14.11 (both included), the Ethernet MAC
controller found on RK3399 is not working.

A fix is available in v5.14.12 and later (available also in v5.15)
which is provided here and applied to linux-yocto source tree if
linux-yocto version is of the impacted ones.

The conditional patching is unfortunately required because Honister 3.4
has linux-yocto v5.14.9 and Honister 3.4.1 will have at least
linux-yocto v5.14.14.

Patching piece below looks quite a bit.
lets just fix v5.14.14 and dont worry about 3.4

Cc: Quentin Schulz <foss+yocto@...>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...>
---
...-rk-Fix-ethernet-on-rk3399-based-dev.patch | 63 +++++++++++++++++++
.../linux/linux-yocto/5.14-rk3399-mac-fix.scc | 1 +
.../linux/linux-yocto_5.14.bbappend | 11 ++++
3 files changed, 75 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto/0001-net-stmmac-dwmac-rk-Fix-ethernet-on-rk3399-based-dev.patch
create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto/5.14-rk3399-mac-fix.scc
create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_5.14.bbappend

diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto/0001-net-stmmac-dwmac-rk-Fix-ethernet-on-rk3399-based-dev.patch b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto/0001-net-stmmac-dwmac-rk-Fix-ethernet-on-rk3399-based-dev.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b2ce7e8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto/0001-net-stmmac-dwmac-rk-Fix-ethernet-on-rk3399-based-dev.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+From 8efe947ea1eace444d78398a31469b30e47ae585 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@...>
+Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 22:50:49 +0900
+Subject: [PATCH] net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: Fix ethernet on rk3399 based devices
+
+[ Upstream commit aec3f415f7244b7747a7952596971adb0df2f568 ]
+
+Commit 2d26f6e39afb ("net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: fix unbalanced pm_runtime_enable warnings")
+while getting rid of a runtime PM warning ended up breaking ethernet
+on rk3399 based devices. By dropping an extra reference to the device,
+the commit ends up enabling suspend / resume of the ethernet device -
+which appears to be broken.
+
+While the issue with runtime pm is being investigated, partially
+revert commit 2d26f6e39afb to restore the network on rk3399.
+
+Fixes: 2d26f6e39afb ("net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: fix unbalanced pm_runtime_enable warnings")
+Suggested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...>
+Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@...>
+Cc: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...>
+Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...>
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210929135049.3426058-1-punitagrawal@gmail.com
+Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...>
+Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...>
+
+Upstream-Status: Backport [8efe947ea1eace444d78398a31469b30e47ae585]
+---
+ drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c | 5 +++++
+ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
+
+diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
+index ed817011a94a..6924a6aacbd5 100644
+--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
++++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
+@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
+ #include <linux/delay.h>
+ #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
+ #include <linux/regmap.h>
++#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
+
+ #include "stmmac_platform.h"
+
+@@ -1528,6 +1529,8 @@ static int rk_gmac_powerup(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
++ pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
++
+ if (bsp_priv->integrated_phy)
+ rk_gmac_integrated_phy_powerup(bsp_priv);
+
+@@ -1539,6 +1542,8 @@ static void rk_gmac_powerdown(struct rk_priv_data *gmac)
+ if (gmac->integrated_phy)
+ rk_gmac_integrated_phy_powerdown(gmac);
+
++ pm_runtime_put_sync(&gmac->pdev->dev);
++
+ phy_power_on(gmac, false);
+ gmac_clk_enable(gmac, false);
+ }
+--
+2.33.1
+
diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto/5.14-rk3399-mac-fix.scc b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto/5.14-rk3399-mac-fix.scc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1ad2bde
--- /dev/null
+++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto/5.14-rk3399-mac-fix.scc
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+patch 0001-net-stmmac-dwmac-rk-Fix-ethernet-on-rk3399-based-dev.patch
diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_5.14.bbappend b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_5.14.bbappend
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5eaa604
--- /dev/null
+++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_5.14.bbappend
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+FILESEXTRAPATHS:prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}:"
+
+# Fix Ethernet on 5.14 until 5.14.11 (included) for RK3399 MAC controller
+# Conditional patching required because Honister 3.4 has linux-yocto
+# v5.14.9 and Honister 3.4.1 will have at least linux-yocto v5.14.14.
+python __anonymous() {
+ kver = d.getVar('LINUX_VERSION') or ''
+ if bb.utils.is_semver(kver) \
+ and bb.utils.vercmp_string(kver, '5.14.11') <= 0:
+ d.appendVar('SRC_URI', ' file://5.14-rk3399-mac-fix.scc')
+}
--
2.30.2