Re: Yocto Linux Project Sync notes
Darren Hart <darren.hart@...>
On 10/19/2010 09:04 AM, Zanussi, Tom wrote:
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 08:40 -0700, Stewart, David C wrote:Everything on One machine doesn't make a lot of sense to me, for two reasons:I can try getting everything running on one machine too - would it make 1) This is heavily network dependent, making sure the machines can find eachother is a critical aspect of testing this. 2) Qemu does some magic with tun/tap devices, you have to configure things to get multicast working between guests. I've tested the mediatomb image in qemu, it works. We need to test on real hardware. 3) We don't an image that will install everything on the same machine, and making one doesn't make a lot of sense to me. 4) Running a NAS to serve up media to itself doesn't test the networking side of things as well. I'd rather use 3 real devices (even if they are all emenlow or blacksand) rather than qemu or all on one. -- Darren
-- Darren Hart Embedded Linux Kernel |
|
Re: Yocto Linux Project Sync notes
Anderson, Paul <paul.anderson@...>
I thought the plan was to do BOTH a QEMU demo and a demo on real
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
hardware? If that's not the plan, it should be the plan. Regards, -pja -----Original Message-----
From: Darren Hart [mailto:darren.hart@...] Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 2:45 PM To: Zanussi, Tom Cc: Stewart, David C; McCombe, Kevin; Wold, Saul; Zhang, Jessica; deVries, Alex; Polk, Jeffrey; Hatle, Mark; Purdie, Richard; Li, Susie; Lock, Joshua; Ashfield, Bruce; Ta, Lieu; Anderson, Paul; 'yocto@...' Subject: Re: Yocto Linux Project Sync notes On 10/19/2010 09:04 AM, Zanussi, Tom wrote: On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 08:40 -0700, Stewart, David C wrote:description of what needs to come together and wiki-fy it. RP suggests that maybe getting all the pieces running on one hardware might be a good way to try it out just in case. I can try getting everything running on one machine too - would itEverything on One machine doesn't make a lot of sense to me, for two reasons: 1) This is heavily network dependent, making sure the machines can find eachother is a critical aspect of testing this. 2) Qemu does some magic with tun/tap devices, you have to configure things to get multicast working between guests. I've tested the mediatomb image in qemu, it works. We need to test on real hardware. 3) We don't an image that will install everything on the same machine, and making one doesn't make a lot of sense to me. 4) Running a NAS to serve up media to itself doesn't test the networking side of things as well. I'd rather use 3 real devices (even if they are all emenlow or blacksand) rather than qemu or all on one. -- Darren
-- Darren Hart Embedded Linux Kernel |
|
Re: Yocto Linux Project Sync notes
Darren Hart <darren.hart@...>
On 10/19/2010 02:12 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 10/19/10 4:01 PM, Alex deVries wrote:http isn't needed. (the DLNA server will mount the files over NFS into its filesystem and Mediatomb runs it's own http server on a special port to server up the files to the media renderers).Darren (or someone else can correct me.. but what I'm doing now) - tftp (likely needed if the other boards need to network boot)No need. - Will act as THE authoritation DHCP server for the network of boardsNo DNS needed, runs over multicast, and we can specify the NFS server with a dotted quad. Perfect. Looks good Mark. -- Darren Hart Embedded Linux Kernel |
|
Re: Yocto Linux Project Sync notes
Darren Hart <darren.hart@...>
On 10/19/2010 02:48 PM, Anderson, Paul wrote:
I thought the plan was to do BOTH a QEMU demo and a demo on realThere has been no discussion of a QEMU demo for the media network demo. I've tested some components with QEMU, but we aren't currently planning on demo'ing this in QEMU. -- Darren Hart Embedded Linux Kernel |
|
Re: Yocto Linux Project Sync notes
Darren Hart <dvhart@...>
On 10/19/2010 02:12 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 10/19/10 4:01 PM, Alex deVries wrote:http isn't needed. (the DLNA server will mount the files over NFS into its filesystem and Mediatomb runs it's own http server on a special port to server up the files to the media renderers).Darren (or someone else can correct me.. but what I'm doing now) - tftp (likely needed if the other boards need to network boot)No need. - Will act as THE authoritation DHCP server for the network of boardsNo DNS needed, runs over multicast, and we can specify the NFS server with a dotted quad. Perfect. Looks good Mark. -- Darren Hart Embedded Linux Kernel |
|
Re: Yocto Linux Project Sync notes
Darren Hart <dvhart@...>
On 10/19/2010 02:48 PM, Anderson, Paul wrote:
I thought the plan was to do BOTH a QEMU demo and a demo on realThere has been no discussion of a QEMU demo for the media network demo. I've tested some components with QEMU, but we aren't currently planning on demo'ing this in QEMU. -- Darren Hart Embedded Linux Kernel |
|
Re: Yocto Linux Project Sync notes
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...>
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 14:44 -0700, Hart, Darren wrote:
On 10/19/2010 09:04 AM, Zanussi, Tom wrote:Yeah, it doesn't make sense as a demo per se, but for the folks who onlyOn Tue, 2010-10-19 at 08:40 -0700, Stewart, David C wrote:Everything on One machine doesn't make a lot of sense to me, for twoI can try getting everything running on one machine too - would it make have one system, to get it all going. Another motivition I thought was to have 'something' as a worst-case fallback, e.g. with all the 'moving pieces' Dave is worried about. Actually, it could make a little bit of sense to have a single nas-mediatomb-xxxclient image, pointing to each other on localhost, that could be easily tweaked in the field and swapped in/out as any one of the components - just a thought and probably not worth it at this point. Tom -- |
|
Re: Yocto Linux Project Sync notes
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...>
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 14:51 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
On 10/19/2010 02:48 PM, Anderson, Paul wrote:I think Paul is talking about a different demo, one where we're justI thought the plan was to do BOTH a QEMU demo and a demo on realThere has been no discussion of a QEMU demo for the media network demo. able to boot all four qemu architectures alongside each other. This should be possible with our release images, we just need someone to own it and to bring a machine with it working on it (and have a backup of the setup in case of filesystem corruption etc.). Any volunteers? Cheers, Richard |
|
Re: Yocto Linux Project Sync notes
Anderson, Paul <paul.anderson@...>
Got it. At a top level the requirement is showing stuff running on real
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
hardware (all archs) as well as within QEMU (all archs). As far as what is shown on what, that's another matter. Regards, -pja -----Original Message-----
From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@...] Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 2:52 PM To: Anderson, Paul Cc: Zanussi, Tom; Stewart, David C; McCombe, Kevin; Wold, Saul; Zhang, Jessica; deVries, Alex; Polk, Jeffrey; Hatle, Mark; Purdie, Richard; Li, Susie; Lock, Joshua; Ashfield, Bruce; Ta, Lieu; yocto@... Subject: Re: Yocto Linux Project Sync notes On 10/19/2010 02:48 PM, Anderson, Paul wrote: I thought the plan was to do BOTH a QEMU demo and a demo on realThere has been no discussion of a QEMU demo for the media network demo. I've tested some components with QEMU, but we aren't currently planning on demo'ing this in QEMU. -- Darren Hart Embedded Linux Kernel |
|
Re: Yocto Linux Project Sync notes
Anderson, Paul <paul.anderson@...>
Spot on, Richard.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-pja -----Original Message-----
From: Richard Purdie [mailto:rpurdie@...] Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 3:09 PM To: Darren Hart Cc: Anderson, Paul; Zanussi, Tom; Stewart, David C; McCombe, Kevin; Wold, Saul; Zhang, Jessica; deVries, Alex; Polk, Jeffrey; Hatle, Mark; Li, Susie; Lock, Joshua; Ashfield, Bruce; Ta, Lieu; yocto@... Subject: Re: Yocto Linux Project Sync notes On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 14:51 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: On 10/19/2010 02:48 PM, Anderson, Paul wrote:demo.I thought the plan was to do BOTH a QEMU demo and a demo on realThere has been no discussion of a QEMU demo for the media network I've tested some components with QEMU, but we aren't currentlyI think Paul is talking about a different demo, one where we're just able to boot all four qemu architectures alongside each other. This should be possible with our release images, we just need someone to own it and to bring a machine with it working on it (and have a backup of the setup in case of filesystem corruption etc.). Any volunteers? Cheers, Richard |
|
Yocto Readiness Review Meeting
Saul Wold <saul.wold@...>
David, Kevin, Paul, Richard:
As discussed in the project sync we need to do a readiness review to look at the current state of the release with regards to existing open bugs, QA testing, and general sanity of the release. The best time for this would be Thursday morning at 11:00, could the folks on the "To:" line please respond with your availablity to meet at this time. We need to do it in the morning to enable Richard to attend at a "reasonable" hour. Thursday Oct 21, 2010 11:00AM Where: 916-356-2663, 8-356-2663 Bridge 92 / 3302969 Thanks Sau! |
|
Re: Yocto Readiness Review Meeting
Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@...>
On 10/19/10 5:13 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
11am Pacific should work.. I have a short meeting somewhere between 2 and 6 EDT... (or 10 and 2 Pacific).. Hopefully this won't interfere.. (sorry I don't have details beyond that wide range.. but it's supposed to be 15 minutes or less) :P --Mark Thanks |
|
Re: Yocto Readiness Review Meeting
Anderson, Paul <paul.anderson@...>
Kevin is on vacation, so he's out for sure. He doesn't get back until
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
after CELF anyway. I'm OOO Thursday, but can make an exception for this, preusming we can motor through it reasonably quickly. It would be good to see the data as to where we are. Regards, -pja -----Original Message-----
From: Saul Wold [mailto:saul.wold@...] Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 3:13 PM To: Stewart, David C; McCombe, Kevin; Purdie, Richard; Anderson, Paul Cc: Zhang, Jessica; deVries, Alex; Polk, Jeffrey; Hatle, Mark; Li, Susie; Lock, Joshua; Ashfield, Bruce; Zanussi, Tom; Hart, Darren; Ta, Lieu; 'yocto@...' Subject: Yocto Readiness Review Meeting David, Kevin, Paul, Richard: As discussed in the project sync we need to do a readiness review to look at the current state of the release with regards to existing open bugs, QA testing, and general sanity of the release. The best time for this would be Thursday morning at 11:00, could the folks on the "To:" line please respond with your availablity to meet at this time. We need to do it in the morning to enable Richard to attend at a "reasonable" hour. Thursday Oct 21, 2010 11:00AM Where: 916-356-2663, 8-356-2663 Bridge 92 / 3302969 Thanks Sau! |
|
Re: Yocto Readiness Review Meeting
Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@...>
On 10/19/10 5:17 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 10/19/10 5:13 PM, Saul Wold wrote:Finally got the time locked down.11am Pacific should work.. I have a short meeting somewhere between 2 and 6 My meeting does NOT conflict with this time, so 11am (Pacific) is good for me. --Mark --MarkThanks |
|
Re: Yocto Readiness Review Meeting
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...>
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 15:13 -0700, Wold, Saul wrote:
David, Kevin, Paul, Richard:This is ok with me. Cheers, Richard |
|
Re: Call for help for demo UPNP media renderer
Joshua Lock <josh@...>
It seems I didn't push all of my changes, just trying to replicate them
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
here and push. Joshua On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 14:31 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
--
Joshua Lock Intel Open Source Technology Centre |
|
Re: Call for help for demo UPNP media renderer
Tian, Kevin <kevin.tian@...>
so Josh, have you pushed all of your changes now? That way Dongxiao can follow
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
up with it here. Thanks Kevin From: Joshua Lock |
|
Re: Call for help for demo UPNP media renderer
Joshua Lock <josh@...>
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 14:31 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
I did a sloppy job pushing my changes when leaving the office but think I have replicated most/all of the in the josh/demo branch. I also took a look through the rygel code to see what gstreamer elements are explicitly being used, I've created a list and tried to ensure as many as possible of them are in the IMAGE_INSTALL list for poky-image-rygel, adding them to the RDEPENDS for rygel doesn't appear to have included them in the image I just created... Full list of names of pipeline elements I found in the rygel code follows: decodebin2, videorate, videoscale, ffmpegcolorspace, ffenc_wmv1, twolame, lame, mp3parse, ffenc_wmav2, convert-sink-pad, ffenc_mpeg2video, audio-src-pad, audio-sink-pad, audio-enc-sink-pad, sink, mpegtsmux, audioconvert, audioresample, audiorate, capsfilter, audiotestsrc, videotestsrc, ffmux_asf Cheers, Joshua -- Joshua Lock Intel Open Source Technology Centre |
|
Re: Call for help for demo UPNP media renderer
Tian, Kevin <kevin.tian@...>
From: Joshua LockHave all of above elements already enabled in your branch, or is it still in progress to follow up? Is it a separate issue from segfault or related in your gut-feeling? Thanks Kevin
|
|
Re: Call for help for demo UPNP media renderer
Joshua Lock <josh@...>
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 01:04 +0100, Joshua Lock wrote:
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 14:31 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:The image I just built with my latest changes in josh/demo worked!?!I did a sloppy job pushing my changes when leaving the office but think Rygel did not segfault :-) If you have time Dongxiao (or anyone else) I'd appreciate if you could double-check my changes (my install_append in rygel to create a .config isn't working, so you'll need to do that manually and run rygel-preferences to disable the tracker plugin). If you could test using Rygel as a renderer for some content served by the mediatomb image, that would be much appreciated. You'll want gupnp-av-cp as provided by gupnp-tools to control the renderer and content server. Thanks, Joshua -- Joshua Lock Intel Open Source Technology Centre |
|