|
Re: Error while testing "core-image-minimal" through "bitbake core-image-minimal -c testimage -v"
#linux
#warning
#toolchain
#bitbake
#dunfell
Hello Alexander
Please find the output of 'env' below
Hello Alexander
Please find the output of 'env' below
|
By
Nikita Gupta
·
#57593
·
|
|
Providing Read/Write permission to "etc" in Read only Rootfile system
#zeus
#yocto
Greetings !
I am working on NXP's i.MX6UL SoC and I have successfully built a Read-only Rootfile system through Yocto.
Now I am having a requirement of making only "/etc" as Read & Writable .
So , Can
Greetings !
I am working on NXP's i.MX6UL SoC and I have successfully built a Read-only Rootfile system through Yocto.
Now I am having a requirement of making only "/etc" as Read & Writable .
So , Can
|
By
Poornesh G ( India - Bangalore )
·
#57592
·
|
|
Re: [Openembedded-architecture] Let's drop x86-x32 (was Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 05/51] rpm: update 4.17.0 -> 4.17.1)
The fixing is often wrapped in target-specific conditionals, and so
fixing one does not address the other, until the conditional is
expanded with additional or statements, or checks are done from
The fixing is often wrapped in target-specific conditionals, and so
fixing one does not address the other, until the conditional is
expanded with additional or statements, or checks are done from
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#57591
·
|
|
Re: [Openembedded-architecture] Let's drop x86-x32 (was Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 05/51] rpm: update 4.17.0 -> 4.17.1)
Ok, let's ask Intel, specifically Anuj :-)
Anuj, does Intel still care about x32, and would anyone notice if
yocto drops x32 support from master branch?
Alex
Ok, let's ask Intel, specifically Anuj :-)
Anuj, does Intel still care about x32, and would anyone notice if
yocto drops x32 support from master branch?
Alex
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#57590
·
|
|
Re: [Openembedded-architecture] Let's drop x86-x32 (was Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 05/51] rpm: update 4.17.0 -> 4.17.1)
Does the RISC-V ecosystem care about riscv32?
The problem with Intel x32 is that very few people care, so we end up fixing upstream software. If RISC-V cares then we won’t be alone.
Also, Intel
Does the RISC-V ecosystem care about riscv32?
The problem with Intel x32 is that very few people care, so we end up fixing upstream software. If RISC-V cares then we won’t be alone.
Also, Intel
|
By
Ross Burton
·
#57589
·
|
|
[PATCH v2] auto-generate releases.rst
From: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@...>
From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...>
In order to maintain one less file, let's auto-generate the releases.rst
file
From: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@...>
From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...>
In order to maintain one less file, let's auto-generate the releases.rst
file
|
By
Michael Opdenacker
·
#57588
·
|
|
Re: [Openembedded-architecture] Let's drop x86-x32 (was Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 05/51] rpm: update 4.17.0 -> 4.17.1)
<richard.purdie@...> wrote:
But then why not replace x32 with riscv32, which as well has 32 bit
pointers but 64 bit integers and thus trips over the same type size
issues?
Alex
<richard.purdie@...> wrote:
But then why not replace x32 with riscv32, which as well has 32 bit
pointers but 64 bit integers and thus trips over the same type size
issues?
Alex
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#57587
·
|
|
Re: [Openembedded-architecture] Let's drop x86-x32 (was Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 05/51] rpm: update 4.17.0 -> 4.17.1)
That amounts to dropping x32 support because as soon as we remove these
tests, it will bitrot.
There is still some value in the project being able to support
different architectures and different
That amounts to dropping x32 support because as soon as we remove these
tests, it will bitrot.
There is still some value in the project being able to support
different architectures and different
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#57586
·
|
|
Let's drop x86-x32 (was Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 05/51] rpm: update 4.17.0 -> 4.17.1)
Note: this update fails on x32 with
| configure: error: unrecognized GNU build triplet linux-gnux32
This time I want to put my foot down and suggest that we just drop the
whole x32 variant from the
Note: this update fails on x32 with
| configure: error: unrecognized GNU build triplet linux-gnux32
This time I want to put my foot down and suggest that we just drop the
whole x32 variant from the
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#57585
·
|
|
Re: Error while testing "core-image-minimal" through "bitbake core-image-minimal -c testimage -v"
#linux
#warning
#toolchain
#bitbake
#dunfell
This is not what I asked for (which was output of 'env'). Also, this
shows the output of bitbake -c testimage, not of runqemu with
nographic parameter.
Alex
This is not what I asked for (which was output of 'env'). Also, this
shows the output of bitbake -c testimage, not of runqemu with
nographic parameter.
Alex
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#57584
·
|
|
Re: Error while testing "core-image-minimal" through "bitbake core-image-minimal -c testimage -v"
#linux
#warning
#toolchain
#bitbake
#dunfell
Hello Alexander,
Please find the output file in attachment .
Thanks
Hello Alexander,
Please find the output file in attachment .
Thanks
|
By
Nikita Gupta
·
#57583
·
|
|
Re: Error while testing "core-image-minimal" through "bitbake core-image-minimal -c testimage -v"
#linux
#warning
#toolchain
#bitbake
#dunfell
Hello Khem Raj ,
After rebooting i am getting same error .
Hello Khem Raj ,
After rebooting i am getting same error .
|
By
Nikita Gupta
·
#57582
·
|
|
How to enable UTF-8 locale for tmux while using external toolchain
#dunfell
#linux
I am using the AM572x evaluation module with the TI SDK, which uses the linaro toolchain. I am trying to enable UTF-8 so that I can use tmux.
I am enabling it using the follow method:
unset
I am using the AM572x evaluation module with the TI SDK, which uses the linaro toolchain. I am trying to enable UTF-8 so that I can use tmux.
I am enabling it using the follow method:
unset
|
By
Jason C
·
#57581
·
|
|
Re: Error while testing "core-image-minimal" through "bitbake core-image-minimal -c testimage -v"
#linux
#warning
#toolchain
#bitbake
#dunfell
maybe you should reboot the host machine, sometimes system updates
without rebooting the machine can also result in such errors.
maybe you should reboot the host machine, sometimes system updates
without rebooting the machine can also result in such errors.
|
By
Khem Raj
·
#57580
·
|
|
Re: [qa-build-notification] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-4.1_M2.rc1)
Hello everyone,
Intel and WR YP QA is planning for QA execution for YP build yocto-4.1_M2.rc1. We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle:
OEQA-manual tests for following module:
1.
Hello everyone,
Intel and WR YP QA is planning for QA execution for YP build yocto-4.1_M2.rc1. We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle:
OEQA-manual tests for following module:
1.
|
By
Teoh, Jay Shen
·
#57579
·
|
|
QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-4.1_M2.rc1)
A build flagged for QA (yocto-4.1_M2.rc1) was completed on the autobuilder and is available at:
https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-4.1_M2.rc1
Build hash information:
bitbake:
A build flagged for QA (yocto-4.1_M2.rc1) was completed on the autobuilder and is available at:
https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-4.1_M2.rc1
Build hash information:
bitbake:
|
By
Pokybuild User <pokybuild@...>
·
#57578
·
|
|
Re: Error while testing "core-image-minimal" through "bitbake core-image-minimal -c testimage -v"
#linux
#warning
#toolchain
#bitbake
#dunfell
Can I see the output of 'env' please?
Alex
Can I see the output of 'env' please?
Alex
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#57577
·
|
|
Hash Equivalence Server Domain Change
We are moving the hash equivalence server to dedicated servers. As part of the change we need to change the domain.
Please update any BB_HASHSERVE_UPSTREAM variables from "typhoon.yocto.io:8687" to
We are moving the hash equivalence server to dedicated servers. As part of the change we need to change the domain.
Please update any BB_HASHSERVE_UPSTREAM variables from "typhoon.yocto.io:8687" to
|
By
Michael Halstead
·
#57576
·
|
|
Re: Error while testing "core-image-minimal" through "bitbake core-image-minimal -c testimage -v"
#linux
#warning
#toolchain
#bitbake
#dunfell
Hello Alexander
Yes I have tried that already but i am getting same error.
If anyone could it would be great.
Thanks in advance
Hello Alexander
Yes I have tried that already but i am getting same error.
If anyone could it would be great.
Thanks in advance
|
By
Nikita Gupta
·
#57575
·
|
|
Re: Error while testing "core-image-minimal" through "bitbake core-image-minimal -c testimage -v"
#linux
#warning
#toolchain
#bitbake
#dunfell
You can try adding nographic option to runqemu if you do not need to
see graphical output from your image.
Alex
You can try adding nographic option to runqemu if you do not need to
see graphical output from your image.
Alex
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#57574
·
|