|
Re: Yocto Zeus -docker/PREEMPT_RT
Hello Steven,
No, that remark is completely wrong and is mixing up things.
"RTLinux" has nothing to do with the mainstream Linux kernel (except
that RTLinux can run the Linux kernel
Hello Steven,
No, that remark is completely wrong and is mixing up things.
"RTLinux" has nothing to do with the mainstream Linux kernel (except
that RTLinux can run the Linux kernel
|
By
Leon Woestenberg
·
#56208
·
|
|
Yocto Zeus -docker/PREEMPT_RT
I have 2 platforms one with a standard kernel the other using PREEMPT_RT kernel… both work as expected.
All things being equal, when I add docker container support to both platforms, the
I have 2 platforms one with a standard kernel the other using PREEMPT_RT kernel… both work as expected.
All things being equal, when I add docker container support to both platforms, the
|
By
Monsees, Steven C (US)
·
#56207
·
|
|
same build for multiple machine configurations
Hello all,
I'm not sure if this is even possible at all. I'm using the meta-raspberry layer to build raspberry images. Whilst I'm able to build images by strictly selecting a raspberry pi machine
Hello all,
I'm not sure if this is even possible at all. I'm using the meta-raspberry layer to build raspberry images. Whilst I'm able to build images by strictly selecting a raspberry pi machine
|
By
Alexandru Ionita
·
#56206
·
|
|
Re: [OE-core] [qa-build-notification] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-3.1.14.rc1)
Thanks for testing! The TSC did discuss this today and agreed it should be good
to release.
Cheers,
Richard
Thanks for testing! The TSC did discuss this today and agreed it should be good
to release.
Cheers,
Richard
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#56205
·
|
|
Yocto Project Status WW07`22
Current Dev Position: YP 3.5 M3
Next Deadline: 21th Feb. 2022 YP 3.5 M3 build
Next Team Meetings:
Bug Triage meeting Thursday Feb. 17th 7:30 am PDT
Current Dev Position: YP 3.5 M3
Next Deadline: 21th Feb. 2022 YP 3.5 M3 build
Next Team Meetings:
Bug Triage meeting Thursday Feb. 17th 7:30 am PDT
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#56204
·
|
|
gpsd bbappend adding new file causing QA errors even with FILES_${PN}:append set
Hi,
I've seen many questions about this with proposed answers but I cannot
seem to get this to work for my bbappend to gpsd.
I'm simply trying to add an additional systemd service file I created
for
Hi,
I've seen many questions about this with proposed answers but I cannot
seem to get this to work for my bbappend to gpsd.
I'm simply trying to add an additional systemd service file I created
for
|
By
mattwood2000@...
·
#56203
·
|
|
Best laptop for compiling Yocto
Hello All,
I have a System 76 Serval laptop that I have been using when building Yocto. It seems to be dying and they are on back order now, so not available for replacement. I was wondering what
Hello All,
I have a System 76 Serval laptop that I have been using when building Yocto. It seems to be dying and they are on back order now, so not available for replacement. I was wondering what
|
By
Greg Wilson-Lindberg
·
#56202
·
|
|
Re: [linux-yocto] Controlling features enable/disable across recipe and meta layers ?
You need to define several distributions (e.g. several
conf/distro/something.conf files), then you can set DISTRO_FEATURES
accordingly in each of them, and then on the recipe level
PACKAGECONFIGs can
You need to define several distributions (e.g. several
conf/distro/something.conf files), then you can set DISTRO_FEATURES
accordingly in each of them, and then on the recipe level
PACKAGECONFIGs can
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#56201
·
|
|
Re: Controlling features enable/disable across recipe and meta layers ?
Hi,
I have many questions about Yocto features.
My main question is: In Yocto what is the best mechanism to define a
feature flag such that it can be accessed across many layers and
recipes ?
We are
Hi,
I have many questions about Yocto features.
My main question is: In Yocto what is the best mechanism to define a
feature flag such that it can be accessed across many layers and
recipes ?
We are
|
By
Pintu Agarwal
·
#56200
·
|
|
Re: [qa-build-notification] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-3.1.14.rc1)
Hi All,
This is the full report for yocto-3.1.14.rc1:
https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-testresults-contrib/tree/?h=intel-yocto-testresults
======= Summary ========
No high
Hi All,
This is the full report for yocto-3.1.14.rc1:
https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-testresults-contrib/tree/?h=intel-yocto-testresults
======= Summary ========
No high
|
By
Teoh, Jay Shen
·
#56199
·
|
|
Re: [qa-build-notification] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-3.4.2.rc2)
Hi all,
Intel and WR YP QA is planning for QA execution for YP build yocto-3.4.2.rc2. We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle:
OEQA-manual tests for following module:
1. OE-Core
2.
Hi all,
Intel and WR YP QA is planning for QA execution for YP build yocto-3.4.2.rc2. We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle:
OEQA-manual tests for following module:
1. OE-Core
2.
|
By
Teoh, Jay Shen
·
#56198
·
|
|
M+ & H bugs with Milestone Movements WW07
All,
YP M+ or high bugs which moved to a new milestone in WW07 are listed below:
Priority
Bug ID
Short Description
Changer
Owner
Was
Became
Medium+
10693
Add a testcase for multilib eSDK on
All,
YP M+ or high bugs which moved to a new milestone in WW07 are listed below:
Priority
Bug ID
Short Description
Changer
Owner
Was
Became
Medium+
10693
Add a testcase for multilib eSDK on
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#56197
·
|
|
Enhancements/Bugs closed WW07!
All,
The below were the owners of enhancements or bugs closed during the last week!
Who
Count
randy.macleod@...
8
richard.purdie@...
3
pavel@...
1
Grand Total
12
Thanks,
Stephen K.
All,
The below were the owners of enhancements or bugs closed during the last week!
Who
Count
randy.macleod@...
8
richard.purdie@...
3
pavel@...
1
Grand Total
12
Thanks,
Stephen K.
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#56196
·
|
|
Current high bug count owners for Yocto Project 3.5
All,
Below is the list as of top 46 bug owners as of the end of WW07 of who have open medium or higher bugs and enhancements against YP 3.5. There are 52 possible work days left until the final
All,
Below is the list as of top 46 bug owners as of the end of WW07 of who have open medium or higher bugs and enhancements against YP 3.5. There are 52 possible work days left until the final
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#56195
·
|
|
Yocto Project Newcomer & Unassigned Bugs - Help Needed
All,
The triage team is starting to try and collect up and classify bugs which a newcomer to the project would be able to work on in a way which means people can find them. They're being listed on
All,
The triage team is starting to try and collect up and classify bugs which a newcomer to the project would be able to work on in a way which means people can find them. They're being listed on
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#56194
·
|
|
Re: [meta-hardening][PATCH] meta-hardening: Fix override syntax
Thanks for the ping. I didn't find this in my inbox but found it on lore mailing list.
Patch looks fine.
thanks,
-armin
Thanks for the ping. I didn't find this in my inbox but found it on lore mailing list.
Patch looks fine.
thanks,
-armin
|
By
Armin Kuster
·
#56193
·
|
|
QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-3.4.2.rc2)
A build flagged for QA (yocto-3.4.2.rc2) was completed on the autobuilder and is available at:
https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-3.4.2.rc2
Build hash information:
bitbake:
A build flagged for QA (yocto-3.4.2.rc2) was completed on the autobuilder and is available at:
https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-3.4.2.rc2
Build hash information:
bitbake:
|
By
Pokybuild User <pokybuild@...>
·
#56192
·
|
|
Re: Additional hardening options
Hi,
I've been looking into those flags (and a few more) a while back when picking compiler flags to use for Oniro.
-Wl,-z,-noexecstack is unproblematic, -fstack-clash-protection adds a bit of
Hi,
I've been looking into those flags (and a few more) a while back when picking compiler flags to use for Oniro.
-Wl,-z,-noexecstack is unproblematic, -fstack-clash-protection adds a bit of
|
By
Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@...>
·
#56191
·
|
|
Re: Building Yocto on M1 Mac
Giving docker all 16 GB of memory made the build take 124 minutes. I assume this is due to the VM docker uses fighting for memory with the build and the host, slowing things down. I’m sure someone
Giving docker all 16 GB of memory made the build take 124 minutes. I assume this is due to the VM docker uses fighting for memory with the build and the host, slowing things down. I’m sure someone
|
By
Robert Joslyn
·
#56190
·
|
|
[meta-security-compliance][PATCH] scap-security-guide: Fix openembedded platform tests
Update the installed_OS_is_openembedded check to drop the quotes
in the VERSION_ID string to match f451c68667cca of openembedded-core.
Without this fix, all tests are reported as
Update the installed_OS_is_openembedded check to drop the quotes
in the VERSION_ID string to match f451c68667cca of openembedded-core.
Without this fix, all tests are reported as
|
By
Akshay Bhat
·
#56189
·
|