|
Re: sstate mirror file name length issue
#dunfell
There were changes in
By
Richard Purdie
·
#58569
·
|
|
sstate mirror file name length issue
#dunfell
Hello,
I try to use yocto SSTATE_MIRROR with a custom distribution (RDK: https://developer.rdkcentral.com/) and enabled yocto multilib support.
The sstate directory is created by my build server and
Hello,
I try to use yocto SSTATE_MIRROR with a custom distribution (RDK: https://developer.rdkcentral.com/) and enabled yocto multilib support.
The sstate directory is created by my build server and
|
By
Markus Held
·
#58568
·
|
|
Re: build 2 sdk toolchain
This is the correct way, yes. You can put SDKMACHINE into local.conf
(default is 'linux sdk'), or you can specify it on command line (in
which case it will override the local.conf setting).
Alex
On
This is the correct way, yes. You can put SDKMACHINE into local.conf
(default is 'linux sdk'), or you can specify it on command line (in
which case it will override the local.conf setting).
Alex
On
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#58567
·
|
|
build 2 sdk toolchain
Hello,
we use kirkstone.
We will build
Image
Toolchain for linux
Toolchain for windows
Now we can build a image + linux sdk toolchain.
That work correct.
$ bitbake my-image
$ bitbake
Hello,
we use kirkstone.
We will build
Image
Toolchain for linux
Toolchain for windows
Now we can build a image + linux sdk toolchain.
That work correct.
$ bitbake my-image
$ bitbake
|
By
Johann Obermayr
·
#58566
·
|
|
Error while bitbake
#dunfell
I am trying to build rcar-image-minimal for RCar S4, while bitbake I'm getting do_rootfs: The postinstall intercept hook 'update_pixbuf_cache' failed error. I tried using cleanall and cleansstate but
I am trying to build rcar-image-minimal for RCar S4, while bitbake I'm getting do_rootfs: The postinstall intercept hook 'update_pixbuf_cache' failed error. I tried using cleanall and cleansstate but
|
By
Shruti gandotra
·
#58565
·
|
|
Re: Error while running bitbake
So, I was able to build successfully using Ubuntu 22.04 docker container. It looks something in my host OS environment didn't quite agree with Yocto.
On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 12:34 PM Sriram
So, I was able to build successfully using Ubuntu 22.04 docker container. It looks something in my host OS environment didn't quite agree with Yocto.
On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 12:34 PM Sriram
|
By
Sriram Chadalavada
·
#58564
·
|
|
QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-4.1.1.rc1)
A build flagged for QA (yocto-4.1.1.rc1) was completed on the autobuilder and is available at:
https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-4.1.1.rc1
Build hash information:
bitbake:
A build flagged for QA (yocto-4.1.1.rc1) was completed on the autobuilder and is available at:
https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-4.1.1.rc1
Build hash information:
bitbake:
|
By
Pokybuild User <pokybuild@...>
·
#58563
·
|
|
M+ & H bugs with Milestone Movements WW46
All,
YP M+ or high bugs which moved to a new milestone in WW46 are listed below:
Priority
Bug ID
Short Description
Changer
Owner
Was
Became
Medium+
13190
RRS cannot handle multiple recipes
All,
YP M+ or high bugs which moved to a new milestone in WW46 are listed below:
Priority
Bug ID
Short Description
Changer
Owner
Was
Became
Medium+
13190
RRS cannot handle multiple recipes
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#58562
·
|
|
Enhancements/Bugs closed WW46!
All,
The below were the owners of enhancements or bugs closed during the last week!
Who
Count
randy.macleod@...
2
ross.burton@...
2
mark.asselstine@...
1
Grand Total
5
Thanks,
Stephen
All,
The below were the owners of enhancements or bugs closed during the last week!
Who
Count
randy.macleod@...
2
ross.burton@...
2
mark.asselstine@...
1
Grand Total
5
Thanks,
Stephen
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#58561
·
|
|
Current high bug count owners for Yocto Project 4.2
All,
Below is the list as of top 31 bug owners as of the end of WW46 of who have open medium or higher bugs and enhancements against YP 4.2. There are 113 possible work days left until the final
All,
Below is the list as of top 31 bug owners as of the end of WW46 of who have open medium or higher bugs and enhancements against YP 4.2. There are 113 possible work days left until the final
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#58560
·
|
|
Yocto Project Newcomer & Unassigned Bugs - Help Needed
All,
The triage team is starting to try and collect up and classify bugs which a newcomer to the project would be able to work on in a way which means people can find them. They're being listed on
All,
The triage team is starting to try and collect up and classify bugs which a newcomer to the project would be able to work on in a way which means people can find them. They're being listed on
|
By
Stephen Jolley
·
#58559
·
|
|
Re: [linux-yocto] Removing DISTRO_FEATURES from a specific machine type
Hi Pintu,
Pintu Agarwal <pintu.ping@...> escreveu no dia segunda, 14/11/2022 à(s) 16:35:
For such cases Yocto have the COMBINED_FEATURES that can be more
Hi Pintu,
Pintu Agarwal <pintu.ping@...> escreveu no dia segunda, 14/11/2022 à(s) 16:35:
For such cases Yocto have the COMBINED_FEATURES that can be more
|
By
Jose Quaresma
·
#58558
·
|
|
Re: [linux-yocto] Removing DISTRO_FEATURES from a specific machine type
Have you looked at COMBINED_FEATURES?
This allows you to only enable something if it is in both
DISTRO_FEATURES and MACHINE_FEATURES.
Cheers,
Richard
Have you looked at COMBINED_FEATURES?
This allows you to only enable something if it is in both
DISTRO_FEATURES and MACHINE_FEATURES.
Cheers,
Richard
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#58557
·
|
|
Re: Removing DISTRO_FEATURES from a specific machine type
Hi,
This question is related to Yocto Dunfell specifically.
I have certain distro features defined (by default) in our distro
include/conf file.
These distro features are required for certain
Hi,
This question is related to Yocto Dunfell specifically.
I have certain distro features defined (by default) in our distro
include/conf file.
These distro features are required for certain
|
By
Pintu Agarwal
·
#58556
·
|
|
Removing DISTRO_FEATURES from a specific machine type
Hi,
This question is related to Yocto Dunfell specifically.
I have certain distro features defined (by default) in our distro include/conf file.
These distro features are required for certain machines
Hi,
This question is related to Yocto Dunfell specifically.
I have certain distro features defined (by default) in our distro include/conf file.
These distro features are required for certain machines
|
By
Pintu Agarwal
·
#58555
·
|
|
#kirkstone boot script section not added in the fitimage
#kirkstone
Hello,
I am working on kirkstone. If UBOOT_ENV is specified and kernel-fitimage is in KERNEL_CLASSES, boot script section is not added in the fitimage.
In fitimage_assemble
Hello,
I am working on kirkstone. If UBOOT_ENV is specified and kernel-fitimage is in KERNEL_CLASSES, boot script section is not added in the fitimage.
In fitimage_assemble
|
By
Sébastien Fabre
·
#58554
·
|
|
Re: source-less python
Hello Alex,
Just to go with some concrete numbers from a Buildroot example I have under my hands, with just very basic Python 3.10 support (so no additional modules, just what gets in with only
Hello Alex,
Just to go with some concrete numbers from a Buildroot example I have under my hands, with just very basic Python 3.10 support (so no additional modules, just what gets in with only
|
By
Federico Pellegrin
·
#58553
·
|
|
[meta-zephyr][PATCH] CI/qemu-cortex-m0: remove zephyr-philosophers test
zephyr-philosophers no longer fits within the defined SRAM space, and
fails to compile based on a check for this during building. Currently,
qemu-cortex-m0.yml inherits the targets from base.yml.
zephyr-philosophers no longer fits within the defined SRAM space, and
fails to compile based on a check for this during building. Currently,
qemu-cortex-m0.yml inherits the targets from base.yml.
|
By
Jon Mason
·
#58552
·
|
|
Re: Error while running bitbake
Hi Marco,
Here is the top of the log:
Could not find platform independent libraries <prefix>
Could not find platform dependent libraries <exec_prefix>
Consider setting $PYTHONHOME to
Hi Marco,
Here is the top of the log:
Could not find platform independent libraries <prefix>
Could not find platform dependent libraries <exec_prefix>
Consider setting $PYTHONHOME to
|
By
Sriram Chadalavada
·
#58551
·
|
|
Re: source-less python
Generally we slim down python installations by not installing all of
the standard library, and rather having precise dependencies for
specific modules. Can you illustrate the kind of space savings
Generally we slim down python installations by not installing all of
the standard library, and rather having precise dependencies for
specific modules. Can you illustrate the kind of space savings
|
By
Alexander Kanavin
·
#58550
·
|